Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Doctrine of Lis Pendens Cannot Be an Engine of Fraud: High Court Sets Aside Trial Court’s Order in Land Sale Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Chhattisgarh has overturned a decision of the Second Additional District Judge, Durg, in the much-discussed land sale case (FA No. 16 of 2023). The case, which has garnered attention due to its complex legal implications involving property laws and principles of civil procedure, reached a pivotal moment on November 10, 2023, with the High Court’s pronouncement.

The Bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Goutam Bhaduri and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari challenged the trial court’s earlier order, which dismissed a suit filed for declaration & injunction by the appellants/plaintiffs. The suit’s dismissal was initially based on the application of Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

In a statement that underscores the crux of their decision, the Bench observed, “The principle of ‘finality of litigation’ cannot be pressed to the extent of such an absurdity that it becomes an engine of fraud in the hands of dishonest litigants.” This observation highlights the court’s stance on the misuse of legal doctrines to perpetrate fraud.

The case revolved around the sale of property during the pendency of an earlier suit and raised critical questions about the application of the doctrine of lis pendens – a principle that prohibits the transfer of a property under dispute during litigation. The High Court, in its judgment, emphasized the need for a meticulous examination of facts and legal principles, especially when allegations of fraud are involved in obtaining a compromise decree.

Advocates representing both sides presented their arguments, with Mr. B.P. Sharma leading the counsel for the appellants. The High Court’s decision to set aside the trial court’s order and direct further proceedings indicates a significant shift in the case’s trajectory, potentially impacting the doctrine’s application in future property disputes

Date of Decision: 10-11-2023

Mehul Kumar Patel  VS Rishikesh Gupta

Latest Legal News