Unregistered Agreement Of Sale Entered Before Attachment Cannot Defeat Decree-Holder’s Claim: Andhra Pradesh High Court No Presumption That Joint Family Possesses Joint Property; Female Hindu Absolute Owner Of Property Purchased In Her Name: Allahabad High Court Age Determination Must Strictly Follow Hierarchy Of Documents Under JJ Act: Orissa High Court Acquits Man Of POCSO Charges Once 'C' Form Declarations Are Signed, Burden Shifts To Buyer To Prove Payment Of Outstanding Dues: Madras High Court Section 213 Succession Act No Bar To Eviction Suit If Claim Is Based On Landlord-Tenant Relationship, Not Title Under Will: Bombay High Court Meritorious Candidate Wrongfully Denied Appointment Entitled To Notional Seniority & Old Pension Scheme: J&K & Ladakh High Court 6-Year Delay In Propounding Will & Hostile Attesting Witness Constitute 'Grave Suspicious Circumstances': Delhi High Court Refuses Probate Section 319 CrPC Power Cannot Be Exercised Based On FIR Or Section 161 Statements: Allahabad High Court Quashes Summoning Of Unmarried Sisters Bail Proceedings Cannot Be Converted Into Recovery Proceedings; Court Can't Order Sale Of Accused's Property: Supreme Court Able-Bodied Husband Cannot Defeat Maintenance Claim By Projecting Income Below Minimum Wages: Delhi High Court Recording Section 313 CrPC Statement Before Cross-Examination Of Prosecution Witness Does Not Vitiate Trial: Karnataka High Court Murder By Unknown Assailants Is Not 'Accidental Death' Under Mukhymantri Kisan Bima Yojna: Allahabad High Court Section 311 CrPC | Court Not A Passive Bystander, Must Summon Material Witness If Essential For Just Decision: Rajasthan High Court

GST Theft Bail Granted: RJ HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The bench of Justice Narendra Singh Dhaddha of the Rajasthan High Court has granted bail to the individual accused of evading 8.64 crore rupees in GST.

The petitioner has filed a request for bail. The petitioner has been charged with violating Section 132 (1) of the 2017 Central Goods and Services Tax Act.

The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated in the incident. He has been incarcerated since 26 May 2002. The petitioner's offence is redressable, and he had already paid Rs. 87 lakhs in compensation. The maximum sentence is five years, and the trial may take a long time to conclude.

The department claimed that the petitioner evaded 8.64 crores in GST. The recorded statements under Section 70 of the GST Act are admissible as evidence. The petitioner is a repeat offender; therefore, bail should be denied.

The court ordered the petitioner's release on bail if he posts a personal bond in the amount of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties in the amount of Rs. 25,000 each.

D.D:01-07-2022

Kamal Chand Bothra Versus Union Of India

Latest Legal News