Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

High Court of Kerala Suspends Sentence for One, Denies for Another found to be involved in 30 Crimes

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Kerala, presided over by the Honourable Justice P.G. Ajithkumar, has rendered a divided verdict in the case of two individuals convicted of serious offences, including attempted murder under Section 307 of the IPC. The court has granted suspension of sentence to the first petitioner, Ratheesh, while denying the same to the second petitioner, Eldho @ Achi Eldho, citing their extensive criminal backgrounds and involvement in multiple crimes.

Justice Ajithkumar, in his judgment, highlighted the complexity of the case. "The question is whether there is any special circumstance to deny them bail," the judge observed, referring to the extensive criminal history of both petitioners. The first petitioner, Ratheesh, was found to be involved in 30 crimes, yet had not been convicted in any of these. Conversely, Eldho, the second petitioner, had a conviction under Section 307 of IPC and was involved in a case under Section 302 of IPC.

The decision comes in the wake of a detailed examination of the petitioners' involvement in numerous crimes, with the court meticulously listing their criminal history. The ruling underscored the principle that suspension of sentence should be considered liberally unless exceptional circumstances exist, as per the Apex Court's guidelines in Bhagwan Rama Shinde Gosai and others v. State of Gujarat.

Justice Ajithkumar's judgment also referenced Omprakash Sahni v. Jai Shankar Chaudhary [AIR 2023 SC 2202], emphasizing the appellate court's duty to objectively assess materials on record when deciding on suspension of execution of sentence.

The court granted suspension of sentence to Ratheesh under strict conditions, including a bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two solvent sureties and adherence to specific conduct requirements. Meanwhile, the petition for suspension of sentence for Eldho was dismissed due to his more severe criminal record and past convictions.

Date - 8th day of December 2023

RATHEESH  VS THE STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News