Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Collector’s Appointment of Ex-Serviceman as Lambardar: Preference for Service to the State Valid Tax to Be Computed at 100% Under DTVSV Act, Rejects Inclusion of Belated Grounds in Disputed Tax: Bombay High Court Petitioner’s Father Did Not Fall Within Definition of Enemy – Kerala High Court Quashes Land Classification Under Enemy Property Act Calcutta High Court Upholds Cancellation of LPG Distributor LOI for Violating Guidelines Recording 'Reasons to Believe' is a Mandatory Safeguard, Not a Mere Formality Under PMLA: P&H High Court Illegality Is Incurable, Unauthorized Constructions Cannot Be Regularized: Bombay High Court Kerala High Court Quashes Tribunal’s Order Granting Retrospective UGC Benefits to Librarians Without Required Qualifications Order XLI Rule 27 CPC | No Evidence Can Be Admitted Beyond Pleadings, And Additional Evidence Cannot Be Allowed Merely To Fill Lacunae: Jharkhand High Court Quashing | Mere Heated Exchanges Over Loan Repayment Do Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide: Supreme Court Prisoner Transfers Must Prioritize Security and Prevent Gang Violence: Supreme Court Restores Intra-State Transfer Order Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC Is Conditional Upon Framing Substantial Questions of Law: Supreme Court Panchayat Election | Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Bar on Judicial Review During Election Process Encroachment Allegation Requires Concrete Evidence, Not Mere Surmises: Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea for Disqualification of Sarpanch Order Denying Permission for Peaceful Protest Rally Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Prolonged Custody Alone Cannot Justify Bail In Cases Involving Heinous Crimes: Delhi High Court Body Shaming and Sexually Colored Remarks Are Unacceptable In A Civilized Society: Kerala High Court No Mandatory Injunction Where Failure to Prove Ownership and Possession: Punjab and Haryana High Court Supreme Court Dismisses Article 32 Petition Seeking Declaration of Bombay High Court Judgment as Illegal Specific Relief Act | Power to Extend Time Under Section 28 Is Discretionary and Must Be Exercised Prudently: Supreme Court

High Court Orders Transfer of Matrimonial Case Based on Wife's Convenience

06 September 2024 5:20 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam has ordered the transfer of a matrimonial case to prioritize the convenience of the wife. The judgment, delivered by the Honorable Mr. Justice Anil K. Narendran and the Honorable Mr. Justice P.G. Ajithkumar on Wednesday, 21st June 2023, highlights the importance of considering the convenience of the wife in matrimonial disputes.

The court, in its judgment, stated, "When a transfer is sought by the wife in consideration of her convenience, that request shall ordinarily be allowed by the court." The ruling emphasizes the significance of the wife's convenience and her right to choose the court for legal proceedings.

The case involved Rajam Babu, aged 69, who filed a transfer petition seeking the transfer of O.P.No.2752 of 2019 from the Family Court in Ernakulam to the Family Court in Thrissur. The petitioner, in her plea, cited her convenience and the need for a joint trial of the divorce petition and the petition for restitution of conjugal rights. However, the transfer petition was initially dismissed by the lower court.

Upon reviewing the case, the High Court referred to previous Supreme Court judgments that emphasized the wife's convenience in such matters. The court noted that a joint trial of both petitions is essential to avoid conflicting decisions. Considering the age and comparative hardship of both parties, the court concluded that transferring the case was necessary.

Citing Section 21A of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the court held that a transfer of the case was warranted as per the provision's requirements. The judgment further underscored that the dignity of a woman is upheld when her choice and convenience are respected, particularly in family matters.

Date of Decision: 21st day of June 2023

RAJAM BABU vs BABU K.K

Similar News