Absence of Videography Alone Not Sufficient For Bail When Custody is Less Than a Year: Delhi High Court Refuses Bail in Commercial Quantity Heroin Use of Permitted Synthetic Colour in Dal Masur Still Constitutes Adulteration: Punjab & Haryana High Court Uphold Conviction Penalty Must Not Result in Civil Death of Professionals: Delhi High Court Reduces Two-Year Suspension of Insolvency Professional, Citing Disproportionate Punishment Right of Cross-Examination is Statutory, Cannot Be Denied When Documents Are Exhibited Later: Chhattisgarh High Court Allows Re-Cross-Examination Compounding after Adjudication is Impermissible under FEMA: Calcutta High Court Declines Post-Adjudication Compounding Plea Tears of a Child Speak Louder Than Words: Bombay HC Confirms Life Term for Man Who Raped 4-Year-Old Alleged Dowry Death After Forced Remarriage: Allahabad High Court Finds No Evidence of Strangulation or Demand “Even If Executant Has No Title, Registrar Must Register the Document If Formalities Are Met” — Supreme Court  Declares Tamil Nadu's Rule 55A(i) Ultra Vires the Registration Act, 1908 Res Judicata Is Not Optional – It’s Public Policy: Supreme Court Slams SEBI for Passing Second Final Order in Fraud Case Against Vital Communications Ltd A Person Has Died… Insurance Company Cannot Escape Liability Without Proving Policy Violation: Supreme Court Slams High Court for Exonerating Insurer in Fatal Accident Case Calling Someone by Caste Name Is Not Enough – It Must Be Publicly Done to Attract SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Acquits All in Jharkhand Land Dispute Case Broken Promises Don’t Make Rape – Mature Adults in Long-Term Relationships Must Accept Responsibility: Supreme Court Quashes Rape Case Against NRI Man Every Broken Relationship Can’t Be Branded Rape: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Retired Judge Accused of Sexual Exploitation on Promise of Marriage No Evidence, No Motive, Not Even Proof of Murder: Supreme Court Slams Conviction, Acquits Man Accused of Killing Wife After Two Years of Marriage You Can’t Assume Silence Is Consent: Supreme Court Sends Back ₹46 Lakh Insurance Dispute to NCDRC for Fresh Determination “Voyage Must Start and End Before Monsoon Sets In — But What If That’s Practically Impossible?” SC Rules Against Insurance Company in Shipping Dispute No Criminal Case Can Be Built on a Land Deal That’s Three Decades Old Without Specific Allegations: Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of FIR Against Ex-JK Housing Chief Just Giving a Call for Protest Doesn’t Make One Criminally Liable - Rail Roko Protest Quashed Against KCR Ex-CM: Telangana High Court Ends 13-Year-Old Proceedings for 2011 Telangana Agitation This Is Not a Case of Greed Simplicitor but a Celebration of Fraud: Karnataka High Court Grants Specific Performance, Slams Vendor for Violating Court Orders

Entire Weight of Contraband to Be Considered – Punjab and Haryana HC Denies Bail in NDPS Act Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a significant ruling, has dismissed the bail petition of Sanjay Upadhya, involved in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). Justice Deepak Gupta, presiding over the matter, held that the entire weight of the recovered material, including seeds when accompanied by the flowering tops, should be considered in NDPS cases. This ruling came in the backdrop of a detailed analysis of the definition of ‘ganja’ under the NDPS Act.

The case, CRM-M-44787 of 2023, reserved on January 12 and pronounced on January 16, involved the petitioner, Sanjay Upadhya, who was arrested for the illegal sale and possession of ganja. As per the prosecution, Upadhya was found with 2 Kg and 30 Kg of ganja in two separate instances. The petitioner’s counsel argued for non-compliance of Section 42 of the NDPS Act and contended that the seized material, which included seeds, did not fall under the Act’s definition of ganja.

However, the High Court observed, “It is clear on bare perusal of the afore-said definition of ‘ganja’ that seeds and leaves are excluded from the definition of ganja, only when the same are not accompanied by the tops.” This interpretation effectively meant that the full weight of the material recovered from the petitioner was subject to consideration under the NDPS Act.

The Court also noted the petitioner’s criminal history, mentioning that he is a habitual offender dealing in drug trafficking. “These details contained in the custody certificate in itself are sufficient to show that the petitioner is a habitual offender dealing in drug trafficking,” Justice Gupta remarked.

Referring to similar judicial decisions, the Court reinforced its stance on the interpretation of the NDPS Act. This ruling is expected to have significant implications in how cases under the NDPS Act are adjudicated, especially concerning the definition and weight considerations of ganja.

Date of Decision: 16.01.2024

Sanjay Upadhya VS State of Punjab

 

Similar News