Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Entertainment Contract Dispute of Sapna Chaudhary

The Delhi High Court, in a significant ruling, upheld an arbitral award involving a prominent artist and a media company, underscoring the sanctity of contractual agreements and arbitration clauses. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri, in his judgment, emphasized, “All other terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and continue to be in force except to the extent modified hereunder.”

The dispute centered around a Services and Alliance Agreement and its subsequent amendments between the artist, Sapna Chaudhary, and MX Media and Entertainment Pte Ltd. The Arbitral Tribunal had earlier awarded Rs. 2 crore with interest to the media company, a decision contested by Chaudhary under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Chaudhary’s legal team argued that the agreement was void ab initio and claimed the arbitral proceedings were invalid due to a supposed novation of the original agreement. However, the High Court found that the subsequent amendments did not novate but only modified certain clauses of the original agreement. Justice Ohri noted, “The subsequent agreement only amended and did not novate the earlier Agreement.”

Further, the court dismissed the argument that the issuance of a post-dated cheque by Chaudhary had resolved all disputes, stating that no conclusive settlement was reached. The court also rejected the contention that the award was against the Public Policy of India, terming the claim as baseless.

This judgment reinforces the principle that contractual terms and arbitration clauses must be upheld, and parties are bound by the terms of their agreement unless legally novated. The decision is a reminder of the judiciary’s role in upholding contractual obligations and the finality of arbitral awards, setting a precedent in contract and arbitration law.

Date of Decision: 09 November 2023

SAPNA @ SAPNA CHAUDHARY VS MX MEDIA AND ENTERTAINMENT PTE LTD