Benefit Of Acquittal Can Be Extended To Non-Appealing Co-Accused If Prosecution Case Is Found To Be Fundamentally Unreliable: Madras High Court Hindu Marriage Act | Petition For Restitution Of Conjugal Rights Serves As A Valid Defence Against Allegations Of Desertion: Kerala High Court Employee Has No Vested Right To Seek Or Retain Additional Charge; Writ Petition Not Maintainable To Challenge Its Withdrawal: Madhya Pradesh High Court Insurance Act | Insurer Cannot Waive Statutory Deadline For Premium Payment Under Bank Guarantee; No Estoppel Against Statute: NCDRC Absence Of Crime Number In Inquest Report & Discrepancy In Sec 157 CrPC Special Report Renders FIR Doubtful: Allahabad High Court MTP Act  | Termination Of Pregnancy Beyond 24 Weeks Permissible If It Involves Risk To Life Or Grave Injury To Mental Health Of The Victim: Gujarat High Court Section 174A IPC | FIR Cannot Be Quashed If Process Server Reports Indicate Failure To Serve At Ordinary Residence: Delhi High Court Issues Guidelines Insolvency Petition | Transferees Of Debtor Cannot Substitute Debtor To Rebut Allegation Of Intent To Defeat Creditors Under Section 6(b) Provincial Insolvency Act: High Court Medical Negligence | Doctor Cannot Be Held Liable For Choosing One Reasonable Course Of Treatment Over Another: Bombay High Court Cruelty | Non-Registration Of FIR Cannot Be Ground To Discredit Testimony Of Wife Seeking Divorce: Jharkhand High Court No Deception At Inception: Calcutta High Court Refuses To Revive Cheating Charges Against Borrower After One-Time Settlement Consumer Protection Act | Doctrine Of 'Caveat Emptor' Subservient To 'Caveat Venditor'; Auctioneer Liable For Sale Of Encumbered Vehicle: State Commission Section 127 CrPC | Past Compromise Not An Eternal Estoppel To Bar Wife From Seeking Enhancement In Maintenance: Orissa High Court States Can Prescribe Higher Qualifications Than UGC Norms, Additional Tests Promote Meritocracy: Punjab & Haryana High Court Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cancel Registered Sale Deed Or Adjudicate Title Disputes: Telangana High Court Principal Employer Cannot Abdicate Statutory Liability For Overtime Wages Of Contract Labour Despite Contractual Indemnity Clauses: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Preliminary Inquiry Not Mandatory For Invoking SC/ST Act Provisions If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked For Re-valuation Of Structures Once Compensation Dispute Is Adjudicated Under Section 64 RFCTLARR Act: Telangana High Court Revenue Village Naming | Government Must Ensure Names Do Not Reflect Any Person, Caste, Or Religion Under Policy Guidelines: Rajasthan High Court Section 138 NI Act | Complainant Must Prove Proprietorship Of Firm To Establish Status As 'Payee' Or 'Holder In Due Course': Himachal Pradesh High Court

FIR registered against judge and her Husband by CBI

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has charged Rachna Tiwari Lakhanpal and her husband Alok Lakhanpal with amassing excessive assets.

Under the Prevention of Corruption Act, Senior Civil Judge (West) Lakhanpal of the Tis Hazari Courts in New Delhi has been charged with criminal misconduct by a public servant.

According to the first information report, Lakhanpal's husband, an attorney named Alok Lakhanpal, amassed enormous assets between July 2006 and September 2016.

According to the FIR, the two amassed disproportionate assets totaling 2,99 crores during the specified time frame.

Lakhanpal and her husband possessed movable assets totaling 1.09 lakh at the beginning of the relevant period. At the end of the evaluation period, it reached 3.53 million.

According to the FIR, their income during the specified period was 1.05 million, while their expenditures were 51.73 million.

"It is pertinent to note that Ms. Rachna Tiwari Lakhanpal has not informed the department about the 9,40,990 in unaccounted cash that was recovered during the house search, nor has she disclosed the actual value of house no. R-546, New Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, which is 1,605,000. Even Alok Lakhanpal participated actively in the acquisition of numerous assets in his own name and in the names of his relatives. Thus, he is also liable for abetting the crime under section 109 of the Indian Penal Code, and Rachna Tiwari Lakhanpal, Senior Civil Judge (under suspension) is liable for the crime of acquiring disproportionate assets under sections 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the PC Act 1988 "It's been stated.

In 2016, Tiwari was caught accepting bribes, leading to her and her husband's arrest.

She subsequently obtained bail in that case.

Latest Legal News