Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court

Delhi High Court Slams Police for  Throwing to Winds Constitutional Rights - Orders Compensation for Illegal Detention

05 September 2024 5:31 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, 5th October 2023: The Delhi High Court Yesterday delivered a scathing judgment against police authorities for illegal arrest and detention of Pankaj Kumar Sharma, a resident of Delhi. The court stated that the police authorities “acted in a high-handed manner” and criticized them for “throwing to winds the constitutional and fundamental rights of a citizen.”

In the case Pankaj Kumar Sharma vs. Govt of NCT of Delhi & ORS, Mr. Sharma sought compensation for being illegally arrested and detained at Police Station Badarpur on September 2, 2022, without any formal arrest, FIR, or DD entry. The judgment came as a stern reminder to police authorities to adhere to due procedure and constitutional safeguards.

Justice Subramonium Prasad observed, “This Court is deeply troubled by the fact that the Petitioner was not even arrested. He was simply picked up from the spot, brought to the Police Station, and placed inside the lock-up for no rhyme or reason.”

The judgment also cited guidelines set by the Apex Court in the case of D K Basu vs. State of West Bengal, emphasizing the necessity of following proper procedure during arrests. It added that the authorities’ actions were “appalling” and that a punishment of censure alone was “not sufficient in the facts and circumstances of this case.”

The Court ordered compensation for Mr. Sharma, Invoking its public law jurisdiction and citing previous precedents where the violation of Article 21, guaranteeing life and personal liberty, had resulted in similar outcomes.

Legal experts believe that today’s ruling could serve as a significant deterrent against police misconduct and set a precedent for similar cases involving illegal detention and arrest.

Date of Decision: 05 OCTOBER, 2023

PANKAJ KUMAR SHARMA vs  GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. 

Latest Legal News