Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

HIGH COURT ON FRAUDULENT PRACTICES BY NURSING COLLEGE, ORDERS COMPENSATION RUPEES TEN LAKHS FOR  EACH STUDENT

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, uncovered shocking fraudulent practices carried out by Mother Marry College of Nursing. The court ordered the college to compensate the students for the loss of one year and directed the respondent university to take legal and administrative action against the institution. The decision was rendered on 21st June 2023 by the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suraj Govindaraj.

The petition, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, sought relief for technical glitches in uploading student details for the B.Sc. Nursing course. The petitioners, represented by Sri Pradeep Kumar P.K. and Sri S.S. Mamadapur, urged the court to direct the respondent university to consider their representation and enable the web portal for uploading student details and issuing registration numbers without discrimination.

Upon examining the case, the court discovered alarming irregularities in the admission process. The Admission Register provided as evidence revealed fabricated entries, including the addition of students’ names after the deadline for uploading details. The court expressed grave concern over the college’s fraudulent actions, which were evident from the way students’ names were manipulated in the records.

Justice Suraj Govindaraj expressed his disappointment at the college’s actions, stating, “The petitioner No.1 College is playing with the lives of the students and their parents who had their hopes and aspirations... The serious omissions and commissions on the part of the petitioner No.1 College cannot be overlooked.”

Considering the impact on the students, the court ordered Mother Marry College of Nursing to compensate each of the petitioner students, Bhosale Tejas Ashok, Makasare Vishwajit Sanjay, Gawari Sahil Ashok, Alhat Shubham Bhagwan, Shaikh Numan Rafik, Bidkar Sachin Sunil, Tribhuvan Akash Prakash, Borde Kunal Changdev, Parsaiyya Ajay Somnath, and Alhat Suresh Devdan, with a sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees ten lakhs only) each. The compensation was intended to alleviate the loss suffered by the students due to the college’s fraudulent activities.

Furthermore, the court directed the respondent university to take appropriate action against Mother Marry College of Nursing, including filing a criminal complaint and initiating administrative measures. The original Admission Register and Attendance Register, which served as crucial evidence, were returned to the respondent university for further action.

The court’s ruling emphasized the need for a thorough investigation by the appropriate authorities, and the possibility of criminal action against the college was not ruled out. The judgment serves as a stern reminder that fraudulent practices in educational institutions will not be tolerated.

This judgment sets a precedent for upholding the integrity of the admission process and ensuring the well-being of students. It serves as a wake-up call to educational institutions to uphold ethical standards and prioritize the interests of the students they serve.

Date of Decision: 21st June, 2023  

MOTHER MARRY COLLEGE OF NURSING vs THE REGISTRAR RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF  HEALTH SCIENCES KARNATAKA

Latest Legal News