Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

High Court Allows Writ Appeal, Sets Aside Illegal Continuation of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Retired Employee

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Judicature at Madras has allowed a writ appeal filed by T. Retnapandian, a retired employee, and set aside the illegal continuation of disciplinary proceedings against him. The judgment, delivered by the Hon'ble Mrs. Justice J. Nisha Banu and the Hon'ble Mr. Justice D. Bharathachakravarthy, emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural fairness and the rule of law.

Bench stated, "The continuation of the disciplinary proceedings against the appellant after retirement, especially when no charge is made out as per the Conduct Rules, is illegal." The court further clarified that the period of six months mentioned in the rule regarding the continuation of disciplinary proceedings is directory and not mandatory.

The case revolved around a charge memo issued to Mr. Retnapandian in 2004, alleging misconduct related to his wife's private construction business. The appellant denied the charges, arguing that the rule on which the charges were based did not apply to the period in question. The court agreed, ruling that the rule had come into force in 1994, while the instances mentioned in the charge memo occurred before that date.

Additionally, the court highlighted that the rule only prohibited employees from taking stockistships and forwarding agencies in benami names or engaging in money lending or private business. It did not extend to private business conducted by an employee's family member.

The judgment emphasized that the appellant had already retired in 2011, and the continuation of the disciplinary proceedings without paying him the subsistence allowance was unjustified. The court directed the respondents, Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited, to permit Mr. Retnapandian to retire from service and pay all retiral benefits within two months. In case of any delays, the court ordered the payment of arrears with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of superannuation.

This verdict sets a precedent, reaffirming the importance of fair treatment and adherence to the principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings. It highlights the need for careful consideration of the applicability of rules and the rights of retired employees. The judgment also serves as a reminder to employers to ensure the timely settlement of retiral benefits to retired employees.

The decision of the High Court in this writ appeal brings justice to Mr. Retnapandian, ensuring that he can retire with dignity and receive the benefits he rightfully deserves.

Date of Decision: June 21, 2023

 T.Retnapandian    vs Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/T.-Retnapandian-v.-Tamil-Nadu-Cements-Corporation-Mad.-HC-21-June-2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News