Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

Fresh Review of Termination Decision by Indian Oil Corporation Limited in LPG Distributorship: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has ordered a fresh review of the termination decision taken by Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) in a case involving the termination of LPG Distributorship. The judgment was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal on 19th July 2023.

The petitioner, Suman Sheoran Alias Suman Chahal, had approached the High Court seeking the setting aside of the termination order dated 30th June 2022 (Annexure P-5) by IOCL, which resulted in the termination of her LPG Distributorship.

The case revolved around allegations raised against the petitioner, including claims of her involvement in an “agreement to sell” with her mother-in-law and unauthorized foreign visits, among others. The petitioner vehemently denied these allegations, stating that the alleged documents were forged and that she had never entered into any agreement to sell. She also provided evidence that her foreign visits were authorized and that she had delivered motivational lectures without remuneration.

During the hearing, Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner, argued that the impugned order lacked specific findings on the allegations and failed to examine the evidence properly. On the other hand, Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for the respondents-corporation, defended the termination decision, stating that it was made within the terms of the contract, which allowed termination with 30 days’ notice.

After hearing the arguments from both sides, the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal issued the verdict. The court directed IOCL to pass a fresh order within two months, allowing the petitioner an opportunity of hearing and considering all documents on record. The corporation was instructed to address all the issues raised in the show cause notice and the petitioner’s reply before making a final decision on the termination.

The judgment further clarified that the court’s observations should not be seen as expressing an opinion on the merits of the case. The respondent-authority was advised to proceed with the new review in accordance with the law, without being influenced by the court’s observations.

This ruling marks a significant development in the case, giving the petitioner another chance to present her case and defend her LPG Distributorship. The fresh review is expected to bring clarity to the matter and ensure a fair and just decision in accordance with the law.

 Date of Decision: 19th July 2023

Suman Sheoran Alias Suman Chahal  vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited and Others 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Suman_Sheoran_Alias_Suman_Chahal_vs_Indian_Oil_Corporation_Limited_on_19_July_2023_P^0H.pdf"]

Similar News