Non-Disclosure Of Medical Deformity While Seeking Re-Appointment Amounts To Deliberate Suppression, Termination Restored: Supreme Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Suit Based On Unregistered Gift Deed Not Maintainable; Plaint Liable For Rejection: Andhra Pradesh High Court Accused Has No Blanket Immunity From Re-Arrest If Initial Arrest Was Declared Illegal Only On Technical Grounds: Punjab & Haryana High Court Father’s Obligation To Maintain Minor Child Under Section 125 CrPC Is Absolute Even If Mother Is Also Earning: Uttarakhand High Court Variation In Physical Signature No Ground To Reject Bid If Submitted Via Secure Digital Signature Certificate: Orissa High Court Management Cannot Re-Examine Selection After Candidate Alters Position By Leaving Previous Job: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Production Of E-Way Bills Not Proof Of Physical Movement Of Goods; GST Registration Can Be Cancelled For Fake ITC Claims: Madras High Court Employer Cannot Abuse Unequal Bargaining Power To Deny Back Wages For Period Of Eligibility: Supreme Court Restores Dues Of MSRTC Employee Entire Bank Account Of Educational Institution Cannot Be Frozen Merely Because It Received Fees From Accused Parent: Karnataka High Court CARA Must Facilitate Relocation Of Children Adopted Under HAMA; Cannot Abdicate Responsibility By Issuing Mere 'Support Letters': Delhi High Court Valid Caste Certificate Issued By Competent Authority Is Sine Qua Non To Establish Offence Under SC/ST Act: Chhattisgarh High Court Shifting Defense From 'No Transaction' To 'Transaction Not Proved' Prima Facie Shows Dishonest Intent Since Inception: Calcutta High Court Sugar Exports Under Specific Permission Cannot Be Treated As 'Restricted' To Deny RoDTEP Benefits: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Rejects Bail Of Man Who Killed Bystander While Aiming At Another; Invokes 'Doctrine Of Transfer Of Malice' SDO Cannot Reclassify Public Utility Land To Grant Private Leases; Such Pattas Are Void Ab Initio: Supreme Court DNA Test Report Prevails Over Presumption Of Legitimacy Under Section 112 Evidence Act If Report Is Undisputed: Supreme Court Foreign Summary Judgment Passed After Refusing Leave To Defend Is Not 'On Merits' Under Section 13 CPC: Supreme Court Constitutional Safeguards Don’t End At Prison Gates: Supreme Court Extends Mandatory Disability Rights Directions To All States & UTs Courts Not Bound By Low Govt Rates For Prosthetic Limbs; Claimants Entitled To Choose Private Centres For 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Reject Plaint Over Insufficient Court Fee Without Giving Mandatory Opportunity To Correct Valuation: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders Immediate Removal Of Illegal Encroachments On National Highways; Bans New Dhabas Within Right Of Way

Domain Name Registration Services Not Royalty: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of GoDaddy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal decision, the Delhi High Court has ruled in favor of GoDaddy, a leading US-based company, stating that income received for providing domain name registration services cannot be categorized as 'royalty' under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The judgment, delivered by Hon'ble Justices Rajiv Shakdher and Girish Kathpalia, has far-reaching implications for the taxation of domain name registration services in India. The court's decision hinged on the fundamental distinction between the domain registrar and the domain name owner, highlighting that GoDaddy, in its role as a Registrar, does not have ownership rights over the registered domain names.

The court observed, "Mere registration of a domain name does not create any proprietary right for the Registrar or any other person in the name used as a domain name or the domain name registration." This crucial point emphasized that GoDaddy acts as an intermediary, facilitating domain name registrations for its customers.

Furthermore, the court rejected the comparison between domain names and trademarks, noting that domain names are created through a registration process and serve a different purpose. The judgment clarified that the fee received by GoDaddy for domain registration services does not involve the transfer of rights to use the domain names.

The court also referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Satyam Infoway, which highlighted that domain name registrants, not Registrars like GoDaddy, own the domain names and can protect their rights through legal actions.

Delhi High Court's ruling establishes a clear distinction between domain name registration services and royalty, offering relief to GoDaddy and potentially setting a precedent for similar cases in the future.

Date of Decision: December 11, 2023

GODADDY.COM LLC VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.

 

Latest Legal News