Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court

Dying Declaration Alone Can Uphold Conviction If Found Credible and Consistent: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India upheld the conviction of Rajendra Kolhe under Section 302 IPC, affirming that a credible and consistent dying declaration can form the sole basis for conviction. The Court reiterated that minor inconsistencies in witness testimonies do not undermine the core evidence provided by a dying declaration.

Rajendra Kolhe was convicted for the murder of his wife, Rekha, who sustained fatal burn injuries. The prosecution's case relied heavily on Rekha's dying declarations (Ex. 59) and witness testimonies. While the trial court convicted Kolhe and acquitted other accused family members, the High Court upheld this conviction. Kolhe challenged the conviction, citing inconsistencies in testimonies and questioning the validity of the second dying declaration (Ex. 65).

The Supreme Court found the dying declaration (Ex. 59) credible, voluntary, and consistent with medical evidence.

"The dying declaration recorded shortly after the incident was deemed reliable. The presence and endorsement of medical officers ensured its credibility."

The Court acknowledged minor inconsistencies in witness testimonies but deemed them non-material. "Such inconsistencies are natural and do not affect the sub-stratum of the core evidence."

Legal Principles on Dying Declarations: The Court reaffirmed principles from Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay, emphasizing that a reliable and voluntary dying declaration can be the sole basis for conviction.

"Dying declarations hold significant weight as they are made in extremis and generally free from motives to fabricate."

Assessment of Multiple Dying Declarations: The Court emphasized the importance of independently assessing multiple dying declarations for consistency and reliability.

"It is the reliability of the dying declaration that matters, not the plurality. Each declaration must be evaluated on its own merit."

Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the conviction based on the overwhelming evidence against the appellant. Rajendra Kolhe is directed to surrender within two weeks to serve his sentence.

Date of Decision: 15th May 2024

Rajendra  vs. State of Maharashtra

Similar News