Owner Can Avoid Confiscation Under NDPS by Proving Lack of Knowledge or Connivance in Illicit Use of Vehicle: Supreme Court Court is Expert of Experts: High Court Upholds Right to Rebuttal Evidence in Will Dispute Exceptional Circumstances Warrant Use of Inherent Powers to Reduce Sentences in Non-Compoundable Offenses: Supreme Court Execution of Eviction Decree Limited to Suit Premises; Additional Claims Not Permissible: Bombay High Court Only Apprentices Under the 1961 Act Are Excluded from Gratuity – Calcutta High Court Demand for Penalty and Interest Without Following Natural Justice Violates Section 11A of the Central Excise Act: P&H High Court Rajasthan High Court Acquits Bank Manager, Citing "Processing Fee, Not Bribe" in Corruption Case Compensatory Nature of Section 138 NI Act Permits Compounding Even at Revisional Stage: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 99 Crore: Faults Adjudicating Authority for Contradictory Findings Section 138 NI Act | Compounding Permitted Even at Revisional Stage with Reduced Fee in Special Circumstances: HP High Court No Renewal, Only Re-Tendering’ – Upholds Railway Board’s MPS License Policy: Delhi High Court Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes Second FIR Against Former Minister in Corruption Case Nature of Suit Must Be Determined on Evidence, Not Technical Grounds: Delhi High Court on Rejection of Plaint Economic Offences Must Be Scrutinized to Protect Public Interest:  Allahabad High Court Dismisses Plea to Quash FIR Against Cloud Investment Scheme Company Golden Hour Care Is a Matter of Right, Not Privilege: Supreme Court on Road Accident Victim Treatment Limitation Law | When Once the Time Has Begun to Run, Nothing Stops It: Supreme Court Section 14 of Limitation Act Shields Bona Fide Claimants: SC Validates Arbitration Amid Procedural Delay Time Lost Cannot Be Restored, But Justice Can: Supreme Court Orders Immediate Release of Convict Declared Juvenile Bailable Warrants in Domestic Violence Cases Only in Exceptional Circumstances - Domestic Violence Act Cases Are Primarily Remedial, Not Punitive: Supreme Court

"Extended Custody Without Trial Conclusion Leads to Bail Grant: Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Right to Speedy Trial in NDPS Act Case"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Rajasthan High Court, in a significant ruling, has underscored the importance of a speedy trial in granting bail to an accused under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act). The Single Bench, presided over by Justice Rekha Borana, ordered the release of Kailash Kumar, who had been in custody for about three years in connection with FIR No. 65/2021 at the Police Station Nikumbh, District Chittorgarh.In a crucial judgment delivered on March 15, 2024, Justice Borana remarked, "Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to allow this bail application solely on the ground of custody period of the accused petitioner and keeping in view the fact that the trial against him is proceeding at a snail's pace."

Kumar's bail application highlighted the protracted duration of his trial, where only two of the nineteen prosecution witnesses have been examined so far. Citing similar precedents from the Supreme Court, the court acknowledged the critical balance between statutory restrictions and constitutional rights, especially in cases where trials extend beyond reasonable timeframes.

The bail was granted based on prolonged incarceration and the slow progress of the trial, without commenting on the merits of the case. The court has set stringent conditions for the bail, including a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- each, and mandated Kumar's appearance on all dates of hearing.

This decision comes amidst growing concerns over delayed trials and the impact of prolonged custody on the rights of the accused under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court's reliance on several Supreme Court decisions further strengthens the legal framework supporting the grant of bail in cases where the trial's conclusion is extensively delayed.

The judgment has been welcomed by legal experts as a reaffirmation of the judiciary's commitment to upholding the constitutional right to a speedy trial, while also balancing the stringent provisions of the NDPS Act. This ruling is expected to set a precedent for future cases involving extended judicial custody without trial conclusion.

Date of Decision: 15-03-2024

 KAILASH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Similar News