Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

High Court Grants Red Bull AG Injunction Against "SEVEN HOURS," Says "Chances of Confusion are Very High"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has granted Red Bull AG, the Swiss energy drink company, an injunction against Rohidas Popat Kapadnis & ANR., the manufacturers of 'SEVEN HOURS' energy drinks. The court cited that the "chances of confusion are very high," particularly in online platforms.

Justice Prathiba M. Singh observed that the silver and blue color combination used by the Defendants for their energy drink cans is identical to that of Red Bull. The Court said, "the colour combination of blue and silver is enjoying statutory protection in favor of the Plaintiff."

Red Bull AG, which had sales of over Rs. 180 crores in India in 2022 and holds a market share of 44.2% in the energy drink segment, filed the suit stating the Defendants had copied their distinctive blue and silver color scheme. "The balance of convenience lies in favor of the Plaintiff, and irreparable injury would be caused to the Plaintiff if the interim injunction is not granted," the Court noted in its ruling.

The Court also appointed a Local Commissioner to seize the infringing products. However, filled cans already manufactured by the Defendants will be allowed to be sold off, but no new products in the disputed packaging will be allowed to be manufactured.

This is not the first time Red Bull AG has sought legal protection for its trademark color combination. The company has previously secured similar orders protecting its blue and silver color scheme.

As per the Court's directive, the Defendants have been instructed to deposit Rs. 3 lakhs with the Registrar General of the Court.

Date of Decision: October 16, 2023

RED BULL AG vs ROHIDAS POPAT KAPADNIS & ANR.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/16-Oct-2023-Redbull-DelHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News