Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Ethical Considerations and Future Care for Mother and Fetus: Delhi High Court Recalls Judgment on Late Pregnancy Termination

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the complexities of medical termination of pregnancies, the Delhi High Court has recalled its earlier judgment that permitted the termination of a 30-week pregnancy. The court's decision pivoted on "ethical considerations and future care" for both the mother and the fetus, especially given the absence of fetal abnormalities.

The petitioner, who had lost her husband and suffered severe depression, initially sought termination citing grave injury to her mental health. However, detailed psychological assessments and medical reports from AIIMS played a crucial role in the court's reconsideration of the matter.

Justice Subramonium Prasad, while delivering the judgment, emphasized the intricate balance between medical guidelines and ethical considerations in such sensitive cases. "The guidelines dated 14.08.2017 issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, provide for termination of pregnancy beyond 20 weeks in specific cases. However, in the present case, no such circumstances exist, and therefore, the said guidelines cannot be pressed for permitting feticide," the judge observed.

The court highlighted the psychological assessment of the petitioner, pointing out that although she suffered from severe depression, there were no psychotic features that could justify the late termination of pregnancy. The judgment also brought attention to the potential physical and mental deficiencies a preterm baby might suffer and the implications for the child's future.

In a compassionate move, the court assured the petitioner of medical and psychological support. "If the Petitioner is inclined to undergo her delivery at any Central Government Hospital, the Central Government shall bear all the medical expenses and all other incidental charges of the delivery," the judgment read.

Furthermore, addressing the petitioner's future concerns, the court stated, "If the Petitioner is inclined to give the new born child in adoption, then the Union of India shall ensure that the process of adoption takes place at the earliest and in a smooth fashion."

Date of decision: 23 JANUARY, 2024

R VS THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ORS.

 

Latest Legal News