Second 482 Petition Maintainable On Changed Circumstances: Allahabad HC Quashes Proceedings Against Aptech VP In Jal Nigam Recruitment Case Police Have No Jurisdiction To Adjudicate Civil Disputes Between Parties, Must Adhere To Statutory Limits: Andhra Pradesh High Court Consent Decree Based On Compromise Signed By Constituted Attorney And Counsel Is Binding Even After 30 Years: Bombay High Court Changing Service Conditions Mid-Bond For Senior Residents Doctors Is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Quashes Retroactive Application Of New SOP Succession Certificate Under Indian Succession Act Cannot Determine Entitlement To Family Pension And Retiral Benefits: Allahabad High Court Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected For Failure To Value Reliefs Separately And Pay Ad-Valorem Court Fees: Delhi High Court NDPS Act | Non-Compliance With Mandatory Provisions Of Sections 42, 50 And 57 Vitiates Search And Seizure, Warrants Acquittal: Gujarat High Court FIR Cannot Be Quashed Merely On Complainant’s Consent; Court Must Independently Scrutinize If Ingredients Of Offence Are Made Out: Calcutta High Court Section 25 Hindu Marriage Act | Permanent Alimony Must Be Based On Husband’s Financial Capacity And Wife’s Reasonable Comfort: Jharkhand High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Direct Registration Of FIR Or Constitute SIT When Statutory Remedies Under CrPC Are Available: Delhi High Court Child Cannot Be Used As A Pawn To Prove Adultery Between Parents: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Plea To Examine Minor As Witness Section 156(3) CrPC | Magistrate Cannot Give Criminal Colour To Administrative Disputes By Directing FIR Registration Without Compliance With Priyanka Srivastava: High Court Contempt Of Court Act | Burden To Prove 'Willful Disobedience' Lies Upon Complainant; Merely Alleging Non-Compliance Is Insufficient: Karnataka High Court Family Court Cannot Dismiss Matrimonial Petition Merely For Lack Of 'Elaborate' Evidence In Ex-Parte Proceedings: Kerala High Court Election Petition Under Section 100 RP Act Must Be Supported By Mandatory Affidavit In Form 94A For Corrupt Practice Allegations: Madras High Court Water Act | Supreme Court Directive Overrides Previous Quashing Orders; Magistrate Can Proceed Against Municipal Officials For Unchecked Sewage Discharge: Karnataka High Court A&C Act | Arbitrator’s Decision On Jurisdiction Treated As A Preliminary Issue Amounts To An 'Interim Award' Amenable To Challenge Under Section 34: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 138 NI Act | No Requirement To Hear Accused At Pre-Cognizance Stage Under Section 223 BNSS: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 94 BNSS | Financial Institutions Entitled To Retain Custody Of Pledged Gold Provided Undertaking Is Filed Before Trial Court: Telangana High Court Family Courts Act | Section 14 Overrides Section 92 Indian Evidence Act To Admit Oral Evidence For Proving Real Source Of Funds: Kerala High Court

Delhi High Court Slams UCO Bank for Contempt of Court: Orders Immediate Action on Release of Funds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a scathing verdict, the Delhi High Court has reprimanded UCO Bank for its deliberate violation and non-compliance of a court order, directing the immediate release of funds from the bank accounts of the deceased as per his will. The judgment, delivered by HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA on December 7, 2023, underscores the importance of upholding court directives.

The court's observations on this matter were crystal clear, with Justice Sharma stating, “The concerned official of the Bank is guilty of committing civil contempt of the directions of this Court dated 01.11.2019.”

The case revolved around a contempt petition filed by the ex-daughter-in-law of the deceased testator, who sought the release of funds as per the deceased’s will. The court had previously issued directions on November 1, 2019, for the release of funds, but UCO Bank had subsequently imposed a lien on the released funds.

The petitioner alleged wilful disobedience of the court's directions by bank officials, causing significant hindrance in executing the deceased’s will. The court took a stern stance, issuing a show cause notice to the concerned Chief Manager of UCO Bank, directing them to appear in person and justify their non-compliance.

Furthermore, Justice Sharma emphasized, “The act committed by the concerned official of the Bank amounts to manifestly impeding the course of administration of justice and thereby attempting to wriggle out of the directions passed by this Court.”

In a significant move, the court ordered UCO Bank to release or vacate the lien on the funds and allow the executor, the petitioner, to operate the bank account according to the wishes of the deceased testator. The bank was given a deadline to comply with this directive.

Date of Decision: December 07, 2023

MAHALAKSHMI VS PAVANI UCO BANK  & ANR

Latest Legal News