Law Does Not Countenance Resurrection Of Stale Claims Through Inventive Drafting: Karnataka High Court Rejects 20-Year-Old Partition Dispute CPC Provisions Cannot Be Used to Transfer Consumer Complaints Across States: NCDRC Invokes Section 62 to End Forum-Shifting Ordeal in Nirmal Spinning Mills Case FSSA Provisions Prevail Over PFA Act In Cases Of Overlapping Jurisdiction, Prosecution Under Old Act Impermissible: J&K High Court Motive Pales Into Significance When Direct Ocular Evidence Establishes Crime; Enmity Is A Double-Edged Sword: Allahabad High Court Plaintiff Cannot Succeed Merely On Weakness Of Defence; Initial Burden To Prove Claim Rests On Claimant: Madras High Court Witness Threats Noted By Higher Courts Disentitle Convict To Suspension Of Sentence: Gujarat High Court Family Court Orders Must Be Enforced Immediately, Pendency Of Applications No Excuse For Disobedience: Delhi High Court 'Fraud And Justice Never Dwell Together': Karnataka High Court Reverses Order To Grant Land Based On Fabricated Records Development Authority Competent To Sanction Land Use Conversion From Residential To Nursing Home If Permitted Under Master Plan & Zoning Regulations: Allahabad High Court Notification Changing Import Policy From 'Free' To 'Restricted' Operative Only From Exact Time Of Publication In E-Gazette: Delhi High Court On Name Of Protection of the Complainer Excluding Relevant Defence Evidence in Sexual Offences Trials May Breach Fair Trial Rights: UK Supreme Court Boundaries In Sale Deed Prevail Over Discrepancy In Property Description; Adverse Possession Begins From Date Of Hostile Notice: Punjab & Haryana HC Supreme Court of UK Upholds HMRC Decision: Professional Fees Incurred by Investment Holding Company Are Capital Expenditure Criminal Law Cannot Be Used To Silence Citizens Questioning Legality Of Police Action: Madras High Court Quashes Obstruction Case Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs Centre To Treat Ashok Khemka As Empaneled For Future Assignments, Says Denying Relaxation Granted To Peers Is Discriminatory Section 34 Court Cannot Substitute Arbitrator’s Plausible View With Its Own; Not Bound By Technical Rules Of Evidence Act: Madras High Court Article 227 Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Reopen Decrees Finalized Four Decades Ago: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Challenge To 1985 Order Daughter Has No Right To Inherit Agricultural Land If Succession Opened Before 2005 HSA Amendment: Delhi High Court Rejects Plaint Indian Trust Act Inapplicable To Public Religious Endowments; Sale Of Charity Property Without HR&CE Commissioner's Permission Void: Madras High Court Supreme Court Clarifies Status of Collateral Warranties Under Construction Contracts FIR Quashed Against Newsclick: PMLA Proceedings Cannot Stand Alone Without A Predicate Offence, Rules Delhi High Court Assessee Claiming TDS Exemption On "Reimbursement" To Non-Residents Must Obtain Mandatory Tax Determination Under Section 195(2): Madras High Court

FIR registered against judge and her Husband by CBI

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has charged Rachna Tiwari Lakhanpal and her husband Alok Lakhanpal with amassing excessive assets.

Under the Prevention of Corruption Act, Senior Civil Judge (West) Lakhanpal of the Tis Hazari Courts in New Delhi has been charged with criminal misconduct by a public servant.

According to the first information report, Lakhanpal's husband, an attorney named Alok Lakhanpal, amassed enormous assets between July 2006 and September 2016.

According to the FIR, the two amassed disproportionate assets totaling 2,99 crores during the specified time frame.

Lakhanpal and her husband possessed movable assets totaling 1.09 lakh at the beginning of the relevant period. At the end of the evaluation period, it reached 3.53 million.

According to the FIR, their income during the specified period was 1.05 million, while their expenditures were 51.73 million.

"It is pertinent to note that Ms. Rachna Tiwari Lakhanpal has not informed the department about the 9,40,990 in unaccounted cash that was recovered during the house search, nor has she disclosed the actual value of house no. R-546, New Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, which is 1,605,000. Even Alok Lakhanpal participated actively in the acquisition of numerous assets in his own name and in the names of his relatives. Thus, he is also liable for abetting the crime under section 109 of the Indian Penal Code, and Rachna Tiwari Lakhanpal, Senior Civil Judge (under suspension) is liable for the crime of acquiring disproportionate assets under sections 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the PC Act 1988 "It's been stated.

In 2016, Tiwari was caught accepting bribes, leading to her and her husband's arrest.

She subsequently obtained bail in that case.

Latest Legal News