Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

High Court of Kerala Suspends Sentence for One, Denies for Another found to be involved in 30 Crimes

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Kerala, presided over by the Honourable Justice P.G. Ajithkumar, has rendered a divided verdict in the case of two individuals convicted of serious offences, including attempted murder under Section 307 of the IPC. The court has granted suspension of sentence to the first petitioner, Ratheesh, while denying the same to the second petitioner, Eldho @ Achi Eldho, citing their extensive criminal backgrounds and involvement in multiple crimes.

Justice Ajithkumar, in his judgment, highlighted the complexity of the case. "The question is whether there is any special circumstance to deny them bail," the judge observed, referring to the extensive criminal history of both petitioners. The first petitioner, Ratheesh, was found to be involved in 30 crimes, yet had not been convicted in any of these. Conversely, Eldho, the second petitioner, had a conviction under Section 307 of IPC and was involved in a case under Section 302 of IPC.

The decision comes in the wake of a detailed examination of the petitioners' involvement in numerous crimes, with the court meticulously listing their criminal history. The ruling underscored the principle that suspension of sentence should be considered liberally unless exceptional circumstances exist, as per the Apex Court's guidelines in Bhagwan Rama Shinde Gosai and others v. State of Gujarat.

Justice Ajithkumar's judgment also referenced Omprakash Sahni v. Jai Shankar Chaudhary [AIR 2023 SC 2202], emphasizing the appellate court's duty to objectively assess materials on record when deciding on suspension of execution of sentence.

The court granted suspension of sentence to Ratheesh under strict conditions, including a bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two solvent sureties and adherence to specific conduct requirements. Meanwhile, the petition for suspension of sentence for Eldho was dismissed due to his more severe criminal record and past convictions.

Date - 8th day of December 2023

RATHEESH  VS THE STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News