Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

"High Court of Kerala Denies Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Involving Ganja- Cites Rigour of Section 37"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Kerala has denied bail to Nandakumar N, the second accused in a case involving the transportation of 140 KG of Ganja. The case is registered under Crime No.26/2021 of the Excise Enforcement & Anti Narcotic Special Squad, Ernakulam, and the accused is charged under Sections 20(b)(ii)C, 25, and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.

Nandakumar N has been in judicial custody since his arrest on April 28, 2021. His application for regular bail was submitted in the context of his prolonged detention. The prosecution argued that the accused was driving the vehicle in which the contraband was found, concealed among boxes of mangoes.

The Court, presided over by Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A., carefully examined the records and observed that the petitioner was driving the vehicle at the time of the arrest. The Court also noted that the contraband was found in a large quantity, making it difficult to believe that the accused was unaware of its presence.

The petitioner's counsel cited various Supreme Court decisions to argue for bail based on the length of detention. However, the Court distinguished these cases, stating that the rigour under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which imposes stringent conditions for granting bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband, cannot be ignored.

The Court found that the conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not met and therefore denied bail to the petitioner. The Court also directed the Sessions Judge to complete the trial within the period mentioned in a report dated June 15, 2023.

This ruling sends a strong message about the strict implementation of the NDPS Act, particularly Section 37, which imposes stringent conditions for bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband.

Date of Decision: 3rd August 2023

NANDAKUMAR N vs STATE OF KERALA

 

Similar News