Lack Of Boundaries In Sale Deed Not Fatal To Title If Plot Number & Parent Title Are Sufficiently Identifiable: Calcutta High Court Terror Perception Of Underworld Justifies Delay In Invoking MCOCA; Purely Civil Disputes Can Metamorphose Into Criminal Offence: Bombay High Court Identical Wills Executed By Spouses On Same Day Not Necessarily 'Mutual Wills' Restricting Power Of Alienation: Delhi High Court Written Notice Not Mandatory For Revoking Permission Under Section 41 Presidency Small Cause Courts Act: Gujarat High Court Wife Cannot Maintain Complaint Against Husband Under Senior Citizens Act; Not Intended For Spousal Disputes: Karnataka High Court Mere Presence At Scene Or Facilitation Without Intent To Aid Crime Does Not Amount To Abetment: Delhi High Court Offences Under IT Act Punishable With 3 Years Imprisonment Are Bailable Under Section 77B: Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail In KCA Data Theft Case Premature Release Can't Be Denied Citing Section 435 CrPC If Sentence Under Central Act Is Already Served: Madras High Court Suppression Of Higher Qualification To Secure Job Reserved For Lower Education Is Foundational Fraud, Sympathy Has No Role: Supreme Court MBBS Admissions | Candidate Using NIOS Marks To Meet 50% Eligibility Cannot Claim State Govt School Quota: Orissa High Court High Court Cannot Exercise Article 227 Power To Strike Off Plaint When Remedy Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Exists: Madras High Court Section 69 IEA | Onus On Propounder To Lead Secondary Evidence & Remove Suspicious Circumstances If Attesting Witnesses Are Dead: Telangana High Court

Every Effort Must be Made to Trace the Missing - Delhi High Court in Habeas Corpus

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court, in a significant judgment on a habeas corpus petition, emphasized the importance of persistent and effective police action in cases of missing children. The bench, comprising Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Shalinder Kaur, highlighted the duty of the police in situations where a minor's whereabouts are unknown.

The case involved a 14-year-old girl who went missing from Lal Bahadur Shastri Hospital in 2018. Despite the availability of CCTV footage showing the girl being harassed by a known individual, Janu, and his cousin Ankit, the police were initially hesitant to file an FIR. It was only after the intervention of the Delhi Commission for Women that an FIR was registered.

In a significant observation, the court stated, "In cases involving missing children, every effort must be made to trace the child. The initial reluctance of the police in such serious matters is unacceptable." This statement underscores the court's stance on the urgency and seriousness required in handling cases of missing minors.

Janu and Ankit confessed to the kidnapping, yet the police failed to trace the girl. The High Court, acknowledging the ongoing investigation, disposed of the petition but mandated the police to file quarterly status reports on their progress to the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the critical role law enforcement plays in protecting the most vulnerable members of society. The court's directive for continuous vigilance in unresolved cases sets a precedent for future investigations involving missing children.

The petitioner was represented by Mr. Arbaaz Khan and Mr. Shalanki Prasad, while the respondent, the State (NCT of Delhi), was represented by Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.), with Mr. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Abhinav Krumar Arya, and Mr. Shivesh Kaushik, along with ACP/AHTU/Crime and SI Gunjan Singh AHTU/Crime Branch.

Date of Decision: November 10, 2023

SHIVDEVI VS STATE (NCT OF DELHI)       

Latest Legal News