Promotees Allowed to Challenge Provisional Seniority List in Dispute Between Direct Recruitment and Promotion: Kerala High Court Frivolous Defenses Cannot Justify Leave to Defend Under Order XXXVII CPC Delhi High Court Candidates Merely Enrolled in Final Year B.V.Sc. Program Ineligible for Veterinary Officer Recruitment: Rajasthan High Court Manufacturing or Sale of Garments Does Not Attract Copyright Protection; Procedural Violations Under Trade Marks Act Renders Prosecution Unsustainable: P&H High Court Ownership Alone Is Not Sufficient to Maintain Eviction Suit; Plaintiff Must Qualify as a Lessor Under Lease Agreement: Calcutta High Court Findings Based on Evidence Cannot Be Interfered With in a Second Appeal Without Substantial Question of Law: AP High Court Chain of Circumstances Broken: Inferences Cannot Replace Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Kerala High Court Bail | Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 of the Constitution: Bombay High Court Encroachment on a Common Lane Gives Rise to Recurring Cause of Action: Madras High Court Holds Limitation Act Inapplicable to Pathway Disputes Reproductive Autonomy Includes the Right to Abort Without Spousal Consent: P&H High Court Access to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 is Not an Absolute Bar Against MSEFC Awards: Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on Writ Jurisdiction to Larger Bench Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted for Title and Mortgage Disputes Under SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court Principle of Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Supreme Court Panchayat Law | Mandatory Compliance With Section 34 And Rule 3 Is Non-Negotiable In Resignation Cases: Bombay High Court Quashes Resignation Of Upa-Sarpanch Recovery of Bullet Fired from Accused’s Weapon Crucial: PH High Court Reaffirms Conviction in Murder Case Injured Witness Evidence Carries Built-in Reliability Unless Contradicted Significantly: Kerala High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Murder Case Civil Dispute with Criminal Elements Cannot Be Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Karnataka High Court Issuance of Summons Under Section 91 CrPC During Preliminary Verification is Without Jurisdiction: High Court of J&K and Ladakh Article 21 Prevails Over NDPS Act’s Section 37 Restrictions in Cases of Prolonged Incarceration: Delhi High Court Once a Property is Waqf, It Remains Waqf Perpetually: Calcutta High Court Affirms No Secular Ownership Can Derive from Waqf Properties Surveillance Without Opportunity to Object Violates Articles 14, 19, and 21: Allahabad High Court Quashes Class-B History Sheets Mandatory Provisions of Order XXI CPC Were Violated, Rendering the Auction Sale Illegal: Punjab and Haryana High Court

"Flawed Investigation and Lack of Evidence" Lead to Acquittal of Accused in Shihab Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the court of Judges P.B. SURESH KUMAR and C.S. SUDHA on 11th August 2023 acquitted accused 1 to 7 in the murder case of Shihab, citing "flawed investigation and lack of evidence."

The accused were charged with the murder of Shihab, allegedly committed using specific vehicles. The prosecution had built its case on the testimony of two witnesses and the seizure of the vehicles. However, the court found that there was "no satisfactory evidence connecting MO11 and MO13 to the crime or the accused to the vehicles" (Para 27).

The judgment highlighted serious lapses in the investigation, including inconsistencies in the police diary and a delay in questioning key witnesses. The court observed, "The facts aforesaid revealed from the police diary, according to us, would show either that this is a case where the investigating officer has arrayed the accused in the case as the assailants of Shihab for extraneous reasons or solely for the reason that they are active members of the organization, RSS without conducting proper investigation" (Para 30).

The court's decision to acquit the accused was not based on a finding of innocence but rather on the flawed investigation. The judgment expressed concern over the impact of such flawed investigations on the credibility of the justice system, stating, "We are conscious of the fact that acquittal of the accused in a case of this nature would seriously affect the credibility of the justice delivery system, but we are constrained to do so, as we have real doubt as to whether it is accused 1 to 7 who have committed the crime, though we do not have any doubt to the fact that the crime has been committed by a group of persons in the manner alleged" (Para 34).

The court's decision has brought attention to the importance of proper investigation and the potential consequences of faulty investigation on both the accused and the justice system as a whole. The ruling emphasizes the need for deeper investigation and careful consideration of evidence to ensure that justice is served.

Date of Decision: 11.08.2023

NAVEEN vs STATE OF KERALA

Similar News