Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court

"Extended Custody Without Trial Conclusion Leads to Bail Grant: Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Right to Speedy Trial in NDPS Act Case"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Rajasthan High Court, in a significant ruling, has underscored the importance of a speedy trial in granting bail to an accused under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act). The Single Bench, presided over by Justice Rekha Borana, ordered the release of Kailash Kumar, who had been in custody for about three years in connection with FIR No. 65/2021 at the Police Station Nikumbh, District Chittorgarh.In a crucial judgment delivered on March 15, 2024, Justice Borana remarked, "Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to allow this bail application solely on the ground of custody period of the accused petitioner and keeping in view the fact that the trial against him is proceeding at a snail's pace."

Kumar's bail application highlighted the protracted duration of his trial, where only two of the nineteen prosecution witnesses have been examined so far. Citing similar precedents from the Supreme Court, the court acknowledged the critical balance between statutory restrictions and constitutional rights, especially in cases where trials extend beyond reasonable timeframes.

The bail was granted based on prolonged incarceration and the slow progress of the trial, without commenting on the merits of the case. The court has set stringent conditions for the bail, including a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- each, and mandated Kumar's appearance on all dates of hearing.

This decision comes amidst growing concerns over delayed trials and the impact of prolonged custody on the rights of the accused under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court's reliance on several Supreme Court decisions further strengthens the legal framework supporting the grant of bail in cases where the trial's conclusion is extensively delayed.

The judgment has been welcomed by legal experts as a reaffirmation of the judiciary's commitment to upholding the constitutional right to a speedy trial, while also balancing the stringent provisions of the NDPS Act. This ruling is expected to set a precedent for future cases involving extended judicial custody without trial conclusion.

Date of Decision: 15-03-2024

 KAILASH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Similar News