Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal

Entire Weight of Contraband to Be Considered – Punjab and Haryana HC Denies Bail in NDPS Act Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a significant ruling, has dismissed the bail petition of Sanjay Upadhya, involved in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). Justice Deepak Gupta, presiding over the matter, held that the entire weight of the recovered material, including seeds when accompanied by the flowering tops, should be considered in NDPS cases. This ruling came in the backdrop of a detailed analysis of the definition of ‘ganja’ under the NDPS Act.

The case, CRM-M-44787 of 2023, reserved on January 12 and pronounced on January 16, involved the petitioner, Sanjay Upadhya, who was arrested for the illegal sale and possession of ganja. As per the prosecution, Upadhya was found with 2 Kg and 30 Kg of ganja in two separate instances. The petitioner’s counsel argued for non-compliance of Section 42 of the NDPS Act and contended that the seized material, which included seeds, did not fall under the Act’s definition of ganja.

However, the High Court observed, “It is clear on bare perusal of the afore-said definition of ‘ganja’ that seeds and leaves are excluded from the definition of ganja, only when the same are not accompanied by the tops.” This interpretation effectively meant that the full weight of the material recovered from the petitioner was subject to consideration under the NDPS Act.

The Court also noted the petitioner’s criminal history, mentioning that he is a habitual offender dealing in drug trafficking. “These details contained in the custody certificate in itself are sufficient to show that the petitioner is a habitual offender dealing in drug trafficking,” Justice Gupta remarked.

Referring to similar judicial decisions, the Court reinforced its stance on the interpretation of the NDPS Act. This ruling is expected to have significant implications in how cases under the NDPS Act are adjudicated, especially concerning the definition and weight considerations of ganja.

Date of Decision: 16.01.2024

Sanjay Upadhya VS State of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News