State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 License Fee on Hoardings is Regulatory, Not Tax; GST Does Not Bar Municipal Levy: Bombay High Court Filing Forged Bank Statement to Mislead Court in Maintenance Case Is Prima Facie Offence Under Section 466 IPC: Allahabad High Court Upholds Summoning Continued Cruelty and Concealment of Infertility Justify Divorce: Chhattisgarh High Court Upholds Divorce Disguising Punishment as Simplicity Is Abuse of Power: Delhi High Court Quashes Dismissals of Civil Defence Volunteers for Being Stigmatic, Not Simpliciter Marriage Cannot Be Perpetuated on Paper When Cohabitation Has Ceased for Decades: Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Grant Divorce Despite Wife’s Opposition Ownership of Trucks Does Not Mean Windfall Compensation: Supreme Court Slashes Inflated Motor Accident Award in Absence of Documentary Proof Concealment of Mortgage Is Fraud, Not a Technical Omission: Supreme Court Restores Refund Decree, Slams High Court’s Remand State Reorganization Does Not Automatically Convert Cooperative Societies into Multi-State Entities: Supreme Court Rejects Blanket Interpretation of Section 103 Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication

High Court of Calcutta Invalidates Rent Compensation Memos, Orders Fresh Determination Due to ‘Flawed Process’

23 December 2024 11:59 AM

By: Deepak Kumar


Lack of proper measurement procedures cited as primary reason for overturning previous assessments in the Kolkata Municipal Corporation case.

The High Court of Calcutta has directed a fresh determination of rent compensation for the premises at 42, Ripon Street, Kolkata, following an appeal by the Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC). The court invalidated previous assessments due to inadequate measurement procedures and emphasized the necessity of accurate evaluations as per legal directives.

The appeals stem from a protracted legal battle involving the requisition and compensation of property owned by Rameshwar Properties Private Limited. Initially requisitioned under the Defence of India Rules in 1939 and later under the West Bengal Premises Requisition and Control Act, the property was used by KMC for several years. Disputes over rent compensation led to multiple legal proceedings, culminating in the current appeals against the rent assessments made by the First Land Acquisition Collector.


The court underscored the importance of proper measurement procedures in rent compensation determinations. “The calculation which has been made without measurement being taken cannot be the basis of a meaningful determination and the entire exercise was a farce,” observed the Division Bench, highlighting the need for accurate evaluations to ensure just compensation.

The court found that the previous assessments, including memos dated 12th August 2021, 29th December 2020, and 29th June 2021, were flawed due to the lack of proper measurement of the premises. “The direction of the Division Bench contained in the order dated 28.01.2020 was not properly construed by the First LA Collector,” noted the court, emphasizing that no meaningful determination could be made without actual measurements of the rentable structure.

The judgment referenced the principles outlined in previous cases, stressing the necessity of adhering to proper procedures for rent determination. The court directed the First Land Acquisition Collector to undertake a fresh determination of rent compensation, aligning with the directives of the Division Bench’s previous judgment.

Justice Apurba Sinha Ray remarked, “The issuance of the letter dated 19th July 2022 for further inspection of the premises shows that the decision taken by the LA Collector was not proper and appropriate. When the administrative authority had decided a matter and communicated the same, it does not have the power to reopen the issue without recalling its earlier order.”

The High Court of Calcutta’s decision to order a fresh determination of rent compensation underscores the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring fair and accurate evaluations in property requisition cases. By invalidating previous assessments due to procedural flaws, the judgment emphasizes the necessity of adhering to legal directives and proper measurement protocols. This landmark decision is expected to influence future cases, reinforcing the importance of meticulous procedural adherence in rent compensation determinations.

Date of Decision: July 11, 2024
 

Latest Legal News