Non-Compliance With Rule 14 Of NDPS Rules 2022 Regarding Quantitative Test Vitiates Prosecution Case And Renders Detention Illegal: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Directs Systematic Audit And Institutional Accountability For Safety In Public Spaces Under Article 21 Extra-Judicial Confession Made Before Police Cannot Solely Sustain Preventive Detention: Supreme Court Pre-Trial Incarceration Cannot Masquerade As Punitive Detention When Trial Is Not Imminent: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Radial ‘Hub-And-Spoke’ Valuation Models For Contiguous Lands Are Legally Unsustainable: Supreme Court Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Is A Valid Consequence Upon Failure To Pay Balance Sale Consideration Under IBC Liquidation Process: Supreme Court Res Judicata | Suit For Specific Performance Barred If Relief Was Available In Prior Suit For Permanent Injunction And Not Claimed: Supreme Court RERA | Allottee’s Right To Seek Refund Is Absolute And Unqualified, Not Subject To Promoter’s Completion Of Project: Bombay High Court Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC | Appellate Court Cannot Summarily Reject Addition Of Legal Heirs Based On Unproven Documents Without Reason: Calcutta High Court Order XIV Rule 5 CPC | Trial Court Must Frame Additional Issues Based On Liberty Granted By Supreme Court To Ensure Just Adjudication: Delhi High Court Mere Citation Of Wrong Provision Does Not Invalidate Order If Court Possessed Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Cannot Be Granted Over Large Unidentified Tract Of Land Without Establishing Prima Facie Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 125 CrPC | Mere Rejection Of Permanent Alimony Plea In Divorce Proceedings Does Not Bar Claim For Maintenance: Karnataka High Court Section 311 BNSS | Trial Court Has Discretion To Record Evidence In Narrative Form; Accused Cannot Insist On Question-Answer Format: Kerala High Court Section 482 CrPC | Principle Of Parity Cannot Be Invoked To Quash FIR If Allegations Against Accused Are Distinct And Substantiated: Madhya Pradesh High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal Cannot Grant 'Right Of Recovery' To Insurer Without Evidence Of Policy Violation: Orissa High Court Mere Inadequacy Of Consideration Or Illiteracy Does Not Vitiate Specific Performance Unless Exploitation Is Proved: Madras High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Converted Into Parallel Forum To Enforce Civil Decrees: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 18 Rule 17 CPC | Reopening Evidence At The Stage Of Arguments Without Compelling Grounds Amounts To Abuse Of Process: Telangana High Court Cannot Circumvent Bail Granted By Supreme Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PITNDPS Preventive Detention Order

“Employer Cannot Benefit from Its Own Wrong”: Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court’s Award on Reinstatement with Full Back Wages

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision , the Gujarat High Court dismissed an appeal by Cargo Motors (Gujarat) Limited, thereby affirming the Labour Court’s award of reinstatement with full back wages to the workman, Kritikant Shivajirav Jadav.

The bench, comprising Honourable Chief Justice Mrs. Justice Sunita Agarwal and Honourable Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria, stated, “It is settled law that in a case of termination of employment, though award of back wages is not automatic with the award of reinstatement, but in case the fault is found on the part of the employer, 100% wages can be provided.”

The case revolved around the wrongful termination of the workman, with the Labour Court initially taking around 17 years to decide on the reference. The High Court noted that there was no explanation offered for the delay in reinstating the workman for a period of 1 year and 7 months.

The appellant employer had challenged the award of 100% back wages, arguing that it should not be automatic upon reinstatement. However, the court observed that the workman had been victimized by the employer, stating, “The fundamental principle is that no one can take benefit of its own wrong.”

The court also referred to various Apex Court decisions, including Deepali Gundu Surwase vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya, to assert that in cases of wrongful termination, reinstatement with full back wages is the normal rule.

The appeal was dismissed, and the Civil Application also stands disposed of, thereby upholding the Labour Court’s original award.

Date of Decision: 07/08/2023

CARGO MOTORS ( GUJARAT ) LIMITED  vs KRITIKANT SHIVAJIRAV JADAV

Latest Legal News