Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

High Court Allows Writ Appeal, Sets Aside Illegal Continuation of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Retired Employee

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Judicature at Madras has allowed a writ appeal filed by T. Retnapandian, a retired employee, and set aside the illegal continuation of disciplinary proceedings against him. The judgment, delivered by the Hon'ble Mrs. Justice J. Nisha Banu and the Hon'ble Mr. Justice D. Bharathachakravarthy, emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural fairness and the rule of law.

Bench stated, "The continuation of the disciplinary proceedings against the appellant after retirement, especially when no charge is made out as per the Conduct Rules, is illegal." The court further clarified that the period of six months mentioned in the rule regarding the continuation of disciplinary proceedings is directory and not mandatory.

The case revolved around a charge memo issued to Mr. Retnapandian in 2004, alleging misconduct related to his wife's private construction business. The appellant denied the charges, arguing that the rule on which the charges were based did not apply to the period in question. The court agreed, ruling that the rule had come into force in 1994, while the instances mentioned in the charge memo occurred before that date.

Additionally, the court highlighted that the rule only prohibited employees from taking stockistships and forwarding agencies in benami names or engaging in money lending or private business. It did not extend to private business conducted by an employee's family member.

The judgment emphasized that the appellant had already retired in 2011, and the continuation of the disciplinary proceedings without paying him the subsistence allowance was unjustified. The court directed the respondents, Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited, to permit Mr. Retnapandian to retire from service and pay all retiral benefits within two months. In case of any delays, the court ordered the payment of arrears with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of superannuation.

This verdict sets a precedent, reaffirming the importance of fair treatment and adherence to the principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings. It highlights the need for careful consideration of the applicability of rules and the rights of retired employees. The judgment also serves as a reminder to employers to ensure the timely settlement of retiral benefits to retired employees.

The decision of the High Court in this writ appeal brings justice to Mr. Retnapandian, ensuring that he can retire with dignity and receive the benefits he rightfully deserves.

Date of Decision: June 21, 2023

 T.Retnapandian    vs Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/T.-Retnapandian-v.-Tamil-Nadu-Cements-Corporation-Mad.-HC-21-June-2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News