MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Delhi High Court Slams Police for  Throwing to Winds Constitutional Rights - Orders Compensation for Illegal Detention

05 September 2024 5:31 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, 5th October 2023: The Delhi High Court Yesterday delivered a scathing judgment against police authorities for illegal arrest and detention of Pankaj Kumar Sharma, a resident of Delhi. The court stated that the police authorities “acted in a high-handed manner” and criticized them for “throwing to winds the constitutional and fundamental rights of a citizen.”

In the case Pankaj Kumar Sharma vs. Govt of NCT of Delhi & ORS, Mr. Sharma sought compensation for being illegally arrested and detained at Police Station Badarpur on September 2, 2022, without any formal arrest, FIR, or DD entry. The judgment came as a stern reminder to police authorities to adhere to due procedure and constitutional safeguards.

Justice Subramonium Prasad observed, “This Court is deeply troubled by the fact that the Petitioner was not even arrested. He was simply picked up from the spot, brought to the Police Station, and placed inside the lock-up for no rhyme or reason.”

The judgment also cited guidelines set by the Apex Court in the case of D K Basu vs. State of West Bengal, emphasizing the necessity of following proper procedure during arrests. It added that the authorities’ actions were “appalling” and that a punishment of censure alone was “not sufficient in the facts and circumstances of this case.”

The Court ordered compensation for Mr. Sharma, Invoking its public law jurisdiction and citing previous precedents where the violation of Article 21, guaranteeing life and personal liberty, had resulted in similar outcomes.

Legal experts believe that today’s ruling could serve as a significant deterrent against police misconduct and set a precedent for similar cases involving illegal detention and arrest.

Date of Decision: 05 OCTOBER, 2023

PANKAJ KUMAR SHARMA vs  GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. 

Latest Legal News