Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

High Court of Delhi Grants Bail in High-Profile Amrapali Group Fraud Case - Key Director Released After Years in Custody

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the primacy of personal liberty, the Delhi High Court today granted bail to a director of the beleaguered Amrapali Group, involved in a major real estate scandal. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Bansal, emphasized the principle that “bail is the rule and jail is an exception”, highlighting the judiciary’s stance on the balance between personal liberty and the demands of justice.

The Court’s decision comes in the wake of allegations of fraud, cheating, and criminal breach of trust against the directors of the Amrapali Group, related to their residential projects. The Court observed that despite the gravity of the accusations, the lack of specific allegations against the applicant in financial matters and the documentary nature of the evidence reduced the risk of evidence tampering.

Justice Bansal, in his judgment, noted, “The right to speedy trial and justice has been recognized as a fundamental right,” citing the Supreme Court’s judgment in Sanjay Chandra v. CBI. This observation was pivotal in deciding the bail application, reflecting the court’s approach towards ensuring timely justice.

The applicant had been in judicial custody since October 2018, and the Court acknowledged his cooperative behavior during the investigation process. The decision to grant bail also took into account the substantial amount already recovered from the applicant and his family, in compliance with a Supreme Court order.

This ruling is expected to set a precedent in cases involving corporate fraud, with the judiciary reaffirming its commitment to uphold personal liberties, even as it navigates the complexities of white-collar crime. The decision has been met with mixed reactions, sparking discussions on the legal processes surrounding economic offenses in India.

 Date of Decision: 17 November, 2023

AJAY KUMAR VS STATE NCT OF DELHI                          

Latest Legal News