Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

High Court Quashes FIR Against Ram Rahim - No Malice or Intent to Insult Religious Beliefs in Spiritual Discourse

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has quashed an FIR filed against the spiritual leader Saint Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh Insan, underlining a crucial observation that there was “no malice or intent to insult religious beliefs” in his discourse involving revered figures Sant Kabir Das and Guru Ravidas.

The decision, pronounced on October 30, 2023, by Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul, came as a relief to the petitioner, who had faced accusations of outraging religious feelings under Section 295A of the IPC. The Court meticulously examined the entirety of the discourse delivered by the petitioner and various historical texts, concluding that the narrative did not insult the religious sentiments or beliefs of any specific group.

Justice Kaul emphasized the importance of context in such matters, stating, “The entire discourse, including its theme and context would have to be thus considered and not just selective excerpts.” This statement was crucial in understanding the Court’s approach to discerning the intent behind the petitioner’s words.

The FIR, lodged seven years after the discourse in question, was highlighted as a point of contention. The Court noted the absence of any complaints in the preceding years, suggesting a lack of impact on religious sentiments at the time of the discourse.

Furthermore, the Court’s decision also underscored the significance of preventing abuse of the legal process. “When people file false and frivolous complaints, it seriously amounts to abuse of the process of law,” Justice Kaul remarked, reinforcing the need for judicial scrutiny in such cases.

This ruling not only resonates as a triumph for the petitioner but also sets a precedent in the delicate balance between freedom of speech and religious sentiments. It reiterates the judicial system’s role in safeguarding individuals against unwarranted accusations while respecting religious sensibilities.

Date of Decision: 30.10.2023

Saint Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh Insan  VS State of Punjab and another

Latest Legal News