Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

High Court Orders Expedited Acquisition and Compensation for Unlawfully Dispossessed Landowner in Delhi

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a landmark judgment, has directed the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to expedite the acquisition process and compensate a landowner who was unlawfully dispossessed of his property. The case, involving a dispute over land in Village Bharthal, saw the petitioner seeking redress for land used by DDA for constructing a road and footpath without proper acquisition.

Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, in her judgment, emphasized the need for swift legal redressal in cases of unlawful dispossession. “Depriving the appellants of their immovable properties was a clear violation of Article 21 of the Constitution,” the Judge noted, underscoring the gravity of the situation.

The petitioner, the recorded owner of the land, had sought the court’s intervention after DDA constructed a boundary wall and road on the land without due process. While DDA admitted to the mistake and expressed willingness to compensate as per the new Act of 2013, the petitioner demanded an alternate piece of land in lieu of the one used.

The Court, after careful consideration, denied the request for alternate land allotment, citing the lack of a statutory right for such a claim under the prevailing laws. The judgment stressed that the lawful course of action was compensation, not land allotment. “The appellants have been seriously discriminated against... This kind of discrimination not only breeds corruption, but also disrespect for governance,” Justice Arora observed, highlighting the broader implications of such cases.

The Court’s directive for expedited acquisition under the new Act of 2013 and immediate compensation represents a significant step in addressing grievances related to unlawful land dispossession. It also reinforces the legal obligation of state authorities to adhere to due process and provide just compensation.

Date of Decision: 08.12.2023.

VINOD RAJORIA VS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS.

 

Latest Legal News