Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

“Employer Cannot Benefit from Its Own Wrong”: Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court’s Award on Reinstatement with Full Back Wages

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision , the Gujarat High Court dismissed an appeal by Cargo Motors (Gujarat) Limited, thereby affirming the Labour Court’s award of reinstatement with full back wages to the workman, Kritikant Shivajirav Jadav.

The bench, comprising Honourable Chief Justice Mrs. Justice Sunita Agarwal and Honourable Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria, stated, “It is settled law that in a case of termination of employment, though award of back wages is not automatic with the award of reinstatement, but in case the fault is found on the part of the employer, 100% wages can be provided.”

The case revolved around the wrongful termination of the workman, with the Labour Court initially taking around 17 years to decide on the reference. The High Court noted that there was no explanation offered for the delay in reinstating the workman for a period of 1 year and 7 months.

The appellant employer had challenged the award of 100% back wages, arguing that it should not be automatic upon reinstatement. However, the court observed that the workman had been victimized by the employer, stating, “The fundamental principle is that no one can take benefit of its own wrong.”

The court also referred to various Apex Court decisions, including Deepali Gundu Surwase vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya, to assert that in cases of wrongful termination, reinstatement with full back wages is the normal rule.

The appeal was dismissed, and the Civil Application also stands disposed of, thereby upholding the Labour Court’s original award.

Date of Decision: 07/08/2023

CARGO MOTORS ( GUJARAT ) LIMITED  vs KRITIKANT SHIVAJIRAV JADAV

Latest Legal News