Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Every Effort Must be Made to Trace the Missing - Delhi High Court in Habeas Corpus

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court, in a significant judgment on a habeas corpus petition, emphasized the importance of persistent and effective police action in cases of missing children. The bench, comprising Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Shalinder Kaur, highlighted the duty of the police in situations where a minor's whereabouts are unknown.

The case involved a 14-year-old girl who went missing from Lal Bahadur Shastri Hospital in 2018. Despite the availability of CCTV footage showing the girl being harassed by a known individual, Janu, and his cousin Ankit, the police were initially hesitant to file an FIR. It was only after the intervention of the Delhi Commission for Women that an FIR was registered.

In a significant observation, the court stated, "In cases involving missing children, every effort must be made to trace the child. The initial reluctance of the police in such serious matters is unacceptable." This statement underscores the court's stance on the urgency and seriousness required in handling cases of missing minors.

Janu and Ankit confessed to the kidnapping, yet the police failed to trace the girl. The High Court, acknowledging the ongoing investigation, disposed of the petition but mandated the police to file quarterly status reports on their progress to the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the critical role law enforcement plays in protecting the most vulnerable members of society. The court's directive for continuous vigilance in unresolved cases sets a precedent for future investigations involving missing children.

The petitioner was represented by Mr. Arbaaz Khan and Mr. Shalanki Prasad, while the respondent, the State (NCT of Delhi), was represented by Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.), with Mr. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Abhinav Krumar Arya, and Mr. Shivesh Kaushik, along with ACP/AHTU/Crime and SI Gunjan Singh AHTU/Crime Branch.

Date of Decision: November 10, 2023

SHIVDEVI VS STATE (NCT OF DELHI)       

Latest Legal News