Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |     Punjab & Haryana HC Double Bench Upholds Protection for Married Partners in Live-In Relationships, Denies Same for Minors    |    

Ethical Considerations and Future Care for Mother and Fetus: Delhi High Court Recalls Judgment on Late Pregnancy Termination

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the complexities of medical termination of pregnancies, the Delhi High Court has recalled its earlier judgment that permitted the termination of a 30-week pregnancy. The court's decision pivoted on "ethical considerations and future care" for both the mother and the fetus, especially given the absence of fetal abnormalities.

The petitioner, who had lost her husband and suffered severe depression, initially sought termination citing grave injury to her mental health. However, detailed psychological assessments and medical reports from AIIMS played a crucial role in the court's reconsideration of the matter.

Justice Subramonium Prasad, while delivering the judgment, emphasized the intricate balance between medical guidelines and ethical considerations in such sensitive cases. "The guidelines dated 14.08.2017 issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, provide for termination of pregnancy beyond 20 weeks in specific cases. However, in the present case, no such circumstances exist, and therefore, the said guidelines cannot be pressed for permitting feticide," the judge observed.

The court highlighted the psychological assessment of the petitioner, pointing out that although she suffered from severe depression, there were no psychotic features that could justify the late termination of pregnancy. The judgment also brought attention to the potential physical and mental deficiencies a preterm baby might suffer and the implications for the child's future.

In a compassionate move, the court assured the petitioner of medical and psychological support. "If the Petitioner is inclined to undergo her delivery at any Central Government Hospital, the Central Government shall bear all the medical expenses and all other incidental charges of the delivery," the judgment read.

Furthermore, addressing the petitioner's future concerns, the court stated, "If the Petitioner is inclined to give the new born child in adoption, then the Union of India shall ensure that the process of adoption takes place at the earliest and in a smooth fashion."

Date of decision: 23 JANUARY, 2024

R VS THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ORS.

 

Similar News