Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

“Employer Cannot Benefit from Its Own Wrong”: Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court’s Award on Reinstatement with Full Back Wages

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision , the Gujarat High Court dismissed an appeal by Cargo Motors (Gujarat) Limited, thereby affirming the Labour Court’s award of reinstatement with full back wages to the workman, Kritikant Shivajirav Jadav.

The bench, comprising Honourable Chief Justice Mrs. Justice Sunita Agarwal and Honourable Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria, stated, “It is settled law that in a case of termination of employment, though award of back wages is not automatic with the award of reinstatement, but in case the fault is found on the part of the employer, 100% wages can be provided.”

The case revolved around the wrongful termination of the workman, with the Labour Court initially taking around 17 years to decide on the reference. The High Court noted that there was no explanation offered for the delay in reinstating the workman for a period of 1 year and 7 months.

The appellant employer had challenged the award of 100% back wages, arguing that it should not be automatic upon reinstatement. However, the court observed that the workman had been victimized by the employer, stating, “The fundamental principle is that no one can take benefit of its own wrong.”

The court also referred to various Apex Court decisions, including Deepali Gundu Surwase vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya, to assert that in cases of wrongful termination, reinstatement with full back wages is the normal rule.

The appeal was dismissed, and the Civil Application also stands disposed of, thereby upholding the Labour Court’s original award.

Date of Decision: 07/08/2023

CARGO MOTORS ( GUJARAT ) LIMITED  vs KRITIKANT SHIVAJIRAV JADAV

Latest Legal News