Granting Bail Does Not Shield Foreign Nationals from Executive Action on Visa Violations: Delhi High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Misused to Resolve Substantive Disputes or Replace Execution Mechanisms: P&H High Court Eviction Proceedings Must Follow Principles of Natural Justice: Telangana High Court Quashes Eviction Order under Senior Citizens Act Limitation Law | Sufficient Cause Cannot Be Liberally Interpreted If Negligence or Inaction Is Apparent: Gujarat High Court Mere Pendency of Lease Renewal Requests Does Not Constitute Bona Fide Dispute: Calcutta High Court Upholds Eviction Proceedings Under Public Premises Act CGST | Declaratory Nature of Safari Retreats Ruling Mandates Reassessment of Input Tax Credit Claims: Kerala High Court Changing Rules of the Game Mid-Way Violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution: Rajasthan High Court Disapproval of a Relationship Does Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide Without Direct Instigation or Mens Rea: Supreme Court Limitation Period Under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act Cannot Defeat Victim’s Right to Compensation: Gujarat High Court Maintenance To Wife Cannot Be a Precondition for Bail: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 438 CrPC Court Cannot Rewrite Contract When Vendor Lacks Ownership of the Property: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance Royalty Can Be Levied on Minor Minerals Like Brick Earth, Irrespective of Land Ownership: Supreme Court Bail in Heinous Crimes Must Be Granted with Adequate Reasons and Judicial Scrutiny: Supreme Court Judicial Review in Disciplinary Cases Is Limited to Fairness, Not Reappreciation of Evidence: Supreme Court

High Court Grants Regular Bail Based on Parity and Length of Custody in NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has granted regular bail to the petitioner, Gurmeet Singh, in a case registered under Sections 15 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The judgment, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Avneesh Jhingan on 14th July, 2023, considered the petitioner's claim of parity with a co-accused and the length of custody as crucial factors in the bail decision.

Quoting from the judgment, Justice Avneesh Jhingan stated, "On the basis of parity of petitioner vis-a-vis co-accused so far as grant of bail is concerned and though the investigation is complete, conclusion of trial is likely to take time, the petitioner is granted bail subject to his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned."

The court further clarified that the grant of bail does not express any opinion on the merits of the case and that the trial would proceed independently. The petitioner was ordered to abide by certain conditions, including not tampering with evidence, not pressurizing witnesses, and appearing before the trial court as required.

The decision of the High Court relied on previous judgments from the Hon'ble Supreme Court, emphasizing the significance of custody duration in bail decisions under the NDPS Act, 1985. Justice Jhingan cited cases where bail was granted based on the length of custody, even in the face of the stringent provisions of the NDPS Act.

The judgment, which grants relief to Gurmeet Singh after two years, five months, and 27 days of custody, highlights the court's commitment to upholding individual rights enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The court considered the potential violation of the petitioner's right to liberty and concluded that further incarceration would be unjust.

It is important to note that the judgment does not express any opinion on the merits of the case, and the trial will proceed independently. The decision is expected to have a significant impact on future bail applications in similar cases, providing an avenue for individuals to seek relief based on custody duration and parity with co-accused.

Date of Decision: 14th July, 2023

Gurmeet Singh vs State of Punjab

Similar News