MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

High Court Grants Statutory Bail in NDPS Cases Citing “Incomplete Challan” Due to Absence of FSL Report

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Lekhika


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted statutory bail to petitioners involved in cases under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vikas Suri, centered on the interpretation of an “incomplete challan” due to the absence of a Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report, impacting the right to statutory bail.

The judgment pertained to three separate petitions (CRR-2161-2023, CRR-2390-2023, and CRR-2350-2023) involving a common legal issue arising from the seizure of substances deemed as commercial quantities under the NDPS Act. The pivotal point of the judgment was the non-submission of the FSL report within the mandated 180 days of arrest, which the Court found crucial for a complete investigation.

Justice Suri observed, “Challan not accompanied by FSL report cannot be regarded as complete.” This observation led to the conclusion that the petitioners were entitled to statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The ruling emphasized the importance of timely completion of investigation reports, especially in cases involving serious charges like those under the NDPS Act.

The Court’s decision also referenced several Supreme Court rulings, underscoring the judiciary’s stance on the criticality of complete investigation reports for fair trial procedures. The High Court followed the Supreme Court’s interpretation in granting bail, with a provision for recall based on future Supreme Court decisions in related matters.

Date of Decision: 31.10.2023

Taswwar Khan VS State of Haryana   

Latest Legal News