Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

Father Cannot Be Booked for Kidnapping His Own Child: Bombay High Court

05 September 2024 5:56 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark ruling, the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, clarified that a father cannot be accused of kidnapping his own child. The judgment, dated 06th October 2023, quashed an FIR lodged against Shri Ashish Mule, who was accused of kidnapping his 3-year-old son.

Justice Vinay Joshi, in his oral judgment, stated that a father, being the natural guardian, cannot be booked for taking away his own minor child from the custody of the mother. The case revolved around whether a father could be charged with kidnapping for taking his own minor son from the mother’s custody.

The Court observed, “In absence of any prohibition by the order of the competent Court, the applicant father cannot be booked for taking away his own minor child from the custody of his mother.” The judgment referred to Section 361 of the IPC and Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, concluding that the father is a “natural guardian” and a “lawful guardian” along with the mother.

The Court also referred to similar precedents set by the Orissa, Kerala, Karnataka, Punjab and Haryana, and Allahabad High Courts. Justice Joshi remarked, “The effect of natural father taking away the child from custody of the mother in real sense amounts to taking a child from the lawful guardianship of the mother to the another lawful guardianship of the father.”

In light of these observations, the Court held that continuing the prosecution would amount to abuse of the process of the Court. Consequently, the FIR lodged against Shri Ashish Mule for the offense punishable under Section 363 of the IPC was quashed and set aside.

Legal experts believe that this ruling sets a significant precedent and clarifies the legal position on guardianship and custody matters involving parents.

Date of Decision: 6 October 2023

Shri Ash ish VS State of Maharashtra

Latest Legal News