Writ Jurisdiction Not Appropriate For Adjudicating Complex Title Disputes; Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Madhya Pradesh High Court Joint Account Holder Not Liable Under Section 138 NI Act If Not A Signatory To Dishonoured Cheque: Allahabad High Court Private Individuals Accepting Money Can Be Prosecuted Under MPID Act; Nomenclature As 'Loan' Irrelevant: Supreme Court Nomenclature Of Transaction As 'Loan' Irrelevant; If Ingredients Met, It Is A 'Deposit' Under MPID Act: Supreme Court Pleadings Must State Material Facts, Not Evidence; Deficiency In Pleading Cannot Be Raised For First Time In Appeal: Supreme Court Denial Of Remission Cannot Rest Solely On Heinousness Of Crime; Justice Doesn't Permit Permanent Incarceration In Shadow Of Worst Act: Supreme Court Second Application For Rejection Of Plaint Barred By Res Judicata If Earlier Order Attained Finality: Supreme Court Section 6(5) Hindu Succession Act Is A Saving Clause, Not A Jurisdictional Bar To Partition Suits: Supreme Court Sale Of Natural Gas Via Common Carrier Pipelines Is An Inter-State Sale; UP Has No Jurisdiction To Levy VAT: Supreme Court Mediclaim Reimbursement Not Deductible From Motor Accident Compensation; Tortfeasor Can’t Benefit From Claimant’s Prudence: Supreme Court Rules Of Procedure Are Handmaid Of Justice, Not Mistress; Striking Off Defence Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Not Mechanical: Supreme Court Power To Strike Off Tenant's Defense Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Discretionary, Not To Be Exercised Mechanically: Supreme Court Areas Urbanised Before 1959 Don't Require Separate Notification To Fall Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Delhi High Court Police Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts To Perform Compensatory Justice; Direct Nexus With Offence Essential: Bombay High Court FSL Probe Before Electronic Evidence Meets Section 65B Admissibility Standards: Gujarat High Court Court Shouldn't Adjudicate Rights At Stage Of Granting Leave Under Section 92 CPC, Only Prima Facie Case Required: Allahabad High Court Right To Seek Bail Based On Non-Furnishing Of 'Grounds Of Arrest' Applies Only Prospectively From November 6, 2025: Madras High Court Prior Exposure To Accused Before TIP Renders Identification Meaningless: Delhi High Court Acquits Four In Uphaar Cinema Murder Case No Particular Format Prescribed For 'Proposed Resolution' In No-Confidence Motion; Intention Of Members To Be Gathered From Document As A Whole: Orissa High Court Trial Court Cannot Grant Temporary Injunction Without Adverting To Allegations Of Fraud And Collusion: Calcutta High Court "Ganja" Definition Under NDPS Act Excludes Roots & Stems: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail As Seized Weight Included Whole Plants Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Doesn't Displace Section 37 NDPS Mandate In Commercial Quantity Cases: Orissa High Court

Delhi High Court Slams UCO Bank for Contempt of Court: Orders Immediate Action on Release of Funds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a scathing verdict, the Delhi High Court has reprimanded UCO Bank for its deliberate violation and non-compliance of a court order, directing the immediate release of funds from the bank accounts of the deceased as per his will. The judgment, delivered by HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA on December 7, 2023, underscores the importance of upholding court directives.

The court's observations on this matter were crystal clear, with Justice Sharma stating, “The concerned official of the Bank is guilty of committing civil contempt of the directions of this Court dated 01.11.2019.”

The case revolved around a contempt petition filed by the ex-daughter-in-law of the deceased testator, who sought the release of funds as per the deceased’s will. The court had previously issued directions on November 1, 2019, for the release of funds, but UCO Bank had subsequently imposed a lien on the released funds.

The petitioner alleged wilful disobedience of the court's directions by bank officials, causing significant hindrance in executing the deceased’s will. The court took a stern stance, issuing a show cause notice to the concerned Chief Manager of UCO Bank, directing them to appear in person and justify their non-compliance.

Furthermore, Justice Sharma emphasized, “The act committed by the concerned official of the Bank amounts to manifestly impeding the course of administration of justice and thereby attempting to wriggle out of the directions passed by this Court.”

In a significant move, the court ordered UCO Bank to release or vacate the lien on the funds and allow the executor, the petitioner, to operate the bank account according to the wishes of the deceased testator. The bank was given a deadline to comply with this directive.

Date of Decision: December 07, 2023

MAHALAKSHMI VS PAVANI UCO BANK  & ANR

Latest Legal News