Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

First Wife’s Right to Challenge Second Marriage under Hindu Marriage Act: ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

06 September 2024 5:29 AM

By: Admin


In a significant and precedent-setting ruling, the Hon’ble High Court delivered a judgment upholding the rights of the first wife to challenge the legality of a second marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The bench comprising of Vinod Diwakar, J., and S.D. Singh, J., emphasized the need for a pragmatic and harmonious approach to interpreting social welfare legislation while safeguarding the rights of individuals involved in marital disputes.

Quoting from the judgment, the Court stated, “The legislature’s intention is to be gathered from the words they employ. The Court should give restrictive meaning only to the words used in the statutes to avoid absurd results and hardships. However, the rule of strict construction says that while interpreting even penal statutes, the judge should adopt that meaning which confers the benefit of the doubt to the accused.”

The case centered around the interpretation of the phrase “either party thereto” used in Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court held that the phrase should be understood in harmony with “against the other party” to provide a clear and purposeful understanding of the section’s scope. This interpretation allowed the first wife, the respondent in this case, the right to file an application seeking the declaration of the second marriage as illegal and void.

In its judgment, the Court further stressed, “If the first wife is deprived of seeking a remedy under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, it would defeat the very purpose and intent of the Act. The protection offered to legally wedded wives under sections 5, 11, and 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act would become insignificant in such a scenario.”

The Family Courts Act, 1984, which aimed to streamline the resolution of family disputes, played a pivotal role in the Court’s ruling. The Act focused on simplification, expeditious resolution, promotion of conciliation, protection of women’s rights, the welfare of children, accessibility, affordability, and quick disposal of cases related to marriage, divorce, custody, guardianship, maintenance, and other familial issues.

Date of Decision: 27th July 2023

Garima Singh vs Pratima Singh And Another

Latest Legal News