Absence of Videography Alone Not Sufficient For Bail When Custody is Less Than a Year: Delhi High Court Refuses Bail in Commercial Quantity Heroin Use of Permitted Synthetic Colour in Dal Masur Still Constitutes Adulteration: Punjab & Haryana High Court Uphold Conviction Penalty Must Not Result in Civil Death of Professionals: Delhi High Court Reduces Two-Year Suspension of Insolvency Professional, Citing Disproportionate Punishment Right of Cross-Examination is Statutory, Cannot Be Denied When Documents Are Exhibited Later: Chhattisgarh High Court Allows Re-Cross-Examination Compounding after Adjudication is Impermissible under FEMA: Calcutta High Court Declines Post-Adjudication Compounding Plea Tears of a Child Speak Louder Than Words: Bombay HC Confirms Life Term for Man Who Raped 4-Year-Old Alleged Dowry Death After Forced Remarriage: Allahabad High Court Finds No Evidence of Strangulation or Demand “Even If Executant Has No Title, Registrar Must Register the Document If Formalities Are Met” — Supreme Court  Declares Tamil Nadu's Rule 55A(i) Ultra Vires the Registration Act, 1908 Res Judicata Is Not Optional – It’s Public Policy: Supreme Court Slams SEBI for Passing Second Final Order in Fraud Case Against Vital Communications Ltd A Person Has Died… Insurance Company Cannot Escape Liability Without Proving Policy Violation: Supreme Court Slams High Court for Exonerating Insurer in Fatal Accident Case Calling Someone by Caste Name Is Not Enough – It Must Be Publicly Done to Attract SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Acquits All in Jharkhand Land Dispute Case Broken Promises Don’t Make Rape – Mature Adults in Long-Term Relationships Must Accept Responsibility: Supreme Court Quashes Rape Case Against NRI Man Every Broken Relationship Can’t Be Branded Rape: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Retired Judge Accused of Sexual Exploitation on Promise of Marriage No Evidence, No Motive, Not Even Proof of Murder: Supreme Court Slams Conviction, Acquits Man Accused of Killing Wife After Two Years of Marriage You Can’t Assume Silence Is Consent: Supreme Court Sends Back ₹46 Lakh Insurance Dispute to NCDRC for Fresh Determination “Voyage Must Start and End Before Monsoon Sets In — But What If That’s Practically Impossible?” SC Rules Against Insurance Company in Shipping Dispute No Criminal Case Can Be Built on a Land Deal That’s Three Decades Old Without Specific Allegations: Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of FIR Against Ex-JK Housing Chief

High Court Grants Probate for Registered Will - Upholding Validity and Execution

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the High Court of Delhi has granted probate for a registered Will, affirming its validity and execution. The judgement, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri, has settled a crucial legal dispute surrounding the testamentary document. The case, titled Test.Cas. 4/2017, involved Mrs. Sharda Relan as the appellant seeking probate of the Will executed by her deceased husband, late Sh. Narinder Dev Relan.

The court carefully considered the evidence presented by the petitioner, who relied on the attestation of the Will by two witnesses and its registration on 22nd March 2012. The Will encompassed all the assets of the deceased, and a comprehensive list of these assets was submitted to the court. The court examined the testimony of an attesting witness, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Rastogi, who confirmed the execution and authenticity of the Will.

“The petitioner has been able to prove the Will of the deceased as his last and final testament,” stated Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri. The court highlighted that the respondent did not challenge the genuineness or validity of the Will and did not provide any evidence to rebut the petitioner’s case. Additionally, the court referred to Section 68 of the Evidence Act, which allows the proof of a Will by examining only one attesting witness.

“This decision establishes the principle that the due execution of a Will can be proved by examining any one of the attesting witnesses,” the court emphasized, citing a recent Supreme Court judgment (Murthy v. C. Saradambal). The court further clarified the limited scope of its jurisdiction in testamentary matters, stating that it does not interpret the Will or determine the title of the deceased to the bequeathed properties.

The judgement also touched upon the applicability of res judicata, noting that the principle applies not only to separate proceedings but also to subsequent stages of the same proceedings. Thus, the court declined to entertain objections that were beyond the jurisdiction of the testamentary case.

With the court finding no impediment in concluding the validity and execution of the Will, probate was granted, subject to the payment of necessary stamp duty and court fees. The court ordered the petitioner to furnish an administrative bond, and the probate would be issued upon completion of formalities.

This decision has significant implications for probate cases, clarifying the evidentiary requirements for proving the execution and validity of a Will. It reaffirms the importance of proper attestation and registration, while respecting the testamentary jurisdiction of the court.

The judgement highlights the court’s role in the probate process, as Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri eloquently stated, “The court exercising testamentary jurisdiction neither interprets the Will nor decides the title of the deceased to the properties bequeathed.”

This judgement adds to the growing body of case law on testamentary matters and provides guidance for future probate cases. Legal experts are applauding the court’s decision, considering it a significant contribution to the jurisprudence surrounding Will execution and probate procedures.      

Date of Decision: 17th July 2023

MRS SHARDA RELAN  vs STATE & ORS              

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Mrs_Sharda_Relan_vs_State_Ors_on_17_July_2023_Del-HC.pdf"]

Similar News