Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

High Court of Delhi Acquits Petitioner in Cheque Bounce Case, Recognizes Settlement and Compounding

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Delhi, led by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Jain, has acquitted Mr. Devender Sharma in a revision petition concerning a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court's decision acknowledges the settlement between the parties and the compounding of the offence.

Legal Framework and Context: The petitioner, Devender Sharma, faced conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonor. The revision petition was filed under Section 397, read with Sections 401 & 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Settlement and Compounding: The Court noted that while the petitioner was in custody, a settlement was reached with the complainant. An application for compounding the offence was filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Effect of Compounding: The Court, acknowledging the settlement terms, allowed the compounding application, resulting in the acquittal of the petitioner as per Section 320(8) of the Cr.P.C.

Payment and Costs: The petitioner had paid Rs. 4,72,000 as part of the settlement. Following the guidelines from previous judgments, the Court directed the petitioner to pay an additional 10% of the cheque amount as costs.

Condonation of Delay: The Court condoned the delay in filing the revision petitions, with the respondents' consent, to avoid prejudice to their rights and contentions.

Compensation and Sentence: Initially, the petitioner was sentenced to six months of simple imprisonment and ordered to pay double the cheque amount, Rs. 90,000, as compensation.

Court’s Observations on Settlement: The Court carefully examined the settlement agreement, observing that the complainant had received the entire settlement amount without coercion, and agreed to compound the matter.

Reduction in Cost Percentage: Recognizing the petitioner's custody since November 25, 2023, and the absence of other criminal antecedents, the Court reduced the cost from the standard 15% to 10%.

The petition was disposed of with the petitioner's acquittal and instructions for his release, subject to his not being required in any other case. Additionally, the petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 27,000 to the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee as costs.

Date of Decision: March 27, 2024

Devender Sharma vs. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

 

Latest Legal News