Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Fresh Review of Termination Decision by Indian Oil Corporation Limited in LPG Distributorship: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has ordered a fresh review of the termination decision taken by Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) in a case involving the termination of LPG Distributorship. The judgment was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal on 19th July 2023.

The petitioner, Suman Sheoran Alias Suman Chahal, had approached the High Court seeking the setting aside of the termination order dated 30th June 2022 (Annexure P-5) by IOCL, which resulted in the termination of her LPG Distributorship.

The case revolved around allegations raised against the petitioner, including claims of her involvement in an “agreement to sell” with her mother-in-law and unauthorized foreign visits, among others. The petitioner vehemently denied these allegations, stating that the alleged documents were forged and that she had never entered into any agreement to sell. She also provided evidence that her foreign visits were authorized and that she had delivered motivational lectures without remuneration.

During the hearing, Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner, argued that the impugned order lacked specific findings on the allegations and failed to examine the evidence properly. On the other hand, Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for the respondents-corporation, defended the termination decision, stating that it was made within the terms of the contract, which allowed termination with 30 days’ notice.

After hearing the arguments from both sides, the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal issued the verdict. The court directed IOCL to pass a fresh order within two months, allowing the petitioner an opportunity of hearing and considering all documents on record. The corporation was instructed to address all the issues raised in the show cause notice and the petitioner’s reply before making a final decision on the termination.

The judgment further clarified that the court’s observations should not be seen as expressing an opinion on the merits of the case. The respondent-authority was advised to proceed with the new review in accordance with the law, without being influenced by the court’s observations.

This ruling marks a significant development in the case, giving the petitioner another chance to present her case and defend her LPG Distributorship. The fresh review is expected to bring clarity to the matter and ensure a fair and just decision in accordance with the law.

 Date of Decision: 19th July 2023

Suman Sheoran Alias Suman Chahal  vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited and Others 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Suman_Sheoran_Alias_Suman_Chahal_vs_Indian_Oil_Corporation_Limited_on_19_July_2023_P^0H.pdf"]

Latest Legal News