Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     When Two Accused Face Identical Charges, One Cannot Be Convicted While the Other is Acquitted: Supreme Court Emphasizes Principle of Parity in Acquittal    |     Supreme Court Limits Interim Protection for Financial Institutions, Modifies Order on FIRs Filed by Borrowers    |     Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail in Methamphetamine Case After Delay in Chemical Analysis Report    |     No Sign of Recent Intercourse; No Injury Was Found On Her Body Or Private Parts: Gauhati High Court Acquits Two In Gang Rape Case    |     Failure to Disclose Relationship with Key Stakeholder Led to Setting Aside of Arbitral Award: Gujarat High Court    |     Strict Compliance with UAPA's 7-Day Timeline for Sanctions is Essential:  Supreme Court    |     PAT Teachers Entitled to Regularization from 2014, Quashes Prospective Regularization as Arbitrary: Himachal Pradesh High Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Anonymity Protections for Victims in Sensitive Cases: Right to Privacy Prevails Over Right to Information    |     Certified Copy of Will Admissible Under Registration Act, 1908: Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea for Production of Original Will    |     Injuries on Non-Vital Parts Do Not Warrant Conviction for Attempt to Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Modifies Conviction Under Section 307 IPC to Section 326 IPC    |     Classification Based on Wikipedia Data Inadmissible; Tribunal to Reassess Using Actual Financial Records: PH High Court Orders Reconsideration of Wage Dispute    |     Mere Delay in Initiation Does Not Justify Reduction of Damages: Jharkhand High Court on Provident Fund Defaults    |     Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     An Award that Shocks the Conscience of the Court Cannot Stand, Especially When Public Money is Involved: Calcutta HC Reduces Quantum by Half    |     Trademark Transaction Within Territoriality Principle Subject to Indian Tax Laws: Bombay High Court Dismisses Hindustan Unilever's Petition on Non-Deduction of TDS    |     Concealment of Material Facts Bars Relief under Article 226: SC Reprimands Petitioners for Lack of Bonafides    |     Without Determination of the Will's Genuineness, Partition is Impossible: Supreme Court on Liberal Approach to Pleading Amendments    |     Candidates Cannot Challenge a Selection Process After Participating Without Protest : Delhi High Court Upholds ISRO's Administrative Officer Recruitment    |     Invalid Bank Guarantee Invocation Found Fatal to Recovery Claim: Delhi High Court Dismisses GAIL’s Appeal    |     Adverse Remarks in APAR Recorded Without Objectivity and Likely Motivated by Bias: Delhi High Court Quashes Biased APAR Downgrade of CRPF Officer    |    

Every Effort Must be Made to Trace the Missing - Delhi High Court in Habeas Corpus

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court, in a significant judgment on a habeas corpus petition, emphasized the importance of persistent and effective police action in cases of missing children. The bench, comprising Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Shalinder Kaur, highlighted the duty of the police in situations where a minor's whereabouts are unknown.

The case involved a 14-year-old girl who went missing from Lal Bahadur Shastri Hospital in 2018. Despite the availability of CCTV footage showing the girl being harassed by a known individual, Janu, and his cousin Ankit, the police were initially hesitant to file an FIR. It was only after the intervention of the Delhi Commission for Women that an FIR was registered.

In a significant observation, the court stated, "In cases involving missing children, every effort must be made to trace the child. The initial reluctance of the police in such serious matters is unacceptable." This statement underscores the court's stance on the urgency and seriousness required in handling cases of missing minors.

Janu and Ankit confessed to the kidnapping, yet the police failed to trace the girl. The High Court, acknowledging the ongoing investigation, disposed of the petition but mandated the police to file quarterly status reports on their progress to the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the critical role law enforcement plays in protecting the most vulnerable members of society. The court's directive for continuous vigilance in unresolved cases sets a precedent for future investigations involving missing children.

The petitioner was represented by Mr. Arbaaz Khan and Mr. Shalanki Prasad, while the respondent, the State (NCT of Delhi), was represented by Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.), with Mr. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Abhinav Krumar Arya, and Mr. Shivesh Kaushik, along with ACP/AHTU/Crime and SI Gunjan Singh AHTU/Crime Branch.

Date of Decision: November 10, 2023

SHIVDEVI VS STATE (NCT OF DELHI)       

Similar News