Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

HIGH COURT ON FRAUDULENT PRACTICES BY NURSING COLLEGE, ORDERS COMPENSATION RUPEES TEN LAKHS FOR  EACH STUDENT

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, uncovered shocking fraudulent practices carried out by Mother Marry College of Nursing. The court ordered the college to compensate the students for the loss of one year and directed the respondent university to take legal and administrative action against the institution. The decision was rendered on 21st June 2023 by the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suraj Govindaraj.

The petition, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, sought relief for technical glitches in uploading student details for the B.Sc. Nursing course. The petitioners, represented by Sri Pradeep Kumar P.K. and Sri S.S. Mamadapur, urged the court to direct the respondent university to consider their representation and enable the web portal for uploading student details and issuing registration numbers without discrimination.

Upon examining the case, the court discovered alarming irregularities in the admission process. The Admission Register provided as evidence revealed fabricated entries, including the addition of students’ names after the deadline for uploading details. The court expressed grave concern over the college’s fraudulent actions, which were evident from the way students’ names were manipulated in the records.

Justice Suraj Govindaraj expressed his disappointment at the college’s actions, stating, “The petitioner No.1 College is playing with the lives of the students and their parents who had their hopes and aspirations... The serious omissions and commissions on the part of the petitioner No.1 College cannot be overlooked.”

Considering the impact on the students, the court ordered Mother Marry College of Nursing to compensate each of the petitioner students, Bhosale Tejas Ashok, Makasare Vishwajit Sanjay, Gawari Sahil Ashok, Alhat Shubham Bhagwan, Shaikh Numan Rafik, Bidkar Sachin Sunil, Tribhuvan Akash Prakash, Borde Kunal Changdev, Parsaiyya Ajay Somnath, and Alhat Suresh Devdan, with a sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees ten lakhs only) each. The compensation was intended to alleviate the loss suffered by the students due to the college’s fraudulent activities.

Furthermore, the court directed the respondent university to take appropriate action against Mother Marry College of Nursing, including filing a criminal complaint and initiating administrative measures. The original Admission Register and Attendance Register, which served as crucial evidence, were returned to the respondent university for further action.

The court’s ruling emphasized the need for a thorough investigation by the appropriate authorities, and the possibility of criminal action against the college was not ruled out. The judgment serves as a stern reminder that fraudulent practices in educational institutions will not be tolerated.

This judgment sets a precedent for upholding the integrity of the admission process and ensuring the well-being of students. It serves as a wake-up call to educational institutions to uphold ethical standards and prioritize the interests of the students they serve.

Date of Decision: 21st June, 2023  

MOTHER MARRY COLLEGE OF NURSING vs THE REGISTRAR RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF  HEALTH SCIENCES KARNATAKA

Latest Legal News