Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

"Flawed Investigation and Lack of Evidence" Lead to Acquittal of Accused in Shihab Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the court of Judges P.B. SURESH KUMAR and C.S. SUDHA on 11th August 2023 acquitted accused 1 to 7 in the murder case of Shihab, citing "flawed investigation and lack of evidence."

The accused were charged with the murder of Shihab, allegedly committed using specific vehicles. The prosecution had built its case on the testimony of two witnesses and the seizure of the vehicles. However, the court found that there was "no satisfactory evidence connecting MO11 and MO13 to the crime or the accused to the vehicles" (Para 27).

The judgment highlighted serious lapses in the investigation, including inconsistencies in the police diary and a delay in questioning key witnesses. The court observed, "The facts aforesaid revealed from the police diary, according to us, would show either that this is a case where the investigating officer has arrayed the accused in the case as the assailants of Shihab for extraneous reasons or solely for the reason that they are active members of the organization, RSS without conducting proper investigation" (Para 30).

The court's decision to acquit the accused was not based on a finding of innocence but rather on the flawed investigation. The judgment expressed concern over the impact of such flawed investigations on the credibility of the justice system, stating, "We are conscious of the fact that acquittal of the accused in a case of this nature would seriously affect the credibility of the justice delivery system, but we are constrained to do so, as we have real doubt as to whether it is accused 1 to 7 who have committed the crime, though we do not have any doubt to the fact that the crime has been committed by a group of persons in the manner alleged" (Para 34).

The court's decision has brought attention to the importance of proper investigation and the potential consequences of faulty investigation on both the accused and the justice system as a whole. The ruling emphasizes the need for deeper investigation and careful consideration of evidence to ensure that justice is served.

Date of Decision: 11.08.2023

NAVEEN vs STATE OF KERALA

Latest Legal News