UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court

Discipline Paramount in Armed Forces: Delhi High Court Upholds BSF Constable’s Dismissal for Serious Misconduct

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court yesterday upheld the dismissal of a Border Security Force (BSF) constable, Brijesh Kumar Singh, affirming the paramount importance of discipline in the armed forces. The bench, comprising Justices V. Kameswar Rao and Saurabh Banerjee, dismissed Singh’s petition challenging the orders of the Summary Security Force Court (SSFC) and the Directorate General of BSF.

The High Court's decision resonated with the observation that maintaining discipline in armed forces is of utmost importance. “The charges which have been proved against the petitioner are very serious,” stated Justice V. Kameswar Rao in the judgment. Singh faced severe allegations of using threatening language towards his superior officer and a fellow constable, along with actions detrimental to the discipline of the force.

The court noted, “Given the charges, and also, when the petitioner was employed in a disciplined force, this Court is of the view that the penalty of dismissal from service, should not be interfered with.” This remark highlights the judiciary’s stance on the strict adherence to disciplinary conduct within the armed forces.

Singh’s dismissal followed his conviction by the SSFC on charges under the BSF Act, including threatening and insubordinate language and acts prejudicial to the good order and discipline of the force. The Directorate General of BSF had mitigated his sentence of imprisonment but upheld his dismissal from service, a decision that the High Court has now confirmed.

Date of Decision: 16 January 2024

BRIJESH KUMAR SINGH VS  UOI & ORS.           

 

Latest Legal News