Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

High Court of Delhi Grants Bail in High-Profile Amrapali Group Fraud Case - Key Director Released After Years in Custody

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the primacy of personal liberty, the Delhi High Court today granted bail to a director of the beleaguered Amrapali Group, involved in a major real estate scandal. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Bansal, emphasized the principle that “bail is the rule and jail is an exception”, highlighting the judiciary’s stance on the balance between personal liberty and the demands of justice.

The Court’s decision comes in the wake of allegations of fraud, cheating, and criminal breach of trust against the directors of the Amrapali Group, related to their residential projects. The Court observed that despite the gravity of the accusations, the lack of specific allegations against the applicant in financial matters and the documentary nature of the evidence reduced the risk of evidence tampering.

Justice Bansal, in his judgment, noted, “The right to speedy trial and justice has been recognized as a fundamental right,” citing the Supreme Court’s judgment in Sanjay Chandra v. CBI. This observation was pivotal in deciding the bail application, reflecting the court’s approach towards ensuring timely justice.

The applicant had been in judicial custody since October 2018, and the Court acknowledged his cooperative behavior during the investigation process. The decision to grant bail also took into account the substantial amount already recovered from the applicant and his family, in compliance with a Supreme Court order.

This ruling is expected to set a precedent in cases involving corporate fraud, with the judiciary reaffirming its commitment to uphold personal liberties, even as it navigates the complexities of white-collar crime. The decision has been met with mixed reactions, sparking discussions on the legal processes surrounding economic offenses in India.

 Date of Decision: 17 November, 2023

AJAY KUMAR VS STATE NCT OF DELHI                          

Latest Legal News