Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Embezzlement Of PSPCL Materials Worth Over Rs. 1.15 Crores: Anticipatory Bail Rejected: P&H High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant Judgemnent by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, the anticipatory bail plea of Harkanwaljit Singh, involved in the misappropriation of materials from Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL), was dismissed. The case, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, highlights the stringent approach of the judiciary in cases involving substantial financial irregularities.

The FIR, lodged under Sections 409 and 120-B of the IPC, 1860, at Police Station City Kotkapura, District Faridkot, brought to light the alleged embezzlement of PSPCL materials worth over Rs. 1.15 crores. The court, in its observation, noted that “prima facie, it is the petitioner who is liable for having defalcated material (stock and scrap) from the Central Store, Kotkapura to the extent of approximately Rs.1.15 crores.”

In the detailed judgement, Justice Bedi emphasized the gravity of the offence, stating that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner was necessary for the recovery of misappropriated property and the logical conclusion of the investigation. The court’s decision was heavily influenced by the findings of an inquiry report and an affidavit from the Deputy Superintendent of Police, which pointed towards the petitioner’s significant involvement in the misappropriation.

The ruling also referenced the Supreme Court judgement in Sumitha Pradeep Vs. Arun Kumar C.K. & Anr., underscoring the importance of considering the prima facie case against the accused in bail matters.

Representing the petitioner was Mr. Shakti Bhardwaj, while the State of Punjab was represented by Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sehajbir Singh advocated for the complainant.

This decision marks a notable stance by the High Court in addressing cases of significant financial misconduct, sending a strong message about the consequences of such actions. The observations made by the court are specific to this anticipatory bail petition and do not influence the trial court’s adjudication, which will be based on the evidence presented.

Date of Decision: 07.11.2023

HARKANWALJIT SINGH  VS STATE OF PUNJAB     

Latest Legal News