MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

FIR registered against judge and her Husband by CBI

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has charged Rachna Tiwari Lakhanpal and her husband Alok Lakhanpal with amassing excessive assets.

Under the Prevention of Corruption Act, Senior Civil Judge (West) Lakhanpal of the Tis Hazari Courts in New Delhi has been charged with criminal misconduct by a public servant.

According to the first information report, Lakhanpal's husband, an attorney named Alok Lakhanpal, amassed enormous assets between July 2006 and September 2016.

According to the FIR, the two amassed disproportionate assets totaling 2,99 crores during the specified time frame.

Lakhanpal and her husband possessed movable assets totaling 1.09 lakh at the beginning of the relevant period. At the end of the evaluation period, it reached 3.53 million.

According to the FIR, their income during the specified period was 1.05 million, while their expenditures were 51.73 million.

"It is pertinent to note that Ms. Rachna Tiwari Lakhanpal has not informed the department about the 9,40,990 in unaccounted cash that was recovered during the house search, nor has she disclosed the actual value of house no. R-546, New Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, which is 1,605,000. Even Alok Lakhanpal participated actively in the acquisition of numerous assets in his own name and in the names of his relatives. Thus, he is also liable for abetting the crime under section 109 of the Indian Penal Code, and Rachna Tiwari Lakhanpal, Senior Civil Judge (under suspension) is liable for the crime of acquiring disproportionate assets under sections 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the PC Act 1988 "It's been stated.

In 2016, Tiwari was caught accepting bribes, leading to her and her husband's arrest.

She subsequently obtained bail in that case.

Latest Legal News