MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

GST Theft Bail Granted: RJ HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The bench of Justice Narendra Singh Dhaddha of the Rajasthan High Court has granted bail to the individual accused of evading 8.64 crore rupees in GST.

The petitioner has filed a request for bail. The petitioner has been charged with violating Section 132 (1) of the 2017 Central Goods and Services Tax Act.

The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated in the incident. He has been incarcerated since 26 May 2002. The petitioner's offence is redressable, and he had already paid Rs. 87 lakhs in compensation. The maximum sentence is five years, and the trial may take a long time to conclude.

The department claimed that the petitioner evaded 8.64 crores in GST. The recorded statements under Section 70 of the GST Act are admissible as evidence. The petitioner is a repeat offender; therefore, bail should be denied.

The court ordered the petitioner's release on bail if he posts a personal bond in the amount of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties in the amount of Rs. 25,000 each.

D.D:01-07-2022

Kamal Chand Bothra Versus Union Of India

Latest Legal News