Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

“Further Incarceration Not Required”: Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Regular Bail to Accused in Alleged Anti-National Activities Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant order , the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Sumit Kumar, who was accused of anti-national activities and possession of weapons. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi presided over the case and laid out the judgement.

The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, was accused under various sections of the IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act. He was in custody since July 28, 2022, and was seeking bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C).

The Court observed, “The veracity of the prosecution case against the petitioner shall be adjudicated upon during the course of the trial.” The judgement further noted that “Admittedly, the petitioner is in custody since 28.07.2022 and none of the 14 prosecution witnesses have been examined so far.” Justice Bedi concluded that “the further incarceration of the petitioner is not required,” which set the tone for the final decision.

While the defense argued that there was no concrete evidence against Sumit Kumar, the State contended that he was part of a larger gang involved in anti-national activities. Nonetheless, the Court granted regular bail to the petitioner subject to terms and conditions. One of these conditions requires Kumar to appear before the police station on the first Monday of every month until the trial concludes.

The Court also imposed financial conditions, instructing Kumar to prepare an FDR of Rs. 1,00,000, to be deposited with the Trial Court. The petitioner was further instructed to deposit his passport with the Trial Court immediately if he had not already done so.

The judgement has not referred to any previous cases, and it explicitly states that the granting of bail does not comment on the merits of the case. The petition stands disposed of, with the petitioner granted bail under the specified conditions.

No other cases were referred to in the judgement, and the petition has been disposed of with the grant of bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions.

Date of Decision: September 01, 2023

Sumit Kumar vs State of Punjab

Latest Legal News