Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Haryana's 75% Local Job Quota Act Struck Down: P&H High Court Declared Unconstitutional Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020 To Upholds Constitutional Morality and National Unity

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court declared The Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020, unconstitutional, upholding the fundamental principles of equality, non-discrimination, and freedom of profession enshrined in the Constitution of India. The Act, which mandated a 75% job reservation for local candidates in the private sector, faced severe legal scrutiny and was ultimately deemed to be in violation of Articles 14, 16, and 19 of the Constitution.

Justice G.S. Sandhawalia and Justice Harpreet Kaur Jeewan, in their detailed judgment, observed, "The Act infringes on the constitutional principles of equality, non-discrimination, and freedom of profession," emphasizing the need to uphold the Doctrine of Basic Structure. The court unequivocally stated that the legislation's regionalist approach was detrimental to national unity and integration.

The judgment also highlighted the discriminatory nature of the provisions based on domicile or resident status for employment in the private sector. It underscored the unconstitutional implications of such policies, stating, "Discriminatory provisions based on domicile or resident status for employment in the private sector go against the Constitution."

Addressing the issue of freedom of profession, the court observed that the Act unduly restricted the freedom of private employers, conflicting with Article 19(1)(g). The court's stance was clear: "The restrictions imposed are not reasonable or justifiable under constitutional standards."

In a significant commentary on national integration, the court noted that the Act's approach was contrary to the constitutional mandate of national unity, stating, "The Act's regionalist approach is detrimental to national unity."

This judgment is a significant affirmation of constitutional rights and principles, particularly in the context of employment and non-discrimination. The court's decision to strike down the Act serves as a reminder of the judiciary's role in upholding constitutional morality and the importance of national integration in legislative policies.

The ruling has widespread implications for similar legislations across the country, setting a precedent for the examination of the constitutionality of state employment laws that may potentially infringe on fundamental rights and freedoms. The decision has been welcomed by legal experts and is seen as a reinforcement of the constitutional promise of equality and non-discrimination for all citizens, irrespective of their state of domicile or residence.

Date of Decision: 17 November  2023

IMT Industrial Association and another VS State of Haryana and another

Latest Legal News