Statutory Interest Under Land Acquisition Act Cannot Be Denied For Delay In Seeking Amendment To Claim: Delhi High Court Natural Mother Has Preferential Right To Custody Of Minor Child Over Grandmother Under Guardians and Wards Act: Allahabad High Court Pendency Of Vigilance Inquiry Is Not A Ground To Withhold Payment For Admittedly Executed Contract Works: Andhra Pradesh High Court Maharashtra Stamp Act | Conveyance Executed To Perfect Title Pursuant To Earlier Agreement Must Be Treated As Part Of Single Transaction: Bombay High Court Commercial Petrol Pump With Pucca Structure Not 'Thika Tenancy', Civil Court Has Eviction Jurisdiction: Calcutta High Court Evidence Of Intent To Cause Deaths Distinguishes Accused From Others: Delhi High Court Denies Bail To Athar Khan In 2020 Riots Case Unexplained Delay In FIR And Absence Of Medical Evidence Entitles Accused To Benefit Of Doubt Under Section 302 IPC: Gauhati High Court Custodial Death | Registration Of FIR Mandatory Upon Disclosure Of Cognizable Offence, Independent Investigation Required: Gujarat High Court Testimony Of Prosecutrix Is Not A 'Gospel Truth' And Must Be Evaluated On The Touchstone Of Credibility And Consistency: Allahabad High Court Motor Accident Claims | Appellate Court Has A Legal Duty To Award 'Just And Fair' Compensation Even In Absence Of Cross-Objections: Andhra Pradesh High Court Magistrate Cannot Summon Additional Accused Under Sec 204 CrPC Without Passing A Speaking Order: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | 'Representation' Under Foreigners Tribunal Order Is Equivalent To 'Written Statement', Requires Full Disclosure Of Foundational Facts: Gauhati High Court Order 21 Rule 32 CPC | Expert Evidence Regarding Age Of Construction Is Mandatory To Prove Violation: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Commissioner Must Form Opinion On ‘Justification For Delay’ Before Imposing Penalty Under Section 4A(3)(b): High Court Contempt Of Courts Act | Issuing Cheque To Induce Withdrawal Of Pending Litigation Amounts To Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Successful Recovery Of Weapon And Progress In Investigation Justify Grant Of Bail Even In Serious Offences: Kerala High Court Section 64 CPC | Private Alienation Of Attached Property Is Void: Madras High Court Slaps Contempt Fine On Judgment Debtors, Holds Mortgages Null & Void Limitation For Land Acquisition Reference Must Be Calculated From Date Of Knowledge If Statutory Notice Is Not Served: Madhya Pradesh High Court State Can Create In-Service Quota In PG Medical Courses Without Mandating Prior Rural Service As Condition Precedent: Punjab & Haryana High Court 69 BNS  | Mere Failure To Marry Does Not Establish False Promise From Inception: Telangana High Court

Education a Pathway to Reformation - Kerala High Court Upholds Convict's Right to Education

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the importance of education in the reformation of convicts, the Kerala High Court, presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, has delivered a landmark judgment, affirming the rights of a life convict to pursue higher education. The judgment, dated 18th January 2024, in the case of W.P.(Crl.) No. 1037 of 2023, revolves around petitioner Karuvangadan Mukthar @ Muthu, who sought permission to join a three-year LLB course at KMCT Law College.

Justice Thomas, in his observation, emphasized that “the criminal jurisprudence in our country is based on the principles not only of deterrence or retribution but also of reformation.” This statement formed the crux of the judgment, which effectively balanced the convict's right to education against the societal interests and the administrative concerns of the educational institution.

The petitioner, currently a convict undergoing life imprisonment for offenses including section 302 of the IPC, had cleared the entrance examination for the law course but was hindered by his incarceration from joining the college. The college authorities raised objections, citing potential disciplinary issues and referencing the UGC regulations which prohibit imparting law courses online. However, the court referred to the precedent set in Pattakka Suresh Babu v. State of Kerala, where convicts were permitted to attend classes online, and noted the discriminatory stance of the college as it had previously admitted another convict under similar circumstances.

Justice Thomas further noted, “When the prisoner expresses his willingness to undergo a course of study and has even gained admission after a competitive examination, the objection raised by the college cannot be countenanced and, on the other hand, is to be deprecated.” This powerful statement highlights the court's commitment to the reformation and rehabilitation of convicts through education.

In its ruling, the High Court directed KMCT Law College to admit the petitioner for the LLB course and make necessary arrangements for his online education. Additionally, the court ordered that if the petitioner's physical presence is required for admission, he should be granted escort leave.

Date of Decision: 18 January 2024

KARUVANGADAN MUKTHAR @ MUTHU  VS SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL

 

Latest Legal News