Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

"High Court of Kerala Denies Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Involving Ganja- Cites Rigour of Section 37"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Kerala has denied bail to Nandakumar N, the second accused in a case involving the transportation of 140 KG of Ganja. The case is registered under Crime No.26/2021 of the Excise Enforcement & Anti Narcotic Special Squad, Ernakulam, and the accused is charged under Sections 20(b)(ii)C, 25, and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.

Nandakumar N has been in judicial custody since his arrest on April 28, 2021. His application for regular bail was submitted in the context of his prolonged detention. The prosecution argued that the accused was driving the vehicle in which the contraband was found, concealed among boxes of mangoes.

The Court, presided over by Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A., carefully examined the records and observed that the petitioner was driving the vehicle at the time of the arrest. The Court also noted that the contraband was found in a large quantity, making it difficult to believe that the accused was unaware of its presence.

The petitioner's counsel cited various Supreme Court decisions to argue for bail based on the length of detention. However, the Court distinguished these cases, stating that the rigour under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which imposes stringent conditions for granting bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband, cannot be ignored.

The Court found that the conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not met and therefore denied bail to the petitioner. The Court also directed the Sessions Judge to complete the trial within the period mentioned in a report dated June 15, 2023.

This ruling sends a strong message about the strict implementation of the NDPS Act, particularly Section 37, which imposes stringent conditions for bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband.

Date of Decision: 3rd August 2023

NANDAKUMAR N vs STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News