Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

Education a Pathway to Reformation - Kerala High Court Upholds Convict's Right to Education

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the importance of education in the reformation of convicts, the Kerala High Court, presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, has delivered a landmark judgment, affirming the rights of a life convict to pursue higher education. The judgment, dated 18th January 2024, in the case of W.P.(Crl.) No. 1037 of 2023, revolves around petitioner Karuvangadan Mukthar @ Muthu, who sought permission to join a three-year LLB course at KMCT Law College.

Justice Thomas, in his observation, emphasized that “the criminal jurisprudence in our country is based on the principles not only of deterrence or retribution but also of reformation.” This statement formed the crux of the judgment, which effectively balanced the convict's right to education against the societal interests and the administrative concerns of the educational institution.

The petitioner, currently a convict undergoing life imprisonment for offenses including section 302 of the IPC, had cleared the entrance examination for the law course but was hindered by his incarceration from joining the college. The college authorities raised objections, citing potential disciplinary issues and referencing the UGC regulations which prohibit imparting law courses online. However, the court referred to the precedent set in Pattakka Suresh Babu v. State of Kerala, where convicts were permitted to attend classes online, and noted the discriminatory stance of the college as it had previously admitted another convict under similar circumstances.

Justice Thomas further noted, “When the prisoner expresses his willingness to undergo a course of study and has even gained admission after a competitive examination, the objection raised by the college cannot be countenanced and, on the other hand, is to be deprecated.” This powerful statement highlights the court's commitment to the reformation and rehabilitation of convicts through education.

In its ruling, the High Court directed KMCT Law College to admit the petitioner for the LLB course and make necessary arrangements for his online education. Additionally, the court ordered that if the petitioner's physical presence is required for admission, he should be granted escort leave.

Date of Decision: 18 January 2024

KARUVANGADAN MUKTHAR @ MUTHU  VS SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL

 

Latest Legal News