Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Entire Weight of Contraband to Be Considered – Punjab and Haryana HC Denies Bail in NDPS Act Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a significant ruling, has dismissed the bail petition of Sanjay Upadhya, involved in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). Justice Deepak Gupta, presiding over the matter, held that the entire weight of the recovered material, including seeds when accompanied by the flowering tops, should be considered in NDPS cases. This ruling came in the backdrop of a detailed analysis of the definition of ‘ganja’ under the NDPS Act.

The case, CRM-M-44787 of 2023, reserved on January 12 and pronounced on January 16, involved the petitioner, Sanjay Upadhya, who was arrested for the illegal sale and possession of ganja. As per the prosecution, Upadhya was found with 2 Kg and 30 Kg of ganja in two separate instances. The petitioner’s counsel argued for non-compliance of Section 42 of the NDPS Act and contended that the seized material, which included seeds, did not fall under the Act’s definition of ganja.

However, the High Court observed, “It is clear on bare perusal of the afore-said definition of ‘ganja’ that seeds and leaves are excluded from the definition of ganja, only when the same are not accompanied by the tops.” This interpretation effectively meant that the full weight of the material recovered from the petitioner was subject to consideration under the NDPS Act.

The Court also noted the petitioner’s criminal history, mentioning that he is a habitual offender dealing in drug trafficking. “These details contained in the custody certificate in itself are sufficient to show that the petitioner is a habitual offender dealing in drug trafficking,” Justice Gupta remarked.

Referring to similar judicial decisions, the Court reinforced its stance on the interpretation of the NDPS Act. This ruling is expected to have significant implications in how cases under the NDPS Act are adjudicated, especially concerning the definition and weight considerations of ganja.

Date of Decision: 16.01.2024

Sanjay Upadhya VS State of Punjab

 

Similar News