Marumakkathayam Law | Partition Is An Act By Which The Nature Of The Property Is Changed, Reflecting An Alteration In Ownership: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claim | Compensation Must Aim To Restore, As Far As Possible, What Has Been Irretrievably Lost: Supreme Court Awards Rs. 1.02 Crore Personal Criticism Of Judges Or Recording Findings On Their Conduct In Judgments Must Be Avoided: Supreme Court Efficiency In Arbitral Proceedings Is Integral To Effective Dispute Resolution. Courts Must Ensure That Arbitral Processes Reach Their Logical End: Supreme Court Onus Lies On The Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding A Will To The Satisfaction Of The Court: Calcutta High Court Deeds of Gift Not Governed by Section 22-B of Registration Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Testimony Of  Injured Witness Carries A Built-In Guarantee Of Truthfulness: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Murder POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Without Conclusive Proof Of Minority - Burden Lies On The Prosecution: Telangana High Court Credible Eyewitness Account, Supported By Forensic Corroboration, Creates An Unassailable Chain Of Proof That Withstands Scrutiny: Punjab and Haryana High Court Jammu & Kashmir High Court Grants Bail to Schizophrenic Mother Accused of Murdering Infant Son IT Act | Ambiguity in statutory notices undermines the principles of natural justice: Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act: Procedural Lapses Insufficient to Overturn Case Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Accused, Points to Possible Suicide Pact in "Tragic Love Affair" Tampering With Historical Documents To Support A Caste Claim Strikes At The Root Of Public Trust And Cannot Be Tolerated: Bombay High Court Offense Impacts Society as a Whole: Madras High Court Denies Bail in Cyber Harassment Case Custody disputes must be resolved in appropriate forums, and courts cannot intervene beyond legal frameworks in the guise of habeas corpus jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Insubordination Is A Contagious Malady In Any Employment And More So In Public Service : Karnataka High Court imposes Rs. 10,000 fine on Tribunal staff for frivolous petition A Show Cause Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction Cannot Withstand Judicial Scrutiny: AP High Court Sets Aside Rs. 75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand Timely Action is Key: P&H HC Upholds Lawful Retirement at 58 for Class-III Employees Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Applicable to Civil Court Orders: Patna High Court Uttarakhand High Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Acknowledges Cruelty Due to Prolonged Separation Prosecution Must Prove Common Object For An Unlawful Assembly - Conviction Cannot Rest On Assumptions: Telangana High Court

Eyewitness Testimony and Recovered Weapon Tie Accused to Murder: P&H High Court Overturned Acquittal After 22 Years

12 October 2024 7:58 PM

By: sayum


Punjab and Haryana High Court overturned the acquittal of several accused in a 1998 murder case, convicting them based on strong evidence, including an eyewitness account and the recovery of a weapon following the accused’s disclosure. The court found the trial court had erred in accepting the defense’s alibi evidence, which was based on unverified and inadmissible documents.

The case stemmed from the murder of Mahender Singh, who was shot multiple times in broad daylight. The prosecution argued that the crime was motivated by an election rivalry. Despite the trial court acquitting the accused in 2002, the State of Haryana appealed, challenging the decision. The High Court carefully analyzed the disclosure statements and corroborative evidence, which pointed to the accused’s involvement in the murder.

Weakness of Defense’s Alibi: The defense argued that the accused were not at the crime scene, relying on military records and letters from the time of the incident. However, the court found that these documents were unverified, and the authors of the records did not testify in court​.

Eyewitness Testimony and Disclosure Evidence: The court gave significant weight to the testimony of Ramesh Kumar, who witnessed the crime. His account, corroborated by the recovery of a country-made pistol based on the accused’s disclosure, provided a clear link between the accused and the crime​​.

Inadmissibility of Key Defense Evidence: The court criticized the trial court for relying on photocopies of documents without the original records or the presence of witnesses to authenticate them. The defense failed to meet the burden of proof for the alibi​.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court convicted the accused, setting aside the trial court’s acquittal. The court emphasized the importance of credible evidence, including reliable witness testimony and legally admissible documents, in determining guilt.

This ruling underscores the importance of robust evidence and the court's duty to carefully weigh disclosure statements, witness accounts, and recovered materials when deciding criminal cases. The court’s reversal of the acquittal after more than two decades highlights the enduring need for justice in murder cases.

Date of Decision: October 1, 2024

State of Haryana v. Suresh Kumar & Ors.​.

Similar News