Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Doctrine of Lis Pendens Cannot Be an Engine of Fraud: High Court Sets Aside Trial Court’s Order in Land Sale Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Chhattisgarh has overturned a decision of the Second Additional District Judge, Durg, in the much-discussed land sale case (FA No. 16 of 2023). The case, which has garnered attention due to its complex legal implications involving property laws and principles of civil procedure, reached a pivotal moment on November 10, 2023, with the High Court’s pronouncement.

The Bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Goutam Bhaduri and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari challenged the trial court’s earlier order, which dismissed a suit filed for declaration & injunction by the appellants/plaintiffs. The suit’s dismissal was initially based on the application of Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

In a statement that underscores the crux of their decision, the Bench observed, “The principle of ‘finality of litigation’ cannot be pressed to the extent of such an absurdity that it becomes an engine of fraud in the hands of dishonest litigants.” This observation highlights the court’s stance on the misuse of legal doctrines to perpetrate fraud.

The case revolved around the sale of property during the pendency of an earlier suit and raised critical questions about the application of the doctrine of lis pendens – a principle that prohibits the transfer of a property under dispute during litigation. The High Court, in its judgment, emphasized the need for a meticulous examination of facts and legal principles, especially when allegations of fraud are involved in obtaining a compromise decree.

Advocates representing both sides presented their arguments, with Mr. B.P. Sharma leading the counsel for the appellants. The High Court’s decision to set aside the trial court’s order and direct further proceedings indicates a significant shift in the case’s trajectory, potentially impacting the doctrine’s application in future property disputes

Date of Decision: 10-11-2023

Mehul Kumar Patel  VS Rishikesh Gupta

Latest Legal News