MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Educational Pursuits Must Not Obstruct Legal Duties: Bombay High Court Permits MBA Aspirant's Departure with Strict Conditions

07 December 2024 7:21 PM

By: sayum


The Bombay High Court has permitted Rajdeep Singh, the petitioner, to commence his MBA program at MIT, despite an ongoing inquiry into his inheritance under the Income Tax Department's scrutiny. The court outlined a series of conditions ensuring Singh's cooperation with the investigation while allowing him to pursue his academic ambitions.

Rajdeep Singh, who inherited a 70% share in an immovable property from a non-relative, is under investigation by the Income Tax Department. The inquiry focuses on the legitimacy of this inheritance and its implications under tax laws. Singh's estranged wife inherited the remaining 30% of the property. Singh petitioned the court to allow him to begin his MBA studies at MIT, asserting that he could comply with the inquiry requirements while abroad.

The court underscored the importance of balancing Singh's educational aspirations with the need to ensure his participation in the ongoing investigation. The court noted, "The interests of both sides must be protected, ensuring that the petitioner can commence his MBA course without compromising the respondents' interests in pursuing the disciplinary actions."

Property Documentation: Singh must deposit the original property documents with the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai, by June 15, 2024. Pending this, he must execute an undertaking not to alienate, transfer, or create third-party rights over his share of the property.

Communication Commitments: Singh is required to provide a dedicated email for all official communication and respond promptly to any inquiries from the Income Tax Department or other enforcement agencies.

Availability for Inquiry: Singh must be available for electronic interactions with the authorities and, if necessary, return to India within three working days upon receiving a summons, with exceptions during his examination periods at MIT.

The court's decision reflects a pragmatic approach to ensure compliance with legal processes while accommodating the petitioner's educational pursuits. The judgment highlighted the necessity of maintaining effective communication and cooperation with the investigating authorities. "The framework set out ensures that the petitioner can fulfill his academic obligations while remaining accessible to the respondents," the bench remarked.

Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan emphasized, "The petitioner's commitment to not create third-party interests in the property and his prompt cooperation with the authorities are crucial for this arrangement to work."

The Bombay High Court's ruling enables Rajdeep Singh to pursue his MBA at MIT, subject to stringent conditions ensuring his participation in the ongoing income tax inquiry. This judgment exemplifies the court's effort to balance individual aspirations with legal obligations, setting a precedent for similar cases in the future.

Date of Decision: May 30, 2024

Latest Legal News