Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Medical Termination of Pregnancy on Grounds of Strained Relationship

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dismissed a writ petition (WPC No. 2768 of 2023) seeking permission for medical termination of pregnancy. The petitioner, a married woman aged about 29 years, had approached the court requesting the termination of her pregnancy. However, the court, presided over by Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy, ruled that the grounds presented by the petitioner, which primarily involved strained relationship issues, did not fall under the permissible grounds specified in Section 3(2)(a)(b) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

The court noted that the petitioner had conceived from her husband, as acknowledged in the pleadings of the writ petition and supported by the marriage certificate enclosed as evidence. The judgment highlighted that the petitioner did not claim any sex crime committed against her without her consent or knowledge.

Referring to Section 3(2)(a)(b) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, the court emphasized that the continuation of the pregnancy could be terminated if there was a risk to the life of the pregnant woman or if there was a substantial risk that the child would be born with severe physical or mental abnormalities. The court further pointed out that strained relationships or issues arising in a marriage were not valid grounds for seeking permission for medical termination of pregnancy under the Act.

Justice P. Sam Koshy observed that allowing such petitions on the grounds presented in this case would undermine the purpose and objectives of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. The judgment reaffirmed that in India, abortion is considered a crime, and medical practitioners are only authorized to perform abortions in situations where there is a serious risk to the life, physical health, or mental health of the pregnant woman, or if there is a substantial risk of severe deformities or diseases to the unborn child.

High  court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner failed to establish grounds that would warrant the grant of permission for medical termination of pregnancy. The judgment serves as a reminder of the limited circumstances under which abortion is permissible in India and the importance of adhering to the provisions outlined in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

Date of Decision: 22/06/2023

Xyz Nil  vs State Of Chhattisgarh

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/XYZ-v.-State-of-Chhattisgarh-^0-Ors-22-June-231.pdf"]

Latest Legal News