Promotees Allowed to Challenge Provisional Seniority List in Dispute Between Direct Recruitment and Promotion: Kerala High Court Frivolous Defenses Cannot Justify Leave to Defend Under Order XXXVII CPC Delhi High Court Candidates Merely Enrolled in Final Year B.V.Sc. Program Ineligible for Veterinary Officer Recruitment: Rajasthan High Court Manufacturing or Sale of Garments Does Not Attract Copyright Protection; Procedural Violations Under Trade Marks Act Renders Prosecution Unsustainable: P&H High Court Ownership Alone Is Not Sufficient to Maintain Eviction Suit; Plaintiff Must Qualify as a Lessor Under Lease Agreement: Calcutta High Court Findings Based on Evidence Cannot Be Interfered With in a Second Appeal Without Substantial Question of Law: AP High Court Chain of Circumstances Broken: Inferences Cannot Replace Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Kerala High Court Bail | Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 of the Constitution: Bombay High Court Encroachment on a Common Lane Gives Rise to Recurring Cause of Action: Madras High Court Holds Limitation Act Inapplicable to Pathway Disputes Reproductive Autonomy Includes the Right to Abort Without Spousal Consent: P&H High Court Access to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 is Not an Absolute Bar Against MSEFC Awards: Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on Writ Jurisdiction to Larger Bench Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted for Title and Mortgage Disputes Under SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court Principle of Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Supreme Court Panchayat Law | Mandatory Compliance With Section 34 And Rule 3 Is Non-Negotiable In Resignation Cases: Bombay High Court Quashes Resignation Of Upa-Sarpanch Recovery of Bullet Fired from Accused’s Weapon Crucial: PH High Court Reaffirms Conviction in Murder Case Injured Witness Evidence Carries Built-in Reliability Unless Contradicted Significantly: Kerala High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Murder Case Civil Dispute with Criminal Elements Cannot Be Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Karnataka High Court Issuance of Summons Under Section 91 CrPC During Preliminary Verification is Without Jurisdiction: High Court of J&K and Ladakh Article 21 Prevails Over NDPS Act’s Section 37 Restrictions in Cases of Prolonged Incarceration: Delhi High Court Once a Property is Waqf, It Remains Waqf Perpetually: Calcutta High Court Affirms No Secular Ownership Can Derive from Waqf Properties Surveillance Without Opportunity to Object Violates Articles 14, 19, and 21: Allahabad High Court Quashes Class-B History Sheets Mandatory Provisions of Order XXI CPC Were Violated, Rendering the Auction Sale Illegal: Punjab and Haryana High Court

"High Court of Kerala Denies Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Involving Ganja- Cites Rigour of Section 37"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Kerala has denied bail to Nandakumar N, the second accused in a case involving the transportation of 140 KG of Ganja. The case is registered under Crime No.26/2021 of the Excise Enforcement & Anti Narcotic Special Squad, Ernakulam, and the accused is charged under Sections 20(b)(ii)C, 25, and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.

Nandakumar N has been in judicial custody since his arrest on April 28, 2021. His application for regular bail was submitted in the context of his prolonged detention. The prosecution argued that the accused was driving the vehicle in which the contraband was found, concealed among boxes of mangoes.

The Court, presided over by Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A., carefully examined the records and observed that the petitioner was driving the vehicle at the time of the arrest. The Court also noted that the contraband was found in a large quantity, making it difficult to believe that the accused was unaware of its presence.

The petitioner's counsel cited various Supreme Court decisions to argue for bail based on the length of detention. However, the Court distinguished these cases, stating that the rigour under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which imposes stringent conditions for granting bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband, cannot be ignored.

The Court found that the conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not met and therefore denied bail to the petitioner. The Court also directed the Sessions Judge to complete the trial within the period mentioned in a report dated June 15, 2023.

This ruling sends a strong message about the strict implementation of the NDPS Act, particularly Section 37, which imposes stringent conditions for bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband.

Date of Decision: 3rd August 2023

NANDAKUMAR N vs STATE OF KERALA

 

Similar News