Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Every Person’s Life is Precious: Kerala High Court Upholds Dignity of Life for Prisoners, Permits Online Education for Convicts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision on November 3, 2023, the Kerala High Court, comprising Dr. Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Dr. Justice Kauser Edappagath, underscored the constitutional right to live with human dignity, ruling in favor of two life convicts who sought to pursue higher education via online courses while serving their sentences.

The court observed, “The right of a citizen to live with dignity forms a significant part of the right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India,” reflecting the court’s stance on the intrinsic value of human life and dignity, regardless of a person’s circumstances.

The applicants, both convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and serving life terms, had successfully cleared entrance examinations for the LL.B. course. Despite their incarceration, the court has permitted them to attend the course online, facilitated by the respective prison and college authorities. This decision came after careful consideration of the restrictions on online legal education under the UGC Regulations, 2020, and the Bar Council of India’s stipulations for legal education.

“The restriction on liberty imposed by law on a convict does not take away his right to dignity protected by the Constitution,” the bench stated, emphasizing that the denial of physical attendance at the educational institution should not hinder the convicts’ right to education.

In recognizing education as a powerful mechanism for individual advancement and a fundamental human right, the court has taken a significant step towards the reformation and rehabilitation of convicts. The decision also aligns with international norms and the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, reinforcing the importance of education in prisons.

The ruling has been met with approval from various educational and legal experts, citing it as a progressive move towards integrating technology into the criminal justice system and enhancing the rehabilitative aspects of imprisonment.

The case has set a precedent for honoring the rights of convicts to pursue studies, illustrating the court’s commitment to upholding the dignity and fundamental rights of all citizens, including those behind bars.

Date of Decision: 03 November 2023

PATTAKKA SURESH BABU VS STATE OF KERALA       

Latest Legal News