Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal GST Officer Froze Business Accounts Without Any Legal Basis, Ignored Taxpayer for Three Months: Bombay High Court Imposes Personal Costs Weapon Recovered, But No Forensic Report, No Independent Witness — Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused

Family Dispute Not Grounds for Writ Jurisdiction”: High Court Dismisses Retired Air Commodore’s Plea Against MP Brother

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Patna has dismissed a writ application filed by a retired Air Commodore, who alleged misuse of CRPF personnel by his brother, a sitting Member of Parliament, in a family property dispute. Honourable Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha declared, “the petitioner has not been able to make out a case for grant of reliefs, claimed by him, requiring interference by this Court in its extraordinary writ jurisdiction.”

The case centered on the petitioner's claim that he was wrongfully denied access to his ancestral home by CRPF personnel acting under the directions of his brother, respondent no. 7. The petitioner sought the court’s intervention, asserting a violation of his fundamental rights under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution.

In response to the dismissal, the court underscored the existence of alternative civil remedies for property disputes. Justice Sinha noted, “the High Court cannot allow the constitutional jurisdiction to be used for deciding disputes, for which remedies, under the general law, civil or criminal, are available.” The judgment emphasizes that while the High Court’s jurisdiction is wide, it is not an alternative for relief obtainable through a suit or other statutory provisions.

The court further observed that the alleged Interference by CRPF personnel did not constitute a violation of the petitioner’s fundamental rights, stating, “dignity of the petitioner has not been violated/interfered with and/or tarnished either by the CRPF personnel deployed at the residence of respondent no. 7 at Amnour or by respondent no. 7 himself.”

This decision reaffirms the principle that writ jurisdiction is not the appropriate forum for resolving private property disputes that are adequately addressed by civil law procedures. The court’s findings have profound implications for the jurisprudence of property rights and the scope of writ jurisdiction in the context of familial property disputes.

Date of Decision: 03-11-2023

AIR COMMODORE RANDHIR PRATAP VS THE UNION OF INDIA

Latest Legal News