High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

“Employer Cannot Benefit from Its Own Wrong”: Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court’s Award on Reinstatement with Full Back Wages

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision , the Gujarat High Court dismissed an appeal by Cargo Motors (Gujarat) Limited, thereby affirming the Labour Court’s award of reinstatement with full back wages to the workman, Kritikant Shivajirav Jadav.

The bench, comprising Honourable Chief Justice Mrs. Justice Sunita Agarwal and Honourable Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria, stated, “It is settled law that in a case of termination of employment, though award of back wages is not automatic with the award of reinstatement, but in case the fault is found on the part of the employer, 100% wages can be provided.”

The case revolved around the wrongful termination of the workman, with the Labour Court initially taking around 17 years to decide on the reference. The High Court noted that there was no explanation offered for the delay in reinstating the workman for a period of 1 year and 7 months.

The appellant employer had challenged the award of 100% back wages, arguing that it should not be automatic upon reinstatement. However, the court observed that the workman had been victimized by the employer, stating, “The fundamental principle is that no one can take benefit of its own wrong.”

The court also referred to various Apex Court decisions, including Deepali Gundu Surwase vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya, to assert that in cases of wrongful termination, reinstatement with full back wages is the normal rule.

The appeal was dismissed, and the Civil Application also stands disposed of, thereby upholding the Labour Court’s original award.

Date of Decision: 07/08/2023

CARGO MOTORS ( GUJARAT ) LIMITED  vs KRITIKANT SHIVAJIRAV JADAV

Latest Legal News