Mere Entry, Abuse Or Assault Is Not Civil Contempt – Willfulness And Dispossession Must Be Clearly Proved: Bombay High Court Magistrate Cannot Shut Eyes To Final Report After Cognizance – Supplementary Report Must Be Judicially Considered Before Framing Charges: Allahabad High Court Examination-in-Chief Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction Amid Serious Doubts: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Cannot Reclaim Absolute Ownership After Letting Your Declaration Suit Fail: AP High Court Enforces Finality in Partition Appeal Death Due to Fat Embolism and Delayed Treatment Is Not Culpable Homicide: Orissa High Court Converts 30-Year-Old 304 Part-I Conviction to Grievous Hurt Fabricated Lease Cannot Be Sanctified by Consolidation Entry: Orissa High Court Dismisses 36-Year-Old Second Appeal Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization

"High Court of Kerala Denies Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Involving Ganja- Cites Rigour of Section 37"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Kerala has denied bail to Nandakumar N, the second accused in a case involving the transportation of 140 KG of Ganja. The case is registered under Crime No.26/2021 of the Excise Enforcement & Anti Narcotic Special Squad, Ernakulam, and the accused is charged under Sections 20(b)(ii)C, 25, and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.

Nandakumar N has been in judicial custody since his arrest on April 28, 2021. His application for regular bail was submitted in the context of his prolonged detention. The prosecution argued that the accused was driving the vehicle in which the contraband was found, concealed among boxes of mangoes.

The Court, presided over by Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A., carefully examined the records and observed that the petitioner was driving the vehicle at the time of the arrest. The Court also noted that the contraband was found in a large quantity, making it difficult to believe that the accused was unaware of its presence.

The petitioner's counsel cited various Supreme Court decisions to argue for bail based on the length of detention. However, the Court distinguished these cases, stating that the rigour under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which imposes stringent conditions for granting bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband, cannot be ignored.

The Court found that the conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not met and therefore denied bail to the petitioner. The Court also directed the Sessions Judge to complete the trial within the period mentioned in a report dated June 15, 2023.

This ruling sends a strong message about the strict implementation of the NDPS Act, particularly Section 37, which imposes stringent conditions for bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband.

Date of Decision: 3rd August 2023

NANDAKUMAR N vs STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News