MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Embezzlement Of PSPCL Materials Worth Over Rs. 1.15 Crores: Anticipatory Bail Rejected: P&H High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant Judgemnent by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, the anticipatory bail plea of Harkanwaljit Singh, involved in the misappropriation of materials from Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL), was dismissed. The case, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, highlights the stringent approach of the judiciary in cases involving substantial financial irregularities.

The FIR, lodged under Sections 409 and 120-B of the IPC, 1860, at Police Station City Kotkapura, District Faridkot, brought to light the alleged embezzlement of PSPCL materials worth over Rs. 1.15 crores. The court, in its observation, noted that “prima facie, it is the petitioner who is liable for having defalcated material (stock and scrap) from the Central Store, Kotkapura to the extent of approximately Rs.1.15 crores.”

In the detailed judgement, Justice Bedi emphasized the gravity of the offence, stating that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner was necessary for the recovery of misappropriated property and the logical conclusion of the investigation. The court’s decision was heavily influenced by the findings of an inquiry report and an affidavit from the Deputy Superintendent of Police, which pointed towards the petitioner’s significant involvement in the misappropriation.

The ruling also referenced the Supreme Court judgement in Sumitha Pradeep Vs. Arun Kumar C.K. & Anr., underscoring the importance of considering the prima facie case against the accused in bail matters.

Representing the petitioner was Mr. Shakti Bhardwaj, while the State of Punjab was represented by Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sehajbir Singh advocated for the complainant.

This decision marks a notable stance by the High Court in addressing cases of significant financial misconduct, sending a strong message about the consequences of such actions. The observations made by the court are specific to this anticipatory bail petition and do not influence the trial court’s adjudication, which will be based on the evidence presented.

Date of Decision: 07.11.2023

HARKANWALJIT SINGH  VS STATE OF PUNJAB     

Latest Legal News