Cheque Bounce Cases Should Ordinarily Be Sent To Mediation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Calls For Mediation In NI Act Matters 138 NI Act | Belated Plea Of Forged Signatures Cannot Be Used To Delay Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses Handwriting Expert Sections 332 & 333 IPC | Lawful Discharge Of Duty Must Be Proved, Mere Status As Public Servant Not Enough: Allahabad High Court Bus Conductor Accused of Assaulting Traffic Inspectors Custody With Biological Mother Cannot Ordinarily Be Treated As Illegal Detention: Delhi High Court Refuses Habeas Corpus For Return Of Child To Canada Foreign Custody Orders Must Yield To Welfare Of Child: Delhi High Court Refuses To Enforce Canadian Return Order Through Habeas Corpus Possible Criminal Racket Luring Young Girls Through Self-Proclaimed Peers And Tantriks Must Be Examined: J&K High Court Orders Wider Judicial Scrutiny Nomenclature Cannot Determine Constitutional Entitlement: Supreme Court Strikes Down Exclusion Of ‘Academic Arrangement’ Employees From Regularisation Testimony Of Related Witnesses Cannot Be Discarded Merely For Relationship: Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction 149 IPC | Presence In Unlawful Assembly Is Enough For Murder Liability”: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Directly Recruited Engineers Entitled To Seniority From Date Of Initial Appointment Including Training Period: Supreme Court Section 32 Evidence Act | If There Is Even An Iota Of Suspicion, Dying Declaration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court Framing A Case On Public Perceptions And Personal Predilections Ends Up In A Mess: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal In Alleged Parricide Arson Case When Oppression Petition Is Pending, Courts Must Ensure The Subject Matter Does Not Disappear Before Adjudication: Supreme Court Orders Status Quo In ₹1000 Crore Redevelopment Dispute Parties Cannot Participate In Arbitration And Later Challenge The Process Only After An Unfavourable Outcome : Supreme Court ICSID Clause Is Only A Fail-Safe Mechanism, Not A Restriction: Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal’s Constitution In MCGM Dispute Passive Euthanasia | 'Right To Die With Dignity Is An Intrinsic Facet Of Article 21': Supreme Court Permits Withdrawal Of Life Support Medical Board Must Record Reasons Before Denying Disability Pension To Armed Forces Personnel: Kerala High Court Grants Disability Pension To Air Force Corporal 138 NI Act | Directors Cannot Be Prosecuted If Company Is Not Made Accused: Allahabad High Court Quashes Cheque Bounce Cases Broad Daylight Removal of Goods by Known Creditors Is Not Theft: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Shopkeeper’s Insurance Claim Reservation Cannot Freeze Private Land Forever – Lapse Under Section 127 MRTP Act Operates Automatically: Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Transfer On Marriage Cannot Defeat Helper’s First Right To Promotion: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Anganwadi Helper’s Promotion Where Accusations Are Prima Facie True, Statutory Bar Under Section 43D(5) UAPA Operates; Bail Cannot Be Granted: Jharkhand High Court Bomb Hurled At Head Of Victim Shows Clear Intention To Kill: Kerala High Court Upholds Life Sentence In Kannur Political Murder Case Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment

High Court Dismisses Successive Petitions Seeking Quashing of FIR - Bar on Review and Limited Scope of Inherent Powers

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, has dismissed two successive petitions filed by the petitioners, Dharam Singh Meena and Vikas Kumar, seeking the quashing of FIR No. 476/2014 registered at Police Station Sadar, Jaipur South. The court, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand, based its decision on the bar on review and the limited scope of inherent powers under the relevant provisions of the law.

The petitioners had previously filed a similar petition in 2017, which was dismissed by the court. The court noted that under Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), it is prohibited from altering or reviewing a judgment or final order, except to correct clerical or arithmetical errors. The court stated that it lacked the authority to modify its earlier judgment, which had already disposed of the case.

Counsel for the petitioners argued that similar FIRs against the petitioners had been quashed by the Delhi High Court. However, the court held that the inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot be invoked to override the bar on review imposed by Section 362 Cr.P.C. The court emphasized that the inherent powers of the court cannot be exercised to do something specifically prohibited by the law.

High Court held that the successive petition seeking the same relief was not maintainable and dismissed both petitions. It further clarified that the court's inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot be utilized to set aside its own final order, which can only be done by the higher appellate authority.

This judgment underscores the importance of understanding the limitations placed on courts regarding the review of judgments and the exercise of inherent powers. It highlights the significance of bringing all relevant facts to the court's attention at the appropriate stage of the proceedings. The decision reaffirms the principle that inherent powers cannot be employed to circumvent statutory provisions.

Ruling by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan serves as a reminder of the legal framework governing the alteration or review of judgments and the boundaries of inherent powers in criminal matters.

Date of Decision: 11/01/2023

Dharam Singh Versus State Of Rajasthan,

Latest Legal News