'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court

Every hospital death isn't medical negligence- Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court recently declared that not every hospital death constitutes medical malpractice.

Justices Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, A. S. Bopanna, and J. B. Pardiwala were handling the appeal that contested the NCDRC's decision.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has taken into account the supporting documentation provided for the complaint alleging medical malpractice in this matter. The NCDRC dismissed the case by the in question order but could not discover any instances of medical malpractice.

The Supreme Court stated that it would not be possible for the Court to question the medical judgement of the doctors on the course of medical treatment that was given to the spouse of the first appellant unless the appellants are able to establish before this Court any specific course of conduct suggesting a lack of due medical attention and care.

"Every death in an institutionalised atmosphere of a hospital does not necessarily amount to medical negligence on a hypothetical premise of lack of appropriate medical treatment," the bench said.

The Supreme Court denied the petition in light of the aforementioned.

Devarakonda Surya Sesha Mani & Ors

 Vs

Care Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences & Ors

Download Judgment

[gview file="http://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/11121_2021_2_5_37673_Order_26-Aug-2022.pdf"]

Latest Legal News