Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

"Extended Custody Without Trial Conclusion Leads to Bail Grant: Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Right to Speedy Trial in NDPS Act Case"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Rajasthan High Court, in a significant ruling, has underscored the importance of a speedy trial in granting bail to an accused under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act). The Single Bench, presided over by Justice Rekha Borana, ordered the release of Kailash Kumar, who had been in custody for about three years in connection with FIR No. 65/2021 at the Police Station Nikumbh, District Chittorgarh.In a crucial judgment delivered on March 15, 2024, Justice Borana remarked, "Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to allow this bail application solely on the ground of custody period of the accused petitioner and keeping in view the fact that the trial against him is proceeding at a snail's pace."

Kumar's bail application highlighted the protracted duration of his trial, where only two of the nineteen prosecution witnesses have been examined so far. Citing similar precedents from the Supreme Court, the court acknowledged the critical balance between statutory restrictions and constitutional rights, especially in cases where trials extend beyond reasonable timeframes.

The bail was granted based on prolonged incarceration and the slow progress of the trial, without commenting on the merits of the case. The court has set stringent conditions for the bail, including a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- each, and mandated Kumar's appearance on all dates of hearing.

This decision comes amidst growing concerns over delayed trials and the impact of prolonged custody on the rights of the accused under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court's reliance on several Supreme Court decisions further strengthens the legal framework supporting the grant of bail in cases where the trial's conclusion is extensively delayed.

The judgment has been welcomed by legal experts as a reaffirmation of the judiciary's commitment to upholding the constitutional right to a speedy trial, while also balancing the stringent provisions of the NDPS Act. This ruling is expected to set a precedent for future cases involving extended judicial custody without trial conclusion.

Date of Decision: 15-03-2024

 KAILASH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Latest Legal News