Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Education a Pathway to Reformation - Kerala High Court Upholds Convict's Right to Education

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the importance of education in the reformation of convicts, the Kerala High Court, presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, has delivered a landmark judgment, affirming the rights of a life convict to pursue higher education. The judgment, dated 18th January 2024, in the case of W.P.(Crl.) No. 1037 of 2023, revolves around petitioner Karuvangadan Mukthar @ Muthu, who sought permission to join a three-year LLB course at KMCT Law College.

Justice Thomas, in his observation, emphasized that “the criminal jurisprudence in our country is based on the principles not only of deterrence or retribution but also of reformation.” This statement formed the crux of the judgment, which effectively balanced the convict's right to education against the societal interests and the administrative concerns of the educational institution.

The petitioner, currently a convict undergoing life imprisonment for offenses including section 302 of the IPC, had cleared the entrance examination for the law course but was hindered by his incarceration from joining the college. The college authorities raised objections, citing potential disciplinary issues and referencing the UGC regulations which prohibit imparting law courses online. However, the court referred to the precedent set in Pattakka Suresh Babu v. State of Kerala, where convicts were permitted to attend classes online, and noted the discriminatory stance of the college as it had previously admitted another convict under similar circumstances.

Justice Thomas further noted, “When the prisoner expresses his willingness to undergo a course of study and has even gained admission after a competitive examination, the objection raised by the college cannot be countenanced and, on the other hand, is to be deprecated.” This powerful statement highlights the court's commitment to the reformation and rehabilitation of convicts through education.

In its ruling, the High Court directed KMCT Law College to admit the petitioner for the LLB course and make necessary arrangements for his online education. Additionally, the court ordered that if the petitioner's physical presence is required for admission, he should be granted escort leave.

Date of Decision: 18 January 2024

KARUVANGADAN MUKTHAR @ MUTHU  VS SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL

 

Latest Legal News