Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Collector’s Appointment of Ex-Serviceman as Lambardar: Preference for Service to the State Valid Tax to Be Computed at 100% Under DTVSV Act, Rejects Inclusion of Belated Grounds in Disputed Tax: Bombay High Court Petitioner’s Father Did Not Fall Within Definition of Enemy – Kerala High Court Quashes Land Classification Under Enemy Property Act Calcutta High Court Upholds Cancellation of LPG Distributor LOI for Violating Guidelines Recording 'Reasons to Believe' is a Mandatory Safeguard, Not a Mere Formality Under PMLA: P&H High Court Illegality Is Incurable, Unauthorized Constructions Cannot Be Regularized: Bombay High Court Kerala High Court Quashes Tribunal’s Order Granting Retrospective UGC Benefits to Librarians Without Required Qualifications Order XLI Rule 27 CPC | No Evidence Can Be Admitted Beyond Pleadings, And Additional Evidence Cannot Be Allowed Merely To Fill Lacunae: Jharkhand High Court Quashing | Mere Heated Exchanges Over Loan Repayment Do Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide: Supreme Court Prisoner Transfers Must Prioritize Security and Prevent Gang Violence: Supreme Court Restores Intra-State Transfer Order Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC Is Conditional Upon Framing Substantial Questions of Law: Supreme Court Panchayat Election | Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Bar on Judicial Review During Election Process Encroachment Allegation Requires Concrete Evidence, Not Mere Surmises: Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea for Disqualification of Sarpanch Order Denying Permission for Peaceful Protest Rally Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Prolonged Custody Alone Cannot Justify Bail In Cases Involving Heinous Crimes: Delhi High Court Body Shaming and Sexually Colored Remarks Are Unacceptable In A Civilized Society: Kerala High Court No Mandatory Injunction Where Failure to Prove Ownership and Possession: Punjab and Haryana High Court Supreme Court Dismisses Article 32 Petition Seeking Declaration of Bombay High Court Judgment as Illegal Specific Relief Act | Power to Extend Time Under Section 28 Is Discretionary and Must Be Exercised Prudently: Supreme Court

First Wife’s Right to Challenge Second Marriage under Hindu Marriage Act: ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

06 September 2024 5:29 AM

By: Admin


In a significant and precedent-setting ruling, the Hon’ble High Court delivered a judgment upholding the rights of the first wife to challenge the legality of a second marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The bench comprising of Vinod Diwakar, J., and S.D. Singh, J., emphasized the need for a pragmatic and harmonious approach to interpreting social welfare legislation while safeguarding the rights of individuals involved in marital disputes.

Quoting from the judgment, the Court stated, “The legislature’s intention is to be gathered from the words they employ. The Court should give restrictive meaning only to the words used in the statutes to avoid absurd results and hardships. However, the rule of strict construction says that while interpreting even penal statutes, the judge should adopt that meaning which confers the benefit of the doubt to the accused.”

The case centered around the interpretation of the phrase “either party thereto” used in Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court held that the phrase should be understood in harmony with “against the other party” to provide a clear and purposeful understanding of the section’s scope. This interpretation allowed the first wife, the respondent in this case, the right to file an application seeking the declaration of the second marriage as illegal and void.

In its judgment, the Court further stressed, “If the first wife is deprived of seeking a remedy under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, it would defeat the very purpose and intent of the Act. The protection offered to legally wedded wives under sections 5, 11, and 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act would become insignificant in such a scenario.”

The Family Courts Act, 1984, which aimed to streamline the resolution of family disputes, played a pivotal role in the Court’s ruling. The Act focused on simplification, expeditious resolution, promotion of conciliation, protection of women’s rights, the welfare of children, accessibility, affordability, and quick disposal of cases related to marriage, divorce, custody, guardianship, maintenance, and other familial issues.

Date of Decision: 27th July 2023

Garima Singh vs Pratima Singh And Another

Similar News