Gratuity Is a Property Right, Not a Charity: MP High Court Upholds Gratuity Claims of Long-Term Contract Workers Seized Vehicles Must Not Be Left to Rot in Open Yards: Madras High Court Invokes Article 21, Orders Release of Vehicle Seized in Illegal Quarrying Case Even After Talaq And A Settlement, A Divorced Muslim Woman Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CRPC: Kerala High Court Bail Cannot Be Withheld as Punishment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail to Govt Official in ₹200 Cr. Scholarship Scam Citing Delay and Article 21 Violation Custodial Interrogation Necessary in Serious Economic Offences: Delhi High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail in ₹1.91 Cr Housing Scam Specific Relief Act | Readiness and Willingness Must Be Real and Continuous — Plaintiffs Cannot Withhold Funds and Blame the Seller: Bombay High Court Even If Claim Is Styled Under Section 163A, It Can Be Treated Under Section 166 If Negligence Is Pleaded And Higher Compensation Is Claimed: Supreme Court When Cheating Flows from One Criminal Conspiracy, the Law Does Not Demand 1852 FIRs: Supreme Court Upholds Single FIR in Multi-Crore Cheating Case Initiating Multiple FIRs on Same Facts is Impermissible: Supreme Court Quashes Parallel FIRs and Grants Bail Protection in Refund Case Not Every Middleman Is a Trafficker: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail in International Cyber Trafficking Case, Cites Absence of Mens Rea Stay in One Corner Freezes the Whole Map: Madras High Court Upholds Validity of Decades-Old Land Acquisition Despite 11-Year Delay in Award Parole Once Granted Cannot Be Made Illusory by Imposing Impossible Conditions: Rajasthan High Court Declares Mechanical Surety Requirement for Indigent Convicts Unconstitutional Once Acquisition Is Complete, Title Disputes Fall Outside Civil Court Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Appeal Lies Against Lok Adalat Compromise Decree Even on Grounds of Fraud: Orissa High Court Declares First Appeal Not Maintainable Sanction to Prosecute Under UAPA Cannot Be a Mechanical Act: Supreme Court Quashes Jharkhand Government’s Third-Time Sanction Without New Evidence FIRs in Corruption Cases Cannot Be Quashed on Hyper-Technical Grounds of Police Station Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Restores ACB Investigations Quashed by Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Completion of Ayurvedic Nursing Training Does Not Confer Right to Appointment: Supreme Court Rejects Legitimate Expectation Claim by Trainees University’s Error Can’t Cost a Student Her Future: Supreme Court Directs Manav Bharti University to Issue Withheld Degree and Marksheets Due to Clerical Mistake Disciplinary Exoneration Cannot Shield Public Servant from Criminal Trial in Corruption Cases: Supreme Court Customs Tariff Act | ‘End Use’ and ‘Common Parlance’ Tests Cannot Override Statutory Context: Supreme Court Classifies Mushroom Shelves as ‘Aluminium Structures’ Supreme Court Allows PIL Against Limited Maternity Benefits for Adoptive Mothers to Continue Under New Social Security Code Liberty Cannot Wait for Endless Trials: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Wadhawan Brothers in ₹57,000 Crore DHFL Scam Co-Sharer Has Superior Right of Pre-emption Even If Land Is Gair Mumkin Bara: Punjab & Haryana High Court Neighbours Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC Merely For Alleged Instigation: Karnataka High Court No Party Has a Right to Demand a Local Commissioner — It's Purely the Court’s Discretion: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Civil Revision

Fresh Review of Termination Decision by Indian Oil Corporation Limited in LPG Distributorship: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has ordered a fresh review of the termination decision taken by Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) in a case involving the termination of LPG Distributorship. The judgment was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal on 19th July 2023.

The petitioner, Suman Sheoran Alias Suman Chahal, had approached the High Court seeking the setting aside of the termination order dated 30th June 2022 (Annexure P-5) by IOCL, which resulted in the termination of her LPG Distributorship.

The case revolved around allegations raised against the petitioner, including claims of her involvement in an “agreement to sell” with her mother-in-law and unauthorized foreign visits, among others. The petitioner vehemently denied these allegations, stating that the alleged documents were forged and that she had never entered into any agreement to sell. She also provided evidence that her foreign visits were authorized and that she had delivered motivational lectures without remuneration.

During the hearing, Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner, argued that the impugned order lacked specific findings on the allegations and failed to examine the evidence properly. On the other hand, Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for the respondents-corporation, defended the termination decision, stating that it was made within the terms of the contract, which allowed termination with 30 days’ notice.

After hearing the arguments from both sides, the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal issued the verdict. The court directed IOCL to pass a fresh order within two months, allowing the petitioner an opportunity of hearing and considering all documents on record. The corporation was instructed to address all the issues raised in the show cause notice and the petitioner’s reply before making a final decision on the termination.

The judgment further clarified that the court’s observations should not be seen as expressing an opinion on the merits of the case. The respondent-authority was advised to proceed with the new review in accordance with the law, without being influenced by the court’s observations.

This ruling marks a significant development in the case, giving the petitioner another chance to present her case and defend her LPG Distributorship. The fresh review is expected to bring clarity to the matter and ensure a fair and just decision in accordance with the law.

 Date of Decision: 19th July 2023

Suman Sheoran Alias Suman Chahal  vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited and Others 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Suman_Sheoran_Alias_Suman_Chahal_vs_Indian_Oil_Corporation_Limited_on_19_July_2023_P^0H.pdf"]

Latest Legal News