Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Delhi High Court Upholds Its Jurisdiction in Foreign Arbitral Award Enforcement, Citing “Existence of Debtor’s Asset” as Key

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment that clarifies the jurisdictional aspects of enforcing foreign arbitral awards, the Delhi High Court, led by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan, has set a precedent by affirming its authority to entertain enforcement proceedings when the award debtor possesses assets within its domain. The case, TAQA India Power Ventures Private Limited & Anr. Vs. NCC Infrastructure Holdings Limited, revolved around the enforcement of a foreign award dated January 24, 2018, arbitrated under the Singapore International Arbitration Centre.

Justice Prateek Jalan, in his meticulous analysis, stated, “The question of jurisdiction...turns upon a determination as to whether the award debtor possesses any assets within the jurisdiction of the Court.” This observation came amidst deliberations on whether the debt owed by Himalayan Green Energy Private Limited (HGEPL) to the award debtor could be considered an asset, despite being classified as “doubtful” or “written off.”

The court dismissed the award debtor’s preliminary objection regarding the lack of jurisdiction due to non-residency and absence of assets in Delhi. The counter-argument highlighted the existence of assets owed to the award debtor by HGEPL, a company based in Delhi. The court’s judgment emphasized, “An award holder is entitled to elect any Court within which assets of the award debtor are available, howsoever diminished their value may be.”

This ruling is pivotal in the landscape of arbitration law, particularly in the context of international commercial disputes. The court effectively rejected concerns about potential “forum shopping” in enforcement proceedings, aligning with the Supreme Court’s directives that the location of the award debtor’s assets is central to determining jurisdiction.

Represented by a team of eminent lawyers, including Mr. Rajiv Nayar and Mr. Ashish Dholakia for the decree holders and Dr. Amit George for the judgment debtor, the case has set a crucial precedent. The court’s decision to uphold its jurisdiction and dismiss the applications challenging it marks a significant stride in streamlining the enforcement process of foreign arbitral awards in India.

The court has scheduled the enforcement proceedings, along with pending applications, for further proceedings on December 4, 2023. This judgment is seen as a reinforcement of the Delhi High Court’s commitment to upholding the rule of law in complex international arbitration matters.

Date of Decision: 09.11.2023

TAQA INDIA POWER VENTURES   PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. VS NCC INFRASTRUCTURE   HOLDINGS LIMITED,

Latest Legal News