Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

High Court Recognizes Woman's Right to Reproductive Choices in Termination of Pregnancy Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur has reaffirmed a woman's right to make reproductive choices as a dimension of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The court's decision came in response to WPC No. 2665 of 2023, a case involving a minor girl who was a victim of rape and sought the termination of her pregnancy.

The petitioner, represented by Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal and Mr. Vivek Shrivastava, advocates, approached the court after a medical practitioner initially refused to terminate her pregnancy due to the ongoing criminal case against the accused. The petitioner relied on previous judgments, WPC No. 2869/2019 and WPC No. 3674/2019, which upheld the importance of a woman's consent and recognized the right to reproductive choices.

Justice P. Sam Koshy, presiding over the case, referred to the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 and emphasized that if the pregnancy does not exceed 20 weeks and poses a risk to the life or physical and mental health of the pregnant woman, it can be terminated by a registered medical practitioner without attracting penal provisions. The court took into consideration the petitioner's overall well-being, potential harm and distress, and the social stigma attached to being an unmarried mother.

Based on these factors, the High Court granted the petitioner's plea and allowed her to undergo the termination of her pregnancy. The court further ordered the preservation of the DNA sample for the pending criminal case against the accused, ensuring the availability of additional evidence.

This judgment sets an important precedent, highlighting the protection of women's reproductive autonomy and privacy as fundamental rights. It aligns with the recent trend of Indian courts recognizing women's rights to make decisions about their own bodies, including the choice to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. By safeguarding these rights, the court acknowledges the physical and mental trauma a victim of rape may endure throughout the pregnancy and the potential lifelong impact on both the mother and the child.

The decision emphasizes the need to respect a woman's right to privacy, dignity, and bodily integrity, ensuring that her reproductive choices are not unduly restricted. It also addresses the societal implications and the potential harm and distress that can arise if a pregnancy resulting from rape is allowed to continue. The court's ruling reflects a compassionate and forward-thinking approach in protecting the well-being of the petitioner and recognizing the importance of reproductive rights.

This judgment will serve as an important reference point for future cases involving the termination of pregnancies resulting from sexual offenses. It reinforces the principle that compelling a woman to continue with an unwanted pregnancy would infringe upon her fundamental rights, paving the way for greater empowerment and autonomy for women across the country.

Date of Decision: 19/06/2023

xxx vs State Of Chhattisgarh 

Latest Legal News