MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Eyewitness Testimony and Recovered Weapon Tie Accused to Murder: P&H High Court Overturned Acquittal After 22 Years

12 October 2024 7:58 PM

By: sayum


Punjab and Haryana High Court overturned the acquittal of several accused in a 1998 murder case, convicting them based on strong evidence, including an eyewitness account and the recovery of a weapon following the accused’s disclosure. The court found the trial court had erred in accepting the defense’s alibi evidence, which was based on unverified and inadmissible documents.

The case stemmed from the murder of Mahender Singh, who was shot multiple times in broad daylight. The prosecution argued that the crime was motivated by an election rivalry. Despite the trial court acquitting the accused in 2002, the State of Haryana appealed, challenging the decision. The High Court carefully analyzed the disclosure statements and corroborative evidence, which pointed to the accused’s involvement in the murder.

Weakness of Defense’s Alibi: The defense argued that the accused were not at the crime scene, relying on military records and letters from the time of the incident. However, the court found that these documents were unverified, and the authors of the records did not testify in court​.

Eyewitness Testimony and Disclosure Evidence: The court gave significant weight to the testimony of Ramesh Kumar, who witnessed the crime. His account, corroborated by the recovery of a country-made pistol based on the accused’s disclosure, provided a clear link between the accused and the crime​​.

Inadmissibility of Key Defense Evidence: The court criticized the trial court for relying on photocopies of documents without the original records or the presence of witnesses to authenticate them. The defense failed to meet the burden of proof for the alibi​.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court convicted the accused, setting aside the trial court’s acquittal. The court emphasized the importance of credible evidence, including reliable witness testimony and legally admissible documents, in determining guilt.

This ruling underscores the importance of robust evidence and the court's duty to carefully weigh disclosure statements, witness accounts, and recovered materials when deciding criminal cases. The court’s reversal of the acquittal after more than two decades highlights the enduring need for justice in murder cases.

Date of Decision: October 1, 2024

State of Haryana v. Suresh Kumar & Ors.​.

Latest Legal News