Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     When Two Accused Face Identical Charges, One Cannot Be Convicted While the Other is Acquitted: Supreme Court Emphasizes Principle of Parity in Acquittal    |     Supreme Court Limits Interim Protection for Financial Institutions, Modifies Order on FIRs Filed by Borrowers    |     Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail in Methamphetamine Case After Delay in Chemical Analysis Report    |     No Sign of Recent Intercourse; No Injury Was Found On Her Body Or Private Parts: Gauhati High Court Acquits Two In Gang Rape Case    |     Failure to Disclose Relationship with Key Stakeholder Led to Setting Aside of Arbitral Award: Gujarat High Court    |     Strict Compliance with UAPA's 7-Day Timeline for Sanctions is Essential:  Supreme Court    |     PAT Teachers Entitled to Regularization from 2014, Quashes Prospective Regularization as Arbitrary: Himachal Pradesh High Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Anonymity Protections for Victims in Sensitive Cases: Right to Privacy Prevails Over Right to Information    |     Certified Copy of Will Admissible Under Registration Act, 1908: Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea for Production of Original Will    |     Injuries on Non-Vital Parts Do Not Warrant Conviction for Attempt to Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Modifies Conviction Under Section 307 IPC to Section 326 IPC    |     Classification Based on Wikipedia Data Inadmissible; Tribunal to Reassess Using Actual Financial Records: PH High Court Orders Reconsideration of Wage Dispute    |     Mere Delay in Initiation Does Not Justify Reduction of Damages: Jharkhand High Court on Provident Fund Defaults    |     Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     An Award that Shocks the Conscience of the Court Cannot Stand, Especially When Public Money is Involved: Calcutta HC Reduces Quantum by Half    |     Trademark Transaction Within Territoriality Principle Subject to Indian Tax Laws: Bombay High Court Dismisses Hindustan Unilever's Petition on Non-Deduction of TDS    |     Concealment of Material Facts Bars Relief under Article 226: SC Reprimands Petitioners for Lack of Bonafides    |     Without Determination of the Will's Genuineness, Partition is Impossible: Supreme Court on Liberal Approach to Pleading Amendments    |     Candidates Cannot Challenge a Selection Process After Participating Without Protest : Delhi High Court Upholds ISRO's Administrative Officer Recruitment    |     Invalid Bank Guarantee Invocation Found Fatal to Recovery Claim: Delhi High Court Dismisses GAIL’s Appeal    |     Adverse Remarks in APAR Recorded Without Objectivity and Likely Motivated by Bias: Delhi High Court Quashes Biased APAR Downgrade of CRPF Officer    |    

High Court Quashes FIR Against Ram Rahim - No Malice or Intent to Insult Religious Beliefs in Spiritual Discourse

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has quashed an FIR filed against the spiritual leader Saint Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh Insan, underlining a crucial observation that there was “no malice or intent to insult religious beliefs” in his discourse involving revered figures Sant Kabir Das and Guru Ravidas.

The decision, pronounced on October 30, 2023, by Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul, came as a relief to the petitioner, who had faced accusations of outraging religious feelings under Section 295A of the IPC. The Court meticulously examined the entirety of the discourse delivered by the petitioner and various historical texts, concluding that the narrative did not insult the religious sentiments or beliefs of any specific group.

Justice Kaul emphasized the importance of context in such matters, stating, “The entire discourse, including its theme and context would have to be thus considered and not just selective excerpts.” This statement was crucial in understanding the Court’s approach to discerning the intent behind the petitioner’s words.

The FIR, lodged seven years after the discourse in question, was highlighted as a point of contention. The Court noted the absence of any complaints in the preceding years, suggesting a lack of impact on religious sentiments at the time of the discourse.

Furthermore, the Court’s decision also underscored the significance of preventing abuse of the legal process. “When people file false and frivolous complaints, it seriously amounts to abuse of the process of law,” Justice Kaul remarked, reinforcing the need for judicial scrutiny in such cases.

This ruling not only resonates as a triumph for the petitioner but also sets a precedent in the delicate balance between freedom of speech and religious sentiments. It reiterates the judicial system’s role in safeguarding individuals against unwarranted accusations while respecting religious sensibilities.

Date of Decision: 30.10.2023

Saint Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh Insan  VS State of Punjab and another

Similar News