Inadequate Explanation Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Foundation For Conviction If Prosecution Fails To Prove Case: Allahabad High Court No-Confidence Motion In Housing Societies Fails If 2/3 Majority Not Met; Fractions In Voting Threshold Cannot Be Rounded Down: Bombay High Court Successor Rent Controller Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Or Act As Appellate Court Under Review Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Restores Eviction Order Article 21 Overrides PMLA Section 45 Rigors In Cases Of Unduly Long Incarceration Without Trial: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail To SSC Scam ‘Middleman’ Unregistered Family Partition Deed Recording Past Oral Arrangement Doesn't Require Compulsory Registration: Gujarat High Court Private Banks Acting As Authorised Dealers Under FEMA Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction; Can Refuse Transactions For 'Sanctions-Related' Concerns: Gauhati High Court Non-Examination Of Investigating Officer Not Fatal To Prosecution Case If Eyewitness Testimony Is Credible & Trustworthy: Jharkhand High Court Mere Denial Of Signature Insufficient When Execution Is Proved Through Endorsements: Karnataka High Court Restores Specific Performance Decree Sectarianism Claims Can't Discredit Reliable Testimony Of Child Sexual Abuse Victim: Kerala High Court Upholds Madrassa Teacher's Conviction State Must Prove Specific 'Public Interest' To Exempt Projects From Social Impact Assessment Under Section 10A Land Acquisition Act: Telangana High Court Or 2 Rule 2 CPC |Failure To Seek Specific Performance In Earlier Injunction Suit Bars Subsequent Claim; Readiness & Willingness Must Be Continuous: Madras High Court Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Does Not Result In Automatic Discharge In Criminal Case: Orissa High Court History Sheet Can Be Opened On 'Reasonable Belief' Even Without Conviction, But Must Be Reviewed After 7 Years Of Good Conduct: Rajasthan High Court

"High Court of Kerala Denies Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Involving Ganja- Cites Rigour of Section 37"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Kerala has denied bail to Nandakumar N, the second accused in a case involving the transportation of 140 KG of Ganja. The case is registered under Crime No.26/2021 of the Excise Enforcement & Anti Narcotic Special Squad, Ernakulam, and the accused is charged under Sections 20(b)(ii)C, 25, and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.

Nandakumar N has been in judicial custody since his arrest on April 28, 2021. His application for regular bail was submitted in the context of his prolonged detention. The prosecution argued that the accused was driving the vehicle in which the contraband was found, concealed among boxes of mangoes.

The Court, presided over by Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A., carefully examined the records and observed that the petitioner was driving the vehicle at the time of the arrest. The Court also noted that the contraband was found in a large quantity, making it difficult to believe that the accused was unaware of its presence.

The petitioner's counsel cited various Supreme Court decisions to argue for bail based on the length of detention. However, the Court distinguished these cases, stating that the rigour under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which imposes stringent conditions for granting bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband, cannot be ignored.

The Court found that the conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not met and therefore denied bail to the petitioner. The Court also directed the Sessions Judge to complete the trial within the period mentioned in a report dated June 15, 2023.

This ruling sends a strong message about the strict implementation of the NDPS Act, particularly Section 37, which imposes stringent conditions for bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband.

Date of Decision: 3rd August 2023

NANDAKUMAR N vs STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News