Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

High Court Grants Statutory Bail in NDPS Cases Citing “Incomplete Challan” Due to Absence of FSL Report

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Lekhika


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted statutory bail to petitioners involved in cases under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vikas Suri, centered on the interpretation of an “incomplete challan” due to the absence of a Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report, impacting the right to statutory bail.

The judgment pertained to three separate petitions (CRR-2161-2023, CRR-2390-2023, and CRR-2350-2023) involving a common legal issue arising from the seizure of substances deemed as commercial quantities under the NDPS Act. The pivotal point of the judgment was the non-submission of the FSL report within the mandated 180 days of arrest, which the Court found crucial for a complete investigation.

Justice Suri observed, “Challan not accompanied by FSL report cannot be regarded as complete.” This observation led to the conclusion that the petitioners were entitled to statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The ruling emphasized the importance of timely completion of investigation reports, especially in cases involving serious charges like those under the NDPS Act.

The Court’s decision also referenced several Supreme Court rulings, underscoring the judiciary’s stance on the criticality of complete investigation reports for fair trial procedures. The High Court followed the Supreme Court’s interpretation in granting bail, with a provision for recall based on future Supreme Court decisions in related matters.

Date of Decision: 31.10.2023

Taswwar Khan VS State of Haryana   

Latest Legal News