Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

High Court of Delhi Grants Bail in High-Profile Amrapali Group Fraud Case - Key Director Released After Years in Custody

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the primacy of personal liberty, the Delhi High Court today granted bail to a director of the beleaguered Amrapali Group, involved in a major real estate scandal. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Bansal, emphasized the principle that “bail is the rule and jail is an exception”, highlighting the judiciary’s stance on the balance between personal liberty and the demands of justice.

The Court’s decision comes in the wake of allegations of fraud, cheating, and criminal breach of trust against the directors of the Amrapali Group, related to their residential projects. The Court observed that despite the gravity of the accusations, the lack of specific allegations against the applicant in financial matters and the documentary nature of the evidence reduced the risk of evidence tampering.

Justice Bansal, in his judgment, noted, “The right to speedy trial and justice has been recognized as a fundamental right,” citing the Supreme Court’s judgment in Sanjay Chandra v. CBI. This observation was pivotal in deciding the bail application, reflecting the court’s approach towards ensuring timely justice.

The applicant had been in judicial custody since October 2018, and the Court acknowledged his cooperative behavior during the investigation process. The decision to grant bail also took into account the substantial amount already recovered from the applicant and his family, in compliance with a Supreme Court order.

This ruling is expected to set a precedent in cases involving corporate fraud, with the judiciary reaffirming its commitment to uphold personal liberties, even as it navigates the complexities of white-collar crime. The decision has been met with mixed reactions, sparking discussions on the legal processes surrounding economic offenses in India.

 Date of Decision: 17 November, 2023

AJAY KUMAR VS STATE NCT OF DELHI                          

Latest Legal News