Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Every Person’s Life is Precious: Kerala High Court Upholds Dignity of Life for Prisoners, Permits Online Education for Convicts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision on November 3, 2023, the Kerala High Court, comprising Dr. Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Dr. Justice Kauser Edappagath, underscored the constitutional right to live with human dignity, ruling in favor of two life convicts who sought to pursue higher education via online courses while serving their sentences.

The court observed, “The right of a citizen to live with dignity forms a significant part of the right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India,” reflecting the court’s stance on the intrinsic value of human life and dignity, regardless of a person’s circumstances.

The applicants, both convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and serving life terms, had successfully cleared entrance examinations for the LL.B. course. Despite their incarceration, the court has permitted them to attend the course online, facilitated by the respective prison and college authorities. This decision came after careful consideration of the restrictions on online legal education under the UGC Regulations, 2020, and the Bar Council of India’s stipulations for legal education.

“The restriction on liberty imposed by law on a convict does not take away his right to dignity protected by the Constitution,” the bench stated, emphasizing that the denial of physical attendance at the educational institution should not hinder the convicts’ right to education.

In recognizing education as a powerful mechanism for individual advancement and a fundamental human right, the court has taken a significant step towards the reformation and rehabilitation of convicts. The decision also aligns with international norms and the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, reinforcing the importance of education in prisons.

The ruling has been met with approval from various educational and legal experts, citing it as a progressive move towards integrating technology into the criminal justice system and enhancing the rehabilitative aspects of imprisonment.

The case has set a precedent for honoring the rights of convicts to pursue studies, illustrating the court’s commitment to upholding the dignity and fundamental rights of all citizens, including those behind bars.

Date of Decision: 03 November 2023

PATTAKKA SURESH BABU VS STATE OF KERALA       

Latest Legal News