Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Embezzlement Of PSPCL Materials Worth Over Rs. 1.15 Crores: Anticipatory Bail Rejected: P&H High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant Judgemnent by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, the anticipatory bail plea of Harkanwaljit Singh, involved in the misappropriation of materials from Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL), was dismissed. The case, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, highlights the stringent approach of the judiciary in cases involving substantial financial irregularities.

The FIR, lodged under Sections 409 and 120-B of the IPC, 1860, at Police Station City Kotkapura, District Faridkot, brought to light the alleged embezzlement of PSPCL materials worth over Rs. 1.15 crores. The court, in its observation, noted that “prima facie, it is the petitioner who is liable for having defalcated material (stock and scrap) from the Central Store, Kotkapura to the extent of approximately Rs.1.15 crores.”

In the detailed judgement, Justice Bedi emphasized the gravity of the offence, stating that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner was necessary for the recovery of misappropriated property and the logical conclusion of the investigation. The court’s decision was heavily influenced by the findings of an inquiry report and an affidavit from the Deputy Superintendent of Police, which pointed towards the petitioner’s significant involvement in the misappropriation.

The ruling also referenced the Supreme Court judgement in Sumitha Pradeep Vs. Arun Kumar C.K. & Anr., underscoring the importance of considering the prima facie case against the accused in bail matters.

Representing the petitioner was Mr. Shakti Bhardwaj, while the State of Punjab was represented by Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sehajbir Singh advocated for the complainant.

This decision marks a notable stance by the High Court in addressing cases of significant financial misconduct, sending a strong message about the consequences of such actions. The observations made by the court are specific to this anticipatory bail petition and do not influence the trial court’s adjudication, which will be based on the evidence presented.

Date of Decision: 07.11.2023

HARKANWALJIT SINGH  VS STATE OF PUNJAB     

Latest Legal News