Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Education a Pathway to Reformation - Kerala High Court Upholds Convict's Right to Education

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the importance of education in the reformation of convicts, the Kerala High Court, presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, has delivered a landmark judgment, affirming the rights of a life convict to pursue higher education. The judgment, dated 18th January 2024, in the case of W.P.(Crl.) No. 1037 of 2023, revolves around petitioner Karuvangadan Mukthar @ Muthu, who sought permission to join a three-year LLB course at KMCT Law College.

Justice Thomas, in his observation, emphasized that “the criminal jurisprudence in our country is based on the principles not only of deterrence or retribution but also of reformation.” This statement formed the crux of the judgment, which effectively balanced the convict's right to education against the societal interests and the administrative concerns of the educational institution.

The petitioner, currently a convict undergoing life imprisonment for offenses including section 302 of the IPC, had cleared the entrance examination for the law course but was hindered by his incarceration from joining the college. The college authorities raised objections, citing potential disciplinary issues and referencing the UGC regulations which prohibit imparting law courses online. However, the court referred to the precedent set in Pattakka Suresh Babu v. State of Kerala, where convicts were permitted to attend classes online, and noted the discriminatory stance of the college as it had previously admitted another convict under similar circumstances.

Justice Thomas further noted, “When the prisoner expresses his willingness to undergo a course of study and has even gained admission after a competitive examination, the objection raised by the college cannot be countenanced and, on the other hand, is to be deprecated.” This powerful statement highlights the court's commitment to the reformation and rehabilitation of convicts through education.

In its ruling, the High Court directed KMCT Law College to admit the petitioner for the LLB course and make necessary arrangements for his online education. Additionally, the court ordered that if the petitioner's physical presence is required for admission, he should be granted escort leave.

Date of Decision: 18 January 2024

KARUVANGADAN MUKTHAR @ MUTHU  VS SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL

 

Latest Legal News