Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

High Court Grants Statutory Bail in NDPS Cases Citing “Incomplete Challan” Due to Absence of FSL Report

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Lekhika


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted statutory bail to petitioners involved in cases under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vikas Suri, centered on the interpretation of an “incomplete challan” due to the absence of a Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report, impacting the right to statutory bail.

The judgment pertained to three separate petitions (CRR-2161-2023, CRR-2390-2023, and CRR-2350-2023) involving a common legal issue arising from the seizure of substances deemed as commercial quantities under the NDPS Act. The pivotal point of the judgment was the non-submission of the FSL report within the mandated 180 days of arrest, which the Court found crucial for a complete investigation.

Justice Suri observed, “Challan not accompanied by FSL report cannot be regarded as complete.” This observation led to the conclusion that the petitioners were entitled to statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The ruling emphasized the importance of timely completion of investigation reports, especially in cases involving serious charges like those under the NDPS Act.

The Court’s decision also referenced several Supreme Court rulings, underscoring the judiciary’s stance on the criticality of complete investigation reports for fair trial procedures. The High Court followed the Supreme Court’s interpretation in granting bail, with a provision for recall based on future Supreme Court decisions in related matters.

Date of Decision: 31.10.2023

Taswwar Khan VS State of Haryana   

Latest Legal News