Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

High Court Grants Regular Bail to Afghan Residents Charged with Overstaying in India

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh granted regular bail to a group of Afghan residents who were charged with overstaying in India. The case, registered under Sections 7 and 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946, and Section 12(1A) of the Passports Act, 1967, involved allegations of residing in India without valid passports and visas.

The judge, while granting bail, made it clear that this decision does not express any opinion on the merits of the case. Justice Manoj Bajaj stated, “It is not a case that the petitioners were indulging in any illegal activities or commission of crime, and they are being prosecuted for overstaying in India after the expiry of their passport and visa.”

Justice Manoj Bajaj, presiding over the case, emphasized that the petitioners were not involved in any illegal activities or criminal offenses. The court noted that the trial had been progressing slowly, with only two out of nine prosecution witnesses examined thus far. Taking into consideration the extended period of detention and the likelihood of a protracted trial, the court determined that further detention would serve no useful purpose.

The defense counsel argued that the petitioners, who are residents of Afghanistan, have been residing in India for a long time and were implicated solely due to the expiration of their visas and passports.

The court order, released on 4th July 2023, ordered the release of the petitioners on regular bail, subject to the fulfillment of requisite bail bonds or surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court or duty magistrate concerned.

This judgment highlights the court’s consideration of the circumstances and the necessity to avoid prolonged detention for individuals accused of overstaying their visas. It reinforces the principle that each case should be assessed on its own merits, and bail decisions should be made in light of the specific circumstances involved.

Date of decision : 04.07.2023

Mohammad Rahim Ashori vs State of Haryana

Latest Legal News