Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

High Court Grants Red Bull AG Injunction Against "SEVEN HOURS," Says "Chances of Confusion are Very High"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has granted Red Bull AG, the Swiss energy drink company, an injunction against Rohidas Popat Kapadnis & ANR., the manufacturers of 'SEVEN HOURS' energy drinks. The court cited that the "chances of confusion are very high," particularly in online platforms.

Justice Prathiba M. Singh observed that the silver and blue color combination used by the Defendants for their energy drink cans is identical to that of Red Bull. The Court said, "the colour combination of blue and silver is enjoying statutory protection in favor of the Plaintiff."

Red Bull AG, which had sales of over Rs. 180 crores in India in 2022 and holds a market share of 44.2% in the energy drink segment, filed the suit stating the Defendants had copied their distinctive blue and silver color scheme. "The balance of convenience lies in favor of the Plaintiff, and irreparable injury would be caused to the Plaintiff if the interim injunction is not granted," the Court noted in its ruling.

The Court also appointed a Local Commissioner to seize the infringing products. However, filled cans already manufactured by the Defendants will be allowed to be sold off, but no new products in the disputed packaging will be allowed to be manufactured.

This is not the first time Red Bull AG has sought legal protection for its trademark color combination. The company has previously secured similar orders protecting its blue and silver color scheme.

As per the Court's directive, the Defendants have been instructed to deposit Rs. 3 lakhs with the Registrar General of the Court.

Date of Decision: October 16, 2023

RED BULL AG vs ROHIDAS POPAT KAPADNIS & ANR.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/16-Oct-2023-Redbull-DelHC.pdf"]

Similar News