"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

Delhi High Court Slams Police for  Throwing to Winds Constitutional Rights - Orders Compensation for Illegal Detention

05 September 2024 5:31 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, 5th October 2023: The Delhi High Court Yesterday delivered a scathing judgment against police authorities for illegal arrest and detention of Pankaj Kumar Sharma, a resident of Delhi. The court stated that the police authorities “acted in a high-handed manner” and criticized them for “throwing to winds the constitutional and fundamental rights of a citizen.”

In the case Pankaj Kumar Sharma vs. Govt of NCT of Delhi & ORS, Mr. Sharma sought compensation for being illegally arrested and detained at Police Station Badarpur on September 2, 2022, without any formal arrest, FIR, or DD entry. The judgment came as a stern reminder to police authorities to adhere to due procedure and constitutional safeguards.

Justice Subramonium Prasad observed, “This Court is deeply troubled by the fact that the Petitioner was not even arrested. He was simply picked up from the spot, brought to the Police Station, and placed inside the lock-up for no rhyme or reason.”

The judgment also cited guidelines set by the Apex Court in the case of D K Basu vs. State of West Bengal, emphasizing the necessity of following proper procedure during arrests. It added that the authorities’ actions were “appalling” and that a punishment of censure alone was “not sufficient in the facts and circumstances of this case.”

The Court ordered compensation for Mr. Sharma, Invoking its public law jurisdiction and citing previous precedents where the violation of Article 21, guaranteeing life and personal liberty, had resulted in similar outcomes.

Legal experts believe that today’s ruling could serve as a significant deterrent against police misconduct and set a precedent for similar cases involving illegal detention and arrest.

Date of Decision: 05 OCTOBER, 2023

PANKAJ KUMAR SHARMA vs  GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. 

Similar News