Advocates Cannot Threaten Judges With Corruption Allegations To Force Favourable Orders: Bombay High Court Holds Lawyers Guilty Of Criminal Contempt Co-Sharer Cannot Transfer Specific Portion Of Joint Land; Sale Operates Only As Transfer Of Undivided Share: Himachal Pradesh High Court Companies Act 2013 | Amount Due For Refund Post-Capital Reduction Does Not Qualify As Unclaimed Application Money For IEPF Transfer: Delhi High Court Seniority Cannot Be Claimed By Ad Hoc Or Temporary Employees Over Regularly Appointed Candidates: Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs Deposit Of Entire Enhanced Compensation In Land Acquisition Appeals To Balance Financial Liability And Landowners' Rights Succession To Bhumidhari Rights By Hindu Women Governed By Personal Law As It Stands On Date Of Demise: Supreme Court Hindu Widow’s Limited Life Interest In Agricultural Land Becomes Absolute Upon Enactment Of HSA 1956, Governs Devolution Under Delhi Land Reforms Act: Supreme Court Bodily Injury Under Section 165 MV Act Covers Both Temporary And Permanent Injuries Irrespective Of Disability Certification: Bombay High Court Testimony Of An Injured Witness Is A 'Sterling Witness' With A Built-In Guarantee Of Presence At The Scene Of Crime: Allahabad High Court Scrutiny Committee Has Inherent Power To Direct Re-Examination Of Documents During Caste Verification, Does Not Need To Discard Entire Vigilance Report: Bombay High Court Tender Cancellation Orders Must Be Reasoned; Affidavit Cannot Supplement Missing Reasons: Allahabad High Court Section 9 Of Arbitration Act Allows Interim Orders Against Non-Signatories To Preserve Subject Matter: Delhi High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Parsi Matrimonial Suit Can Be Dismissed At Threshold If Jurisdictional Fact Of Marriage Solemnisation In India Is Absent: Bombay High Court Section 125 CrPC | Maintenance Is A Social Welfare Measure To Prevent Destitution, Not A Tool For Financial Enrichment: Allahabad High Court Locus Standi To Challenge Tenancy Orders | Person With Registered Agreement For Sale Is An 'Aggrieved Person' Under BTAL Act: Bombay High Court State Legislature Lacks Competence To Levy Cess On Agricultural Produce Brought For Manufacturing Without Sale: Uttarakhand High Court Senior Citizens Act | Maintenance Order Attains Finality And Remains Executable Against Legal Heirs Post-Death Of Respondent: Telangana High Court Civil Court Cannot Grant Injunction Against SARFAESI Proceedings Even If Suit Property Title Is Disputed: Madhya Pradesh High Court Co-Accused Confession Without Recovery Hit By Section 23 BSA: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail In Robbery Case Section 28 Hindu Marriage Act | Appellate Court Can Set Aside Divorce Decree Upon Post-Decree Reconciliation Between Parties: Rajasthan High Court Failure To Collect Electronic Evidence Such As Call Detail Records In Offences Under Section 354 IPC Can Prove Fatal To Prosecution Case: Telangana High Court Mere Pendency Of Challenge To Sale Certificate Before DRT Does Not Bar Mutation Under OSS Rules: Orissa High Court Court May Impose Conditions On Minor’s Custody In Habeas Corpus Proceedings To Protect Best Interest Of Child: Madhya Pradesh High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Cannot Be Rejected For Lack Of Specific Particulars Or Res Judicata At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Surprise Check Without Prior FIR Registration Casts Doubt On Foundational Facts; Uncorroborated Approver Evidence Tainted: Madras High Court Acquits Former Protector Of Emigrants Appointment Of Lambardar | Appellate Authority Remanding Matter Must Not Pre-Judge Merits Of Candidates: Punjab & Haryana High Court Disciplinary Proceedings | Subsequent Deposit Of Embezzled Amount Does Not Exonerate Employee Or Efface Misconduct: Rajasthan High Court Order XXI Rule 37 CPC | Willful Evasion Of Decretal Debt Despite Having Means Justifies Arrest And Detention: Telangana High Court Claims For Recovery Of Stridhan Must Be Substantiated By Cogent Evidence, Not Merely Oral Assertion: Kerala High Court Concurrent Findings Of Fact Regarding Unproved Oral Family Settlement Cannot Be Re-Appreciated In Second Appeal: Punjab And Haryana High Court Limitation Act | Governmental Bureaucratic Delays Without Acceptable Explanation Cannot Be A Ground For Condoning Delay Under Section 5: Telangana High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Medical Termination of Pregnancy on Grounds of Strained Relationship

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dismissed a writ petition (WPC No. 2768 of 2023) seeking permission for medical termination of pregnancy. The petitioner, a married woman aged about 29 years, had approached the court requesting the termination of her pregnancy. However, the court, presided over by Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy, ruled that the grounds presented by the petitioner, which primarily involved strained relationship issues, did not fall under the permissible grounds specified in Section 3(2)(a)(b) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

The court noted that the petitioner had conceived from her husband, as acknowledged in the pleadings of the writ petition and supported by the marriage certificate enclosed as evidence. The judgment highlighted that the petitioner did not claim any sex crime committed against her without her consent or knowledge.

Referring to Section 3(2)(a)(b) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, the court emphasized that the continuation of the pregnancy could be terminated if there was a risk to the life of the pregnant woman or if there was a substantial risk that the child would be born with severe physical or mental abnormalities. The court further pointed out that strained relationships or issues arising in a marriage were not valid grounds for seeking permission for medical termination of pregnancy under the Act.

Justice P. Sam Koshy observed that allowing such petitions on the grounds presented in this case would undermine the purpose and objectives of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. The judgment reaffirmed that in India, abortion is considered a crime, and medical practitioners are only authorized to perform abortions in situations where there is a serious risk to the life, physical health, or mental health of the pregnant woman, or if there is a substantial risk of severe deformities or diseases to the unborn child.

High  court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner failed to establish grounds that would warrant the grant of permission for medical termination of pregnancy. The judgment serves as a reminder of the limited circumstances under which abortion is permissible in India and the importance of adhering to the provisions outlined in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

Date of Decision: 22/06/2023

Xyz Nil  vs State Of Chhattisgarh

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/XYZ-v.-State-of-Chhattisgarh-^0-Ors-22-June-231.pdf"]

Latest Legal News