High Court Allows Revision, Denies Maintenance Claim in Landmark Ruling

In a significant development, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur has allowed a revision petition and set aside a maintenance order under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.). The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Smt. Justice Anuradha Shukla on the 5^th of July, 2023, highlights the importance of settlement in divorce decrees and the voluntary surrender of maintenance rights.

The revision petition was filed by Sanjay Shrivastava, the applicant and husband, challenging the order granting maintenance to his former wife, Smt. Pratibha Shrivastava, the respondent. The Court carefully examined the facts of the case and identified key legal principles related to maintenance claims.

Quoting from the judgment, the Court emphasized, “The dispute about future maintenance was already settled by the decision of the Family Court... the respondent/wife had very evidently exercised that right at the time of making the decision of divorce.” The Court recognized that the respondent had voluntarily relinquished her right to future maintenance in the divorce decree, and there was no evidence of coercion or undue influence.

The Court also highlighted the failure of the lower court to consider economic principles. Referring to the payment made in 2005, the Court observed, “The value of Rs.50,000/- paid in the year 2005 cannot be appreciated in the scales of the current value of money.” The Court noted that the lower court failed to take into account the impact of inflation and the devaluation of money over time.

Moreover, the judgment emphasized the need to streamline maintenance orders and avoid conflicting obligations on the husband. Quoting from the judgment, the Court highlighted the importance of avoiding multiple maintenance orders under different enactments.

The Court’s decision to set aside the maintenance order and uphold the settlement in the divorce decree has significant implications for future maintenance claims. The judgment establishes the importance of considering prior settlements, economic factors, and the voluntary surrender of maintenance rights.

Legal experts have hailed this ruling as a landmark decision, providing clarity on the interpretation and application of maintenance laws. The judgment serves as a precedent, ensuring that maintenance claims are assessed in light of previous settlements and economic factors, ultimately promoting fairness and consistency in family law matters.

D,D.05.07.2023

SANJAY vs SMT. PRATIBHA