Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Fresh Review of Termination Decision by Indian Oil Corporation Limited in LPG Distributorship: P&H HC

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has ordered a fresh review of the termination decision taken by Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) in a case involving the termination of LPG Distributorship. The judgment was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal on 19th July 2023.

The petitioner, Suman Sheoran Alias Suman Chahal, had approached the High Court seeking the setting aside of the termination order dated 30th June 2022 (Annexure P-5) by IOCL, which resulted in the termination of her LPG Distributorship.

The case revolved around allegations raised against the petitioner, including claims of her involvement in an “agreement to sell” with her mother-in-law and unauthorized foreign visits, among others. The petitioner vehemently denied these allegations, stating that the alleged documents were forged and that she had never entered into any agreement to sell. She also provided evidence that her foreign visits were authorized and that she had delivered motivational lectures without remuneration.

During the hearing, Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner, argued that the impugned order lacked specific findings on the allegations and failed to examine the evidence properly. On the other hand, Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for the respondents-corporation, defended the termination decision, stating that it was made within the terms of the contract, which allowed termination with 30 days’ notice.

After hearing the arguments from both sides, the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal issued the verdict. The court directed IOCL to pass a fresh order within two months, allowing the petitioner an opportunity of hearing and considering all documents on record. The corporation was instructed to address all the issues raised in the show cause notice and the petitioner’s reply before making a final decision on the termination.

The judgment further clarified that the court’s observations should not be seen as expressing an opinion on the merits of the case. The respondent-authority was advised to proceed with the new review in accordance with the law, without being influenced by the court’s observations.

This ruling marks a significant development in the case, giving the petitioner another chance to present her case and defend her LPG Distributorship. The fresh review is expected to bring clarity to the matter and ensure a fair and just decision in accordance with the law.

 Date of Decision: 19th July 2023

Suman Sheoran Alias Suman Chahal  vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited and Others 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Suman_Sheoran_Alias_Suman_Chahal_vs_Indian_Oil_Corporation_Limited_on_19_July_2023_P^0H.pdf"]

Latest Legal News