Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Permissive Use Cannot Ripen into Right of Prescriptive Easement: Kerala High Court High Court Slams Procedural Delays, Orders FSL Report in Assault Case to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Ethical Considerations and Future Care for Mother and Fetus: Delhi High Court Recalls Judgment on Late Pregnancy Termination

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the complexities of medical termination of pregnancies, the Delhi High Court has recalled its earlier judgment that permitted the termination of a 30-week pregnancy. The court's decision pivoted on "ethical considerations and future care" for both the mother and the fetus, especially given the absence of fetal abnormalities.

The petitioner, who had lost her husband and suffered severe depression, initially sought termination citing grave injury to her mental health. However, detailed psychological assessments and medical reports from AIIMS played a crucial role in the court's reconsideration of the matter.

Justice Subramonium Prasad, while delivering the judgment, emphasized the intricate balance between medical guidelines and ethical considerations in such sensitive cases. "The guidelines dated 14.08.2017 issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, provide for termination of pregnancy beyond 20 weeks in specific cases. However, in the present case, no such circumstances exist, and therefore, the said guidelines cannot be pressed for permitting feticide," the judge observed.

The court highlighted the psychological assessment of the petitioner, pointing out that although she suffered from severe depression, there were no psychotic features that could justify the late termination of pregnancy. The judgment also brought attention to the potential physical and mental deficiencies a preterm baby might suffer and the implications for the child's future.

In a compassionate move, the court assured the petitioner of medical and psychological support. "If the Petitioner is inclined to undergo her delivery at any Central Government Hospital, the Central Government shall bear all the medical expenses and all other incidental charges of the delivery," the judgment read.

Furthermore, addressing the petitioner's future concerns, the court stated, "If the Petitioner is inclined to give the new born child in adoption, then the Union of India shall ensure that the process of adoption takes place at the earliest and in a smooth fashion."

Date of decision: 23 JANUARY, 2024

R VS THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ORS.

 

Similar News