District Judiciary Retirement Age | Supreme Court Directs Enhancement To 62 Years To Arrest Attrition Of Judicial Talent Slogans Inciting Armed Rebellion Or Challenging Sovereignty Cannot Be Equated With Religious Expressions: Allahabad High Court Denies Bail Revisional Authority Under AP ROR Act Has Jurisdiction To Direct Inquiry Into Illegal Transfers Of Assigned Land: Andhra Pradesh High Court Indian Law Does Not Recognise 'Joint Parenting' As A Statutory Concept; Child Welfare Remains Paramount: Bombay High Court Order 26 Rule 9 CPC | Court Must Appoint Survey-Knowing Commissioner In Suits Alleging Physical Encroachment And Boundary Disputes: Calcutta High Court Section 33-C(2) ID Act | Labour Court Has Jurisdiction To Recover Consequential Benefits Arising From CAT Orders: Delhi High Court Order VIII Rule 1-A(3) CPC | Procedural Law Is Meant For Advancement Of Justice; Technicalities Should Not Scuttle Opportunity To Lead Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court High Court Can Condition Condonation Of Delay In Land Acquisition Appeals Upon Waiver Of Interest For Delayed Period: Bombay High Court Employees Compensation Act | Insurance Company Not Liable To Indemnify Penalty Imposed On Employer Under Section 4-A(3)(b): Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees’ Compensation Act | Failure To Frame Issue On Employer-Employee Relationship Vitiates Commissioner’s Award: Kerala High Court Default Bail Under Section 187 BNSS | Period Of Investigation Depends On Substance Of Allegations In FIR, Not Merely Mentioned Sections: Madhya Pradesh High Court SARFAESI Act | Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Must Be Challenged Under Section 17 Before DRT, Not Via Writ Petition: Kerala High Court

High Court Grants Red Bull AG Injunction Against "SEVEN HOURS," Says "Chances of Confusion are Very High"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has granted Red Bull AG, the Swiss energy drink company, an injunction against Rohidas Popat Kapadnis & ANR., the manufacturers of 'SEVEN HOURS' energy drinks. The court cited that the "chances of confusion are very high," particularly in online platforms.

Justice Prathiba M. Singh observed that the silver and blue color combination used by the Defendants for their energy drink cans is identical to that of Red Bull. The Court said, "the colour combination of blue and silver is enjoying statutory protection in favor of the Plaintiff."

Red Bull AG, which had sales of over Rs. 180 crores in India in 2022 and holds a market share of 44.2% in the energy drink segment, filed the suit stating the Defendants had copied their distinctive blue and silver color scheme. "The balance of convenience lies in favor of the Plaintiff, and irreparable injury would be caused to the Plaintiff if the interim injunction is not granted," the Court noted in its ruling.

The Court also appointed a Local Commissioner to seize the infringing products. However, filled cans already manufactured by the Defendants will be allowed to be sold off, but no new products in the disputed packaging will be allowed to be manufactured.

This is not the first time Red Bull AG has sought legal protection for its trademark color combination. The company has previously secured similar orders protecting its blue and silver color scheme.

As per the Court's directive, the Defendants have been instructed to deposit Rs. 3 lakhs with the Registrar General of the Court.

Date of Decision: October 16, 2023

RED BULL AG vs ROHIDAS POPAT KAPADNIS & ANR.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/16-Oct-2023-Redbull-DelHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News