Mere Entry, Abuse Or Assault Is Not Civil Contempt – Willfulness And Dispossession Must Be Clearly Proved: Bombay High Court Magistrate Cannot Shut Eyes To Final Report After Cognizance – Supplementary Report Must Be Judicially Considered Before Framing Charges: Allahabad High Court Examination-in-Chief Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction Amid Serious Doubts: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Cannot Reclaim Absolute Ownership After Letting Your Declaration Suit Fail: AP High Court Enforces Finality in Partition Appeal Death Due to Fat Embolism and Delayed Treatment Is Not Culpable Homicide: Orissa High Court Converts 30-Year-Old 304 Part-I Conviction to Grievous Hurt Fabricated Lease Cannot Be Sanctified by Consolidation Entry: Orissa High Court Dismisses 36-Year-Old Second Appeal Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization

"Flawed Investigation and Lack of Evidence" Lead to Acquittal of Accused in Shihab Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the court of Judges P.B. SURESH KUMAR and C.S. SUDHA on 11th August 2023 acquitted accused 1 to 7 in the murder case of Shihab, citing "flawed investigation and lack of evidence."

The accused were charged with the murder of Shihab, allegedly committed using specific vehicles. The prosecution had built its case on the testimony of two witnesses and the seizure of the vehicles. However, the court found that there was "no satisfactory evidence connecting MO11 and MO13 to the crime or the accused to the vehicles" (Para 27).

The judgment highlighted serious lapses in the investigation, including inconsistencies in the police diary and a delay in questioning key witnesses. The court observed, "The facts aforesaid revealed from the police diary, according to us, would show either that this is a case where the investigating officer has arrayed the accused in the case as the assailants of Shihab for extraneous reasons or solely for the reason that they are active members of the organization, RSS without conducting proper investigation" (Para 30).

The court's decision to acquit the accused was not based on a finding of innocence but rather on the flawed investigation. The judgment expressed concern over the impact of such flawed investigations on the credibility of the justice system, stating, "We are conscious of the fact that acquittal of the accused in a case of this nature would seriously affect the credibility of the justice delivery system, but we are constrained to do so, as we have real doubt as to whether it is accused 1 to 7 who have committed the crime, though we do not have any doubt to the fact that the crime has been committed by a group of persons in the manner alleged" (Para 34).

The court's decision has brought attention to the importance of proper investigation and the potential consequences of faulty investigation on both the accused and the justice system as a whole. The ruling emphasizes the need for deeper investigation and careful consideration of evidence to ensure that justice is served.

Date of Decision: 11.08.2023

NAVEEN vs STATE OF KERALA

Latest Legal News