Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Every Person’s Life is Precious: Kerala High Court Upholds Dignity of Life for Prisoners, Permits Online Education for Convicts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision on November 3, 2023, the Kerala High Court, comprising Dr. Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Dr. Justice Kauser Edappagath, underscored the constitutional right to live with human dignity, ruling in favor of two life convicts who sought to pursue higher education via online courses while serving their sentences.

The court observed, “The right of a citizen to live with dignity forms a significant part of the right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India,” reflecting the court’s stance on the intrinsic value of human life and dignity, regardless of a person’s circumstances.

The applicants, both convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and serving life terms, had successfully cleared entrance examinations for the LL.B. course. Despite their incarceration, the court has permitted them to attend the course online, facilitated by the respective prison and college authorities. This decision came after careful consideration of the restrictions on online legal education under the UGC Regulations, 2020, and the Bar Council of India’s stipulations for legal education.

“The restriction on liberty imposed by law on a convict does not take away his right to dignity protected by the Constitution,” the bench stated, emphasizing that the denial of physical attendance at the educational institution should not hinder the convicts’ right to education.

In recognizing education as a powerful mechanism for individual advancement and a fundamental human right, the court has taken a significant step towards the reformation and rehabilitation of convicts. The decision also aligns with international norms and the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, reinforcing the importance of education in prisons.

The ruling has been met with approval from various educational and legal experts, citing it as a progressive move towards integrating technology into the criminal justice system and enhancing the rehabilitative aspects of imprisonment.

The case has set a precedent for honoring the rights of convicts to pursue studies, illustrating the court’s commitment to upholding the dignity and fundamental rights of all citizens, including those behind bars.

Date of Decision: 03 November 2023

PATTAKKA SURESH BABU VS STATE OF KERALA       

Latest Legal News