MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Dowry Death Case - insufficient material evidence supporting the allegations of dowry demand and cruelty leading to the suicide of the deceased

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Bengaluru, 7th July 2023: In a significant ruling, the High Court of Karnataka granted bail to Mr. Manoj Kumar, the accused in a dowry death case, under Criminal Petition No. 4085 of 2023. The judgment, pronounced by the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Nawaz, highlighted the lack of substantiating evidence in support of the allegations made against the accused.

The case involved the unfortunate suicide of Meghana, the daughter of the first informant, following her marriage to Mr. Manoj Kumar. The prosecution alleged that Meghana was subjected to physical and mental torture by her husband and his mother, demanding additional dowry. However, upon examining the facts presented, the court noted that there was no material evidence to establish a demand for dowry at the time of the marriage.

The judgment further emphasized that the allegations of cruelty were not accompanied by specific timing and lacked time proximity to the deceased’s death. Additionally, there were no previous complaints lodged against the accused. The court observed that the allegations of additional dowry and physical abuse would require a full-fledged trial to establish their veracity.

The petitioner’s counsel argued that Meghana’s depression was primarily attributed to her inability to conceive even after three years of marriage. Medical documents supporting her treatment for infertility were submitted, further suggesting that the deceased’s mental state was connected to this issue. The court acknowledged these arguments and found no material to indicate cruelty related to dowry.

The court’s decision to grant bail was also influenced by the petitioner’s established businesses and financial stability. The petitioner, who had been in judicial custody since March 21, 2023, had undertaken to furnish adequate surety and committed to regular appearance before the trial court. The court imposed conditions, including refraining from tampering with prosecution witnesses and not engaging in any further offenses.

The judgment concluded by stating that the observations made in the order were confined to the disposal of the petition and would not influence the trial of the case.

Date of Decision: 7th July 2023

MANOJ KUMAR vs  STATE OF KARNATAKA

Latest Legal News