Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Family Dispute Not Grounds for Writ Jurisdiction”: High Court Dismisses Retired Air Commodore’s Plea Against MP Brother

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Patna has dismissed a writ application filed by a retired Air Commodore, who alleged misuse of CRPF personnel by his brother, a sitting Member of Parliament, in a family property dispute. Honourable Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha declared, “the petitioner has not been able to make out a case for grant of reliefs, claimed by him, requiring interference by this Court in its extraordinary writ jurisdiction.”

The case centered on the petitioner's claim that he was wrongfully denied access to his ancestral home by CRPF personnel acting under the directions of his brother, respondent no. 7. The petitioner sought the court’s intervention, asserting a violation of his fundamental rights under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution.

In response to the dismissal, the court underscored the existence of alternative civil remedies for property disputes. Justice Sinha noted, “the High Court cannot allow the constitutional jurisdiction to be used for deciding disputes, for which remedies, under the general law, civil or criminal, are available.” The judgment emphasizes that while the High Court’s jurisdiction is wide, it is not an alternative for relief obtainable through a suit or other statutory provisions.

The court further observed that the alleged Interference by CRPF personnel did not constitute a violation of the petitioner’s fundamental rights, stating, “dignity of the petitioner has not been violated/interfered with and/or tarnished either by the CRPF personnel deployed at the residence of respondent no. 7 at Amnour or by respondent no. 7 himself.”

This decision reaffirms the principle that writ jurisdiction is not the appropriate forum for resolving private property disputes that are adequately addressed by civil law procedures. The court’s findings have profound implications for the jurisprudence of property rights and the scope of writ jurisdiction in the context of familial property disputes.

Date of Decision: 03-11-2023

AIR COMMODORE RANDHIR PRATAP VS THE UNION OF INDIA

Latest Legal News