Married Daughter Cannot Be Excluded From Compassionate Appointment Solely On The Ground Of Marriage: Chhattisgarh High Court Allahabad HC Condemns Lawyers Seeking Adjournments To Attend District Courts Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Invoked For Restoration Of Possession When Statutory Remedy Of Restitution Exists: Calcutta High Court Invoke Preventive Detention Laws Against Sand Mining Kingpins: Supreme Court Directs ED Probe To Protect Chambal Sanctuary Res Judicata Bars Pendente Lite Purchaser From Re-Agitating Impleadment Under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC If Rejected Under Order I Rule 10: Supreme Court Consumer Complaints Can Continue Against Promoters & Co-Developers Even If Corporate Debtor Is Under IBC Moratorium: Supreme Court IBC Moratorium Protects Only Corporate Debtor, Does Not Bar Consumer Complaints Against Promoters & Directors: Supreme Court Vehicle Registration Certificate Relevant But Not Conclusive For Deciding Interim Custody Under Section 451 CrPC: Supreme Court Lawyer Has No Unqualified Right To Continuous Presence During Entire Interrogation Under Section 38 BNSS: Supreme Court Mandating Continuous Videography Of Accused During Transit Is Unworkable, May Lead To Unfounded Allegations: Supreme Court Centre Introduces FCRA Amendment Bill 2026: Proposes Vesting Of Defunct NGO Assets In 'Designated Authority', Mandates Prior Nod For Probe Written Communication Of Grounds Of Arrest Not Mandatory For Arrests Prior To SC's 'Mihir Rajesh Shah' Judgment: Orissa High Court Passing Ex-Parte Maintenance Order Without Verifying Status Of WhatsApp Or Email Notice Violates Natural Justice: Madhya Pradesh High Court Training ChatGPT On Copyrighted News Is 'Fair Dealing', Does Not Amount To Infringement: Delhi High Court Refuses To Enjoin OpenAI Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rethinking Access to Justice: Proposing a Client-Choice Bar-Integrated Model as a Viable Alternative to the LADC System Delhi Police Grants Permission To Advocates To Protest At Jantar Mantar On August 7 Over LADC Concerns Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

High Court of Delhi Acquits Petitioner in Cheque Bounce Case, Recognizes Settlement and Compounding

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Delhi, led by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Jain, has acquitted Mr. Devender Sharma in a revision petition concerning a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court's decision acknowledges the settlement between the parties and the compounding of the offence.

Legal Framework and Context: The petitioner, Devender Sharma, faced conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonor. The revision petition was filed under Section 397, read with Sections 401 & 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Settlement and Compounding: The Court noted that while the petitioner was in custody, a settlement was reached with the complainant. An application for compounding the offence was filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Effect of Compounding: The Court, acknowledging the settlement terms, allowed the compounding application, resulting in the acquittal of the petitioner as per Section 320(8) of the Cr.P.C.

Payment and Costs: The petitioner had paid Rs. 4,72,000 as part of the settlement. Following the guidelines from previous judgments, the Court directed the petitioner to pay an additional 10% of the cheque amount as costs.

Condonation of Delay: The Court condoned the delay in filing the revision petitions, with the respondents' consent, to avoid prejudice to their rights and contentions.

Compensation and Sentence: Initially, the petitioner was sentenced to six months of simple imprisonment and ordered to pay double the cheque amount, Rs. 90,000, as compensation.

Court’s Observations on Settlement: The Court carefully examined the settlement agreement, observing that the complainant had received the entire settlement amount without coercion, and agreed to compound the matter.

Reduction in Cost Percentage: Recognizing the petitioner's custody since November 25, 2023, and the absence of other criminal antecedents, the Court reduced the cost from the standard 15% to 10%.

The petition was disposed of with the petitioner's acquittal and instructions for his release, subject to his not being required in any other case. Additionally, the petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 27,000 to the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee as costs.

Date of Decision: March 27, 2024

Devender Sharma vs. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

 

Latest Legal News