MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |    

"Extended Custody Without Trial Conclusion Leads to Bail Grant: Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Right to Speedy Trial in NDPS Act Case"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Rajasthan High Court, in a significant ruling, has underscored the importance of a speedy trial in granting bail to an accused under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act). The Single Bench, presided over by Justice Rekha Borana, ordered the release of Kailash Kumar, who had been in custody for about three years in connection with FIR No. 65/2021 at the Police Station Nikumbh, District Chittorgarh.In a crucial judgment delivered on March 15, 2024, Justice Borana remarked, "Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to allow this bail application solely on the ground of custody period of the accused petitioner and keeping in view the fact that the trial against him is proceeding at a snail's pace."

Kumar's bail application highlighted the protracted duration of his trial, where only two of the nineteen prosecution witnesses have been examined so far. Citing similar precedents from the Supreme Court, the court acknowledged the critical balance between statutory restrictions and constitutional rights, especially in cases where trials extend beyond reasonable timeframes.

The bail was granted based on prolonged incarceration and the slow progress of the trial, without commenting on the merits of the case. The court has set stringent conditions for the bail, including a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- each, and mandated Kumar's appearance on all dates of hearing.

This decision comes amidst growing concerns over delayed trials and the impact of prolonged custody on the rights of the accused under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court's reliance on several Supreme Court decisions further strengthens the legal framework supporting the grant of bail in cases where the trial's conclusion is extensively delayed.

The judgment has been welcomed by legal experts as a reaffirmation of the judiciary's commitment to upholding the constitutional right to a speedy trial, while also balancing the stringent provisions of the NDPS Act. This ruling is expected to set a precedent for future cases involving extended judicial custody without trial conclusion.

Date of Decision: 15-03-2024

 KAILASH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Similar News