Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

High Court Quashes Arrest and Remand in PMLA Case - Non-Compliance with Section 19 – Orders Immediate Release

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark ruling on October 31, 2023, the Punjab and Haryana High Court nullified the arrest and subsequent remand of Roop Bansal, stating a clear violation of procedural norms under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. The decision emphasized the necessity of adhering to the statutory mandate of providing written grounds for arrest, as per Section 19 of the PMLA.

The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justice Arun Palli and Justice Vikram Aggarwal, underscored the deficiency in the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) procedure, which led to the petitioner's illegal detention. "The arrest of the petitioner was also illegal and cannot be sustained," the bench declared, after finding that the ED failed to supply the written grounds of arrest to Bansal, an act that was deemed non-negotiable by the Court.

This case, which echoes the precedents set by the Supreme Court in similar matters, has brought into focus the critical nature of procedural compliance in arrests related to money laundering charges. The bench referred to the Supreme Court's observation, “any non-compliance with the mandate of Section 19 of the Act of 2002, would enure to the benefit of the person arrested.”

The Court’s decision was also influenced by the argument presented by Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, the Senior Advocate representing the petitioner, who cited the recent Supreme Court judgment in Pankaj Bansal's case, which necessitated the furnishing of arrest grounds in writing.

The petitioner, who has been in custody following allegations of money laundering linked to transactions prior to the establishment of a predicate offense under PMLA, was ordered to be released forthwith unless required in connection with any other case.

The High Court’s stand is a significant reinforcement of the legal protection accorded to individuals against arbitrary arrest and detention, safeguarding personal liberty as enshrined in the Constitution of India.

Date of Decision: 31.10.2023

Roop Bansal VS Union of India and another       

Latest Legal News