MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

High Court Grants Regular Bail Based on Parity and Length of Custody in NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has granted regular bail to the petitioner, Gurmeet Singh, in a case registered under Sections 15 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The judgment, delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Avneesh Jhingan on 14th July, 2023, considered the petitioner's claim of parity with a co-accused and the length of custody as crucial factors in the bail decision.

Quoting from the judgment, Justice Avneesh Jhingan stated, "On the basis of parity of petitioner vis-a-vis co-accused so far as grant of bail is concerned and though the investigation is complete, conclusion of trial is likely to take time, the petitioner is granted bail subject to his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned."

The court further clarified that the grant of bail does not express any opinion on the merits of the case and that the trial would proceed independently. The petitioner was ordered to abide by certain conditions, including not tampering with evidence, not pressurizing witnesses, and appearing before the trial court as required.

The decision of the High Court relied on previous judgments from the Hon'ble Supreme Court, emphasizing the significance of custody duration in bail decisions under the NDPS Act, 1985. Justice Jhingan cited cases where bail was granted based on the length of custody, even in the face of the stringent provisions of the NDPS Act.

The judgment, which grants relief to Gurmeet Singh after two years, five months, and 27 days of custody, highlights the court's commitment to upholding individual rights enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The court considered the potential violation of the petitioner's right to liberty and concluded that further incarceration would be unjust.

It is important to note that the judgment does not express any opinion on the merits of the case, and the trial will proceed independently. The decision is expected to have a significant impact on future bail applications in similar cases, providing an avenue for individuals to seek relief based on custody duration and parity with co-accused.

Date of Decision: 14th July, 2023

Gurmeet Singh vs State of Punjab

Latest Legal News