Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs

Goods Cannot be Deemed Obscene Based on Imaginative or Potential Misuse - Caresmith Wave Body Massagers Not Adult Sex Toys: Bombay High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Bombay High Court in a landmark judgment addressed the interpretation of ‘obscene’ under customs law and its applicability to imported goods. The court emphasized that the classification of imported items as ‘obscene’, particularly in the context of ‘Caresmith Wave Body Massagers’, should not rely on subjective perceptions or imaginative potential uses.

The issue revolved around the import of “Caresmith Wave Body Massagers,” which the Commissioner of Customs, NS-V classified as prohibited ‘Adult Sex Toys’ under Customs Notification No. 01/1964-Customs. This decision was based on the Commissioner’s perception that these massagers could potentially be used as sex toys. The case raised questions about the application of obscenity definitions under the Customs Act and the Indian Penal Code.

Objective Standards vs. Subjective Perceptions: The Court critiqued the subjective approach taken by the Commissioner. Justice G.S. Kulkarni noted, “Firstly, it was clearly the figment of the Commissioner’s imagination and/or his personal perception that the goods are prohibited items.”

Interpretation of Obscenity under Customs Law: The Court highlighted the need for an objective interpretation. “Any perverse application of law would fall foul of the rules of legitimacy and fairness expected from a quasi-judicial authority,” the Court observed.

Applicability of Customs Notification and IPC: The Court found that the Commissioner’s interpretation, influenced by personal views and not legal standards, failed to appropriately apply the customs notification and IPC provisions.

Decision: The High Court overturned the decision of the Commissioner of Customs, allowing the import of ‘Caresmith Wave Body Massagers’ and ruling them not to be ‘obscene articles’ under the relevant customs and penal provisions. The Court directed customs authorities to adhere to legal definitions and objective standards in determining the obscenity of imported goods.

Date of Decision: 20 March 2024.

Commissioner of Customs NS-V vs. Doc Brown Industries LLP,

Latest Legal News